MedInfo 2010

Hi Roger, On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:19:53 +0100 Roger Erens wrote: > > In this connectathon, I assumed virtual time flow. > What is 'virtual time flow'? In this scenario, it takes more than three month or year in real time. It is not efficient. In this connectathon, I have assumed participants exc

MedInfo 2010

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:42:52PM +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > > > 0) Adjust all workstation using NTP server > > > > There seems to be no reason for this, if we don't have to keep our > > workstations in synch. > > > > > 1) Tim send me the file recorded 'event1', '2009-10-30T12:18:11BST'

MedInfo 2010

Hi Shinji, >> What is 'virtual time flow'? > > In this scenario, it takes more than three month or year in real time. > It is not efficient. In this connectathon, I have assumed participants > exchange records that have ranged time, more than three month, within > some minutes > For example, > ? ?

MedInfo 2010

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:32:21 +0100 Roger Erens wrote: > Hi Shinji, > > >> What is 'virtual time flow'? > > > > In this scenario, it takes more than three month or year in real time. > > It is not efficient. In this connectathon, I have assumed participants > > exchange records that have ranged t

MedInfo 2010

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 14:33, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:32:21 +0100 > Roger Erens wrote: > >> Hi Shinji, >> >> >> What is 'virtual time flow'? >> > >> > In this scenario, it takes more than three month or year in real time. >> > It is not efficient. In this connectathon,

MedInfo 2010

Hi Roger, On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:45:43 +0100 Roger Erens wrote: > >> > In this scenario, it takes more than three month or year in real time. > >> > It is not efficient. In this connectathon, I have assumed participants > >> > exchange records that have ranged time, more than three month, within

MedInfo 2010

No News lately on the conecctathon. Is this still going on in private email sessions as it was before as I complained about? Or has it just been dropped completely since Sinji submitted his documents? --Tim -- *** Timothy Cook, MSc

MedInfo 2010

Hi, Tim I submitted a proposal and now it in in the review process. I have not received any review document from the office of MEDINFO 2010. When will we receive the reviewers' comment is not described explicitly in the medinfo site, but I guess Feburuary 2010 from the experience of f

MedInfo 2010

No private activity that I know of - Sam > -Original Message- > From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- > bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook > Sent: 17 November 2009 14:43 > To: For openEHR technical discussions > Subject: Me

MedInfo 2010

ot > received any review document from the office of MEDINFO 2010. When will > we receive the reviewers' comment is not described explicitly in the > medinfo site, but I guess Feburuary 2010 from the experience of former > medinfo. > I believe that our proposal will be accept,

MedInfo 2010

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

MedInfo 2010

; > and the openEHR Foundation? > > > > --Tim > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:30 +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > > > > > Hi, Tim > > > > > > I submitted a proposal and now it in in the review process. I have

MedInfo 2010

e review process. I have not > > received any review document from the office of MEDINFO 2010. When will > > we receive the reviewers' comment is not described explicitly in the > > medinfo site, but I guess Feburuary 2010 from the experience of former > > medinfo. > >

MedInfo 2010

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 21:10 +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > I realised we do not have much time to do them. > I cannot resolve every step only by myself. Please help me. This > connectathon needs many peoples' help. > I'm sure that you'll get enough assistance. > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:04:52

MedInfo 2010

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 13:10, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Sorry to late response. I have been troubled. > I list up what we have to implement for connectathon bellow: > i) Connectathon scineario(done) > http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/Connect-a-thon+Details So there's on

MedInfo 2010

Hi Tim, Thank you for your quick reply. On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:05:13 -0200 Tim Cook wrote: > Are you planning to send me a copy of the papers that were submitted? I send the papers individually. Best regards, -- KOBAYASHI, Shinji

MedInfo 2010

On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:56 +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Attached file is the document that I submitted. > Because the scientific demo page is limited in one page, the scenario > was shortned. > This manuscript has not been changed since I sent you before submission. In that cas

MedInfo 2010

Hi Roger, I do not think we need special time server, because we can use NTP server to adjust time. On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:11:05 +0100 Roger Erens wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 13:10, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > > > Sorry to late response. I have been troubled. > > I list up w

MedInfo 2010

On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 23:24 +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I do not think we need special time server, because we can use NTP > server to adjust time. I think you may want to re-read Roger's email and reconsider his reasoning. It is a solution to one of the issues I pointed out

MedInfo 2010

Hi Tim, and Roger I am sorry to misreading. Otherwise, this is the first time to challenge connectathon. I think we should suppose simple situation, such as same timezone, using NTP server(or omit subtle time mismatch) Best regards Shinji On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:58:51 -0200 Tim Cook wrote: > On

MedInfo 2010

On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 00:25 +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Tim, and Roger > > I am sorry to misreading. > Otherwise, this is the first time to challenge connectathon. I think we > should suppose simple situation, such as same timezone, using NTP > server(or omit subtle time mismatch) > > Be

MedInfo 2010

Hi Shinji, Thanks for pointing out that protocol to me. So you have experience with testing future datetimes? Roger On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 15:24, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I do not think we need special time server, because we can use NTP > server to adjust time.

MedInfo 2010

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:31:29 -0200 Tim Cook wrote: > > I am sorry to misreading. > > Otherwise, this is the first time to challenge connectathon. I think we > > should suppose simple situation, such as same timezone, using NTP > > server(or omit subtle time mismatch) > But Shinji, the "patient"

MedInfo 2010

Hi Roger, I have few experience in testing future datetimes. It was an appointing system. In some situation we need future date time especially in instruction entry. The entry type models has time attibute to record when the action/instruction. I think versioning system in openEHR is well designed

MedInfo 2010

Hello Shinji, On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 15:54, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Roger, > > I have few experience in testing future datetimes. It was an appointing > system. > In some situation we need future date time especially in instruction > entry. > The entry type models has time attibute to rec

MedInfo 2010

Hi Roger, I use UTC(Universal Time, Coordinated) for standardised terminology to represent date/time insted of GMT. UTC and GMT point almost same time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:38:08 +0100 Roger Erens wrote: > In order to make things easier

MedInfo 2010

Hi Shinji, > 0) NTP daemon is available anywhere in the Internet > We can adjust RTC within 10 mili seconds over the Internet automatically. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Time_Protocol > 3-9) If the recorded time means the event occured or event will occured, > we do not have to adjust w

Medinfo 2010 openEHR workshop

discussions Subject: RE: Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision Resending as plain text - bounced back due to file size when I replied - Hi, so it looks we are definitely going to have the clinical modelling workshop on Saturday. Looking at the discussions between Tony and Heather I note that

Medinfo 2010 openEHR workshop

___ > From: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org [ > openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Koray Atalag [ > k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz] > Sent: 17 May 2010 11:01 > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Cc: For openEHR technical discussions > Sub

Medinfo 2010 openEHR workshop

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Medinfo 2010 openEHR workshop

_ > From: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org [openehr-clinical-bounces at > openehr.org] On Behalf Of Koray Atalag [k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz] > Sent: 17 May 2010 11:01 > To: For openEHR clinical discussions > Cc: For openEHR technical discussions > Subject

Medinfo 2010 openEHR workshop

_ >> From: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org [openehr-clinical-bounces at >> openehr.org] On Behalf Of Koray Atalag [k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz] >> Sent: 17 May 2010 11:01 >> To: For openEHR clinical discussions >> Cc: For openEHR technical discussions

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

Hi! The recently published preliminary Medinfo 2010 programme at... http://www.medinfo2010.org/docs/Draft_Conference_Programme.pdf ...lists two openEHR tutorials in parallel... 1. OpenEHR I - IV (Saturday 11 September 9:00-17:00) 2. EHR implementation tips I-II (Saturday 11 September 9:00-12:30

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

ing to provoke! Regards, Tony Dr. Tony Shannon Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Clinical Lead for Informatics,Leeds Teaching Hospitals Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation +44.789.988 5068tony.shannon at nhs.net Erik Sundvall wrote: > Hi

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

job done and a view that the openEHR approach is the way to go... >> >> Happy to get bounced back on this. We havent had enough debate on this >> list of late, so again I'm trying to provoke! >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Tony >> >> D

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

0 13:43 To: Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust) Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions; For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision Hi Tony On 13/05/2010 9:17 AM, Tony Shannon wrote: Thanks Heather I see from the "clinical" pro

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision

0 5:43 a.m. To: Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust) Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions; For openEHR technical discussions Subject: Re: Medinfo 2010 openEHR tutorial collision On 13/05/2010 1:10 PM, Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust) wrote: Thanks Heather ? Sounds g

Medinfo 2010.. Re: clinically useful set of archetypes for a connectathon demo

On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 12:22 +0100, Tony Shannon wrote: > Thanks Eric > > I'll have to admit I dont fully understand that question... not sure if > thats a good or bad thing ;o) > > I am keen to help agree on a starter set of archetypes to use for the > demo, though I'm coming at this from purely

Medinfo 2010.. Re: clinically useful set of archetypes for a connectathon demo

Hi! In addition to deciding on archetypes to use, I believe circulating a couple of complete instance examples fairly soon (this week?) would be very helpful in detecting differences in specification interpretations. Having more than one archetype editor certainly helped detect differences and amb