On 04/04/2013 09:32 AM, Henning Heinold wrote:
Hi,
nice work, but I wonder why the u-boot needs a boot.scr. Is it that old or can
you switch it over to uEnv.txt so it is easier for people
to change kernel cmdline and other u-boot config stuff.
Bye Henning
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 03-04-13 21:04, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
> On 2013-04-03 20:38, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> So how is this different from https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox ?
>
> I am in contact with the author of that layer. My work started as a fork
> of that, s
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:50:46PM +0200, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations
> about this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox .
> The layer itself is hosted athttps://github.com/dv1/meta-cubox .
>
> This
Op 4 apr. 2013, om 00:52 heeft Philip Balister het
volgende geschreven:
> On 04/03/2013 05:43 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
>>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
Just l
Op 3 apr. 2013, om 23:43 heeft Otavio Salvador het
volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>>
>>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixi
On 04/03/2013 05:43 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>>
>>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>>> DISTRO policy in the ma
On 2013-04-04 00:40, Martin Jansa wrote:
Yes that looks correct, you can also find this thread
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/37055/ interesting (better on other
archive, but linuxtogo is down now).
Unfortunately that RFC was rejected, so DISTROs have to hardcode list of
supported MACHINE
Yes that looks correct, you can also find this thread
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/37055/ interesting (better on other
archive, but linuxtogo is down now).
Unfortunately that RFC was rejected, so DISTROs have to hardcode list of
supported MACHINEs and their defaulttunes, SHR does the same
On 2013-04-04 00:21, Khem Raj wrote:
On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
wrote:
Okay, I think I see the problem now. DEFAULTTUNES should not be set by the
machine config. So, removing it
and fixing the README accordingly take
On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
> wrote:
>> Okay, I think I see the problem now. DEFAULTTUNES should not be set by the
>> machine config. So, removing it
>> and fixing the README accordingly takes care of that. People who
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Carlos Rafael Giani
wrote:
> Okay, I think I see the problem now. DEFAULTTUNES should not be set by the
> machine config. So, removing it
> and fixing the README accordingly takes care of that. People who for example
> want hardfp then
> set DEFAULTTUNE ?= "marvellp
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>
>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>> DISTRO policy in the machine files by setting the tuning to
>> hardfloat. Don
Okay, I think I see the problem now. DEFAULTTUNES should not be set by
the machine config. So, removing it
and fixing the README accordingly takes care of that. People who for
example want hardfp then
set DEFAULTTUNE ?= "marvellpj4hf" in their local.conf . Is this correct?
On 2013-04-03 22:19,
Op 3 apr. 2013, om 22:07 heeft Philip Balister het
volgende geschreven:
> On 04/03/2013 03:57 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>>
>> Op 3 apr. 2013 om 21:34 heeft Philip Balister het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani
On 04/03/2013 03:57 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>
> Op 3 apr. 2013 om 21:34 heeft Philip Balister het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>>
>>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>>> D
Op 3 apr. 2013 om 21:34 heeft Philip Balister het
volgende geschreven:
> On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>>
>> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
>> DISTRO policy in the machine files by setting the tuning
On 04/03/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
>
> Just like https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox you're mixing
> DISTRO policy in the machine files by setting the tuning to
> hardfloat. Don't do that. If you want hardfloat, set that in your
> distro c
On 2013-04-03 20:38, Koen Kooi wrote:
So how is this different from https://github.com/naguirre/meta-cubox ?
I am in contact with the author of that layer. My work started as a fork
of that, since the layer did not work for me, but since I anyway was
changing pretty much all of it from the gr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 03-04-13 18:50, Carlos Rafael Giani schreef:
> Hello,
>
> I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations
> about this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox . The layer
> itself is hosted athttps://github.com/dv
On 3 April 2013 19:11, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
> Well, I have been told that New IT is a good source:
> https://www.newit.co.uk/shop/proddetail.php?prod=CuBox
So it is, thanks!
Ross
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.opene
On 2013-04-03 19:52, Khem Raj wrote:
On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
Hello,
I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations about
this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox .
The layer itself is hosted athttps://github.com/dv1/meta-
On 2013-04-03 20:05, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 3 April 2013 17:50, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations
about this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox .
Nice. More importantly, how can I get one in the UK. :)
Ross
___
On 3 April 2013 17:50, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
> I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations
> about this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox .
Nice. More importantly, how can I get one in the UK. :)
Ross
___
On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations
> about this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox .
> The layer itself is hosted athttps://github.com/dv1/meta-cubox .
>
> This layer intr
Hello,
I have created a BSP layer for the SolidRun Cubox platform. Informations about
this device can be found athttp://solid-run.com/cubox .
The layer itself is hosted athttps://github.com/dv1/meta-cubox .
This layer introduces a new machine, new tunes for the CuBox' Marvell PJ4
processor,
25 matches
Mail list logo
