Re: [openflow-discuss] Clarification about NORMAL and LOCAL action

2011-10-12 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:17:49AM +0100, Thapar, Vishal wrote: > If you program LOCAL Action for a pkt that would've been forwarded > normally, what do you expect switch to do? Note that when I say switch > I mean a hybrid switch. > > 1. Drop pkt. > 2. Fwd pkt. > 3. Throw error and not let you ad

Re: [openflow-discuss] zhesen's email address

2011-10-12 Thread kk yap
Hi Zhesen, The components are meant for the zaku branch in noxrepo.org. Regards KK On 12 October 2011 11:29, Zhesen ZHANG wrote: > Hi KK, > > We cannot build the bicast on the nox-0.8.9 since there is no > flowdb, mobiledb and routeinstaller in the source code. > > We put the bicast under the n

Re: [openflow-discuss] bug report: array access boundary error with FlowVisor

2011-10-12 Thread Nicholas Bastin
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 18:28, Masahiko Takahashi wrote: > The following seems to be a problem with FlowVisor. > > In the spec, vendor extension such as OFPST_VENDOR and OFPAT_VENDOR is > defined as 0x. However, FlowVisor has tables that doesn't assume > 0x (or -1 in signed short). For exa

[openflow-discuss] Problem of userspace openflow switch dealing with packets on virtualized machines

2011-10-12 Thread Fang Wang
Hi I am facing problems in using userspace openflow switch dealing with arp packets on a set of virtual machines. I had three Linux namespace based virtual machines set up in three physical machines respectively. The ip-address of each port on the three physical machines was set in the same subnet