On 1.4.2010 9:23, Praveen Kumar wrote:
Hi,
we have some pro*c files with the extention .ph and .ppc. when I index it, the
references are not resolved it seems.
Although .ph and .ppc files are similar to .h and .c files respectively. I want
to know if there is any possiblity for mapping my .ph
On 1.4.2010 18:23, Darren Greene wrote:
I have a windows setup that appears to be working for the most part but is
leaving many files out of one of my projects out for some reason. I've got a
local copy of a subversion repository that I do a svn update on hourly, then
run a reindex it hourly
On 13.4.2010 12:31, Kiffin Gish wrote:
I added a new project to an existing setup as follows:
$ svn checkout http://xxx/svn/project.new/trunk stage1/source/project.new
$ cp -rp stage1/source/project.new/ stage2/source/
and then restarted opengrok.sh and the glassfish server.
Can
$0 {start|stop}"
73 exit 1
74 ;;
75 esac
76
77 exit 0
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:55 +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote:
On 13.4.2010 12:31, Kiffin Gish wrote:
I added a new project to an existing setup as follows:
$ svn checkout http://xxx/svn/project.new/trun
On 13.4.2010 15:16, Lubos Kosco wrote:
indexer.sh seems in need of ADD_PROJECTS variable:
(not sure if your version is the same)
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/tools/smf/indexer.sh#57
or manually add -p to have it always there ... also if your setup is
simple and you
and indexer.sh weren't tested for a long time and serve just
as examples lately ...
--
L
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 15:16 +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote:
indexer.sh seems in need of ADD_PROJECTS variable:
(not sure if your version is the same)
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/t
On 13.4.2010 22:24, James Hartley wrote:
I'm considering running {OpenGrok on two servers to reduce single
points of failure. Has anyone done this? Are there obvious files
which need to be synchronized?
your sources
/var/opengrok
- if you use default OpenGrok script ...
the rest is in the
On 15.4.2010 19:36, Bruce Furber wrote:
Thanks I like the way it handles "unprintable" characters now. This
version replaces them with the square box � preventing unxeplained
indents. Prior to release 8? as little as a single ¢ Cent sign would
prevent a member from being indexed.
this i
On 15.4.2010 20:57, Alan Kaplan wrote:
hi, wondering if someone can answer this. So I have svn and cvs working copies
in my SRC_ROOT. I am generating an index (with history), and this seemed to
work well. Then I added a dir into src_root that wasn't a svn or cvs working
copy, and the indexer s
On 20.4.2010 0:37, Ajaya wrote:
Upgraded to RC1 on Windows. Tomcat 6.0.26& Java 1.6.
The XREF browser is displaying wierd.
Windows, Firefox 3.6.3 : Right scroll bar missing in the browser window. have
to use space bar to navigate to next page.
Windows, IE 7 : Page doesn't display on load.
filed
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15690
will be fixed in 0.9
--
L
On 20.4.2010 8:27, Lubos Kosco wrote:
On 20.4.2010 0:37, Ajaya wrote:
Upgraded to RC1 on Windows. Tomcat 6.0.26& Java 1.6.
The XREF browser is displaying wierd.
Windows, Firefox 3.6.3 : Right sc
Your webapp is trying to lock lucene index it seems
for what is worth we got rid of index locks in later versions
in 0.6.1 there was a parameter to disable them: -l off when doing index
... maybe your webapp clashes with reindex, hmm ?
anyhow it's either permissions of user who runs web app
On 22.4.2010 23:08, Zach Carter wrote:
On Thursday 22 April 2010 12:58:51 Lubos Kosco wrote:
Your webapp is trying to lock lucene index it seems
for what is worth we got rid of index locks in later versions
in 0.6.1 there was a parameter to disable them: -l off when doing index
... maybe
On 27.4.2010 21:42, Jim R. Wilson wrote:
Hi grok devs,
Hi jimbojw
I'm running opengrok 0.7 on Windows Server 2008 atop Glassfish. My
0.9 RC1 can be downloaded from
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/files
it has some fixes for windows environments, but
mainly i
On 27.4.2010 21:51, David Siefert wrote:
Hi All-
I would like to be able to search the history as well as the head of
the source tree. Does {OpenGrok support indexing of subversion
history? How would I enable this?
yes, it does
first thing is that opengrok works on a checkout - hence you
Hmm,
incremental history updates were one of goals of having history cache
moved to javadb (see readme file on how to setup javadb historycache
instead of default xml.gz files -
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/README.txt#260 )
looking at
http://src.opensolaris.org/sour
ds in the way to improve the OpenGrok script to support
Gentoo too !
I'd like to see OpenGrok being able to have a switch to say that you
want javadb history cache and it will setup the necessary stuff for you
... that would be nice!
xing the fingers
L
2010/4/30 Lubos Kosco:
Hmm,
inc
On 1.5.2010 3:52, David Siefert wrote:
Hi All-
I was wondering why it is necessary to manually download JFlex and
JUnit instead of keeping these two jars in the Mercurial repository
and referencing them appropriately in the project? It would be nicer
just to be able to check out the source a
OK, so I tried similar query with one of our c++ projects and full
search was able to find this (0.9 trunk, will be released later this week)
BUT when I did a definition search for foo::Date it gave same reply as
you had (but without error from parser, since Knut fixed the queryparser
a week
On 11.5.2010 20:57, Mark Eramo wrote:
Hi Mark,
I haven't seen this error myself, but it looks like Tomcat cannot find
the classes in opengrok.jar. Does your source.war file contain
opengrok.jar in its WEB-INF/lib directory?
...
Hi Knut,
Thanks for the reply. I actually resolved thi
Mark
(adding opengrok-discuss@opensolaris.org just because this is a general
explanation & plea ... maybe it would make sense to post it somewhere
else for people to easier get into opengrok workflow or improve the
docs, hmm ?)
the flow should be like on
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/downloa
On 13.5.2010 7:58, Tony, Tian wrote:
"bare clone" means we do not have working files in the "project" directory. We only have
a ".git" repository in it.
no, there must be files which are "checked out", opengrok will not do
the checkout for you
hence also another implication from this - y
On 13.5.2010 9:10, Tony, Tian wrote:
Hi, Lubos
Thank you for your help.
In my opinion, "have project per branch/release" will result in file size
occupation blowing up as the branch/tag/release increased.
yes, that can be the case (zfs dedup might mitigate here I guess, but
your point
On 13.5.2010 23:14, Mark Eramo wrote:
I solved this mystery, I had to copy the lib folder to doc/lib and it starts
the indexing.
The run.bat is in the doc folder so it must expect to see the jars in a lib
folder directly below where it runs.
Mark
Huh,
thanks, this is I guess problem I i
On 18.5.2010 9:03, Jun wrote:
I deployed opengrok 0.9 on a git repository, when xref a source file, click History
button, I can see the commit history of the file. Then I pick 2 versions, and click
Compare button, the page has nothing under "Home | History | Annotate | Download
..." line.
I ch
On 18.5.2010 9:38, Tom Spengler wrote:
do I understand it right ?
when I switch to database based index, I get incremental subversion indexing
implicit ?
yes, that was the main goal of javadb historycache (index will always be
lucene)
(default historycache is gzipped xml files)
note tha
On 18.5.2010 10:30, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
On 05/18/10 09:21 AM, Lubos Kosco wrote:
On 18.5.2010 9:03, Jun wrote:
I deployed opengrok 0.9 on a git repository, when xref a source file, click History
button, I can see the commit history of the file. Then I pick 2 versions, and
On 18.5.2010 11:21, Jun wrote:
Yeah... I upgraded IE to 8.0, still has the issue.
Another finding, if click the resize button of IE window, the diff content will
show up immediately.
weird, I cannot reproduce even with resizing the window, or starting up
IE8 in small window and opening th
version of my explorer is 8.0.6001.18904
kah tried similar on XP3+IE8 and it works for him
(on win2003 it doesn't ...)
what Windows version do you have ?
--
L
On 18.5.2010 12:57, Jun wrote:
Chrome doesn't have the problem
___
opengrok-discuss
On 19.5.2010 3:09, Jun wrote:
My system is Windows XP version 2002, SP3
IE: 8.0.6001.18702CO
hmm, I installed some IE compatibility view update from latest updates
and we are not able to reproduce this problem anymore ...
I will however check the css we use again to see if I could somehow
On 20.5.2010 15:52, Lubos Kosco wrote:
On 19.5.2010 3:09, Jun wrote:
My system is Windows XP version 2002, SP3
IE: 8.0.6001.18702CO
hmm, I installed some IE compatibility view update from latest updates
and we are not able to reproduce this problem anymore ...
I will however check the css we
On 21.5.2010 10:51, Manickam, Vasanth [Tech] wrote:
When I do not include the class path I get the exception
The derbyclient.jar file is available in the same directory as opengrok.jar
I think we hardcoded this into ./lib/
where ./ is where opengrok.jar is
I will push https://defect.openso
On 25.5.2010 17:29, Vasanth wrote:
I see that on IE8 there are a few issues
* When clicking on a particular line from the result the page that comes up
just has the top header and no data. Seems to work fine in firefox where the
data page starts from the line that was clicked.
* Since the t
On 25.5.2010 18:48, Manickam, Vasanth [Tech] wrote:
Thanks for the info.
Was wondering if there a patch or a quick hack I could use until this has been
fixed. Haven't had a look at the css yet.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/980302
might be the fix
(depends on your windows version)
Knut
Hi Xinfeng,
can you please log this as a bug in
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/enter_bug.cgi?product=opengrok (you
must be logged in to opensolaris bugzilla)
so we can keep track of it ?
thanks much for the report!
Lubos
P.S. for reference you can put this bug number there as the one w
On 26.5.2010 10:29, Manickam, Vasanth [Tech] wrote:
This seems to occur on a fully patched system as well...
But when this issue occurs resizing the window back and forth seems to cause
the display to be fixed...
yes, it is only triggered when the window is smaller than history
contents &
On 27.5.2010 12:53, Grzegorz Kokosinski wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any possibility to disable support for control version system
(perforce in my case). My sources are synchronized by another program,
so there is no need to do it again by opengrok. Its only make whole
process of indexation long
On 14.6.2010 7:51, seadog wrote:
Right now there is a -i option for ignoring certain things like files. I'd like to add a
-I option that would function similarly except it would be "include only". It
doesn't seem this would be too hard to add (basically similar IgnoredNames.java). The
only thi
On 15.6.2010 4:35, seadog wrote:
I'll have to check progress when I go back to work. I was checking the java and
ctags processes in ProcessExplorer and there was no CPU activity for either.
I'll let you know on Wednesday.
Well
I don't want to be a pest, but that's why we have OpenSolaris
Please ... try to troubleshoot
if by any chance you know which files cause the problematic state
("hang") and you can send them over, then file
a bug on http://defect.opensolaris.org (category development/opengrok)
and attach the problematic file
thanks much
Lubos
On 15.6.2010 18:55, seadog
On 17.6.2010 19:15, Eramo, Mark wrote:
Hi Lubos,
I have OpenGrok 0.9 up and running using LDAP Authentication. It
is working great.
hey, this is great, can you send us an howto on how to setup your
webcontainer to do this ?
The only issue I have run into is if we select ALL projects
On 17.6.2010 16:17, David Maxera wrote:
Hi,
Cau David ;)
I'm afraid I have yet another problem with CVS history. I don't see in
OpenGrok 0.9 history of my sources. The link in the top of the page is
grayed out. If I manually enter a path like
.../source/history/myproject/SRC/myfile.c, I j
On 21.6.2010 19:23, Bernd Kolb wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans to implement a caller / callee traversal as described in
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12004 in one of the upcoming
versions? I think this would be a *really* great feature?
well, I am +1 and I also miss th
On 22.6.2010 14:08, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
On 06/21/10 10:31 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
On 06/21/10 04:46, anand bibhuti wrote:
Is there any code browser available for python . I need to study the
source code of IPS . In absence of any tool like Cscope or Ctags it is
vey tedious to understand the
On 23.6.2010 1:18, Bruce Furber wrote:
Me too.
Something like the way google toolbar works would be great too. Hilite
any piece of text and click search.
Yes, this seems like a nice idea too and we have jquery inside so
implementation will be rather easy
if this isn't filed as bug, can I as
get the hourly package/tgz from:
http://helius.sfbay.sun.com:7000/hudson/job/OGPackage/ws/dist/
enjoy
L
On 23.6.2010 0:06, James C. McPherson wrote:
On 22/06/10 10:35 PM, Lubos Kosco wrote:
On 22.6.2010 14:08, Vladimir Kotal wrote:
...
Which brings us to this RFE:
https
On 23.6.2010 12:56, seadog wrote:
Well I gave up on trying to set up a correct Eclipse project. NetBeans just
magically worked.
I think the reason for the hang is that the CTags generated output is malformed
and not what CTags.java readTags method is expecting. The case on line 161 is
never h
On 23.6.2010 13:45, seadog wrote:
By a malformed tags file I meant that CTags doesn't generate anymore output
after hitting the bad characters. When it gets to the line with the bad
characters, it just adds the terminator string to the line right after where
the bad characters occur (not on a
We NEED JDK 1.6 since {OpenGrok 0.8.1
and tomcat HAS to use JDK 1.6 too
afaik S10 x86 doesn't have JDK1.6 yet (due in S10u9), so you need to
download it manually, or wait for the patches to come out
(to see what I mean check $ ls -l /usr/jdk/ )
I have a separate download of tomcat and jdk on
On 12.7.2010 18:31, cici cici wrote:
I got a local patch to do that, so I can have more colors in the style.css.
If people think it is useful for the community, I will work on committing it to
the tree.
btw, OpenGrok is awesome!
Thanks and we would be happy if you could send a patch over !
W
On 12.7.2010 18:34, cici cici wrote:
what do you think?
yes, this might make sense(after all most of IDEs have this ... right
now one has to use Ctrl+f to navigate through the file) ... we could
have it hidden on the right/left side and it could be triggered by a
button from top header if n
t too (it needs
investigation, since the problem might come from ctags)
will need to track it on http://defect.opensolaris.org/ otherwise we'll
forget ...
thanks cici cici , cool stuff, keep it up !
Lubos
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Lubos Kosco <mailto:lubos.ko...@sun.com>> wrote:
s been
fixed in the development trunk:
changeset: 1022:c56753be2bc2
user:Lubos Kosco
date:Mon May 31 10:06:10 2010 +0200
summary: Bug #15954 - teamware repository not detected anymore
___
opengrok-discuss mailing list
o
On 26.7.2010 16:59, alex wrote:
This error is coming from the web app. There are no errors I see in the log
after running the index. The process running tomcat has the cvs in it's PATH.
With some files I am able to get history.
I'd switch to the user who runs tomcat ( su - tomcatuser ) and t
Is the user who runs indexing the same as who runs the webapp server?
Does he have permission to write to /var/opengrok ?
If not, please make sure he(tomcat?) owns /var/opengrok and that
indexing is run under tomcat user as well
it seems this might be the culprit ...
--
L
On 27.7.2010 21:21
thanks for the report
this seems to be caused by the change I made ... with 0.8.1 you could
doubleclick on even the option scrollbar, which was a bug reported by
safari users
I've added the double-click js action just to respective (which
is btw. the proper behaviour according to W3C -
http:
On 27.8.2010 4:04, seadog wrote:
I recently added a new file extension to my indexes. I did it by using a config
file for ctags to specify −−langmap=c:+.hh and used the new -I option in the
trunk version of opengrok. It indexed the files (I'm using projects) but I
noticed it used Plain and Ja
On 10.9.2010 16:53, Bruce Furber wrote:
When upgrading from Opengrok 0.8 to 0.9, the new webapp will work with
the old index.
hmm, I am happy it works, although it shouldn't ;)
I did some changes that make the webapp only work with latest index, but
most of the stuff is backwards compatible,
On 15.9.2010 5:24, seadog wrote:
I finally remembered to check the xrefs. The correct folder structure and
gzipped files are there. That leads me to think that the issue might be in the
web application. Would DirectoryList.java
(http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/src/org/op
You can try to check logs of opengrok in DATA_ROOT/log directory for hints
also tomcat usually shows hints, but if the repositoryinfo is missing
from config, the problem is somewhere with indexing (that it didn't
pickup the repos)
hmm?
Lubos
On 28.9.2010 17:47, Kent Cowgill wrote:
StdInvoca
I'll take care of that
it actually heavily depends on symbol tokenizer for appropriate
analyzer, but since most of
them are the same, we should really make it obvious from help.
Thanks for the point, will fix, or feel free to send a patch (will
integrate it for you)! ;)
Lubos
On 4.11.2010 1
or\+ 1 will both find +1 and + 1
- "Lubos Kosco" wrote:
I'll take care of that
it actually heavily depends on symbol tokenizer for appropriate
analyzer, but since most of
them are the same, we should really make it obvious from help.
Thanks for the poi
you need 0.9 or trunk version to get this working
---
L
On 5.11.2010 11:47, j...@weedlight.ch wrote:
Hi
I want to use german umlauts in my sourcecode but they aren't visible at all in
the opengrok source code browsing servlets.
How can I fix this?
I have debian GNU/Linux stable and opengrok-0
Hmm, can you please open a bug in http://defect.opensolaris.org/
and attach the problematic source file please ?
It should just work ...
thank you
Lubos
On 5.11.2010 14:09, j...@weedlight.ch wrote:
Hi
Now I got 0.9.0 binary version but still having no umlauts. Is there something
that I need t
the time to write code)
what would be good to fix when you use this software and file bugs
against it! Note that this is just a summary of how many changes each
person made which doesn't necessarily reflect how significant each
change was. (inspect the history log with "hg log -v -
Hmm
my wild guess is that you need to regenerate the indexes after you moved
the directories deeper
I would also suggest removing old indexes(xref, spellcheck and historycache)
you can try just moving the whole /data/opengrok/data aside
and reindex from scratch
the depth is by default 3 and y
Also I suggest you move from run.sh to script OpenGrok we ship along
I try to test it against debian and it usually works
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/OpenGrok
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/installdescription
let me know how it goes
--
L
On 10.1.
The other option is to try out OpenGrok script which is bundled and
should have most of options like you do, ev. you set up some OPENGROK_
options to modify what you want ...
also your path has to have cvs and svn (even for webapp container)
hmm?
Lubos
On 12.1.2011 20:24, Trond Norbye wrote
but not History.
However selecting Annotate the browser just waits and never returns.
So I think my issues are in part with my environment.
Thanks,
On 1/12/2011 4:14 PM, Lubos Kosco wrote:
The other option is to try out OpenGrok script which is bundled and
should have most of options like you do,
Well I'd try to print in Chrome or Safari (or IE?)
with the opengrok css frames it seems I probably touched something not
that fully implemented in older browsers ... (but webkit handles most of
stuff just fine)
Well it might make sense to rewrite the frames to be more browser
friendly ... but
What is the koders method?
How do they do it?
(got a link?)
curious
L
On 9.2.2011 11:39, opengrok-user wrote:
Thanks V.
I'll add comment to the bug.
Not sure the 7zip (GUI) idea is really the best way to go, perhaps
more along the lines of the jar analyser or even the Koders method.
- K
if it's a doc going to project pages, then I probably could give you
access to change the xwiki directly, if you give me your opensolaris
credentials
if it's a change in code docs, please post a patch, or even better file
a bug, with the patch and your OCA/SCA # and I will (review, spellchec
Subscribe to bug
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17189
and send cookies to Vladimir so he pushes the code finally ;)
--
L
On 30.3.2011 10:51, gaurav kochhar wrote:
We are planning to use it for some 3000 projects. We wanted some logical
grouping of te sources (which would m
most probably yes
last time I tried one of:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/installdescription#HOptionalsetupofsecuritymanagerfortomcat
worked ...
obviously refer to tomcat guides and ubuntu mods on how to do it
properly nowadays
--
L
On 13.3.2011 22:00, Deepankar Sharm
So there is no option to change it yet
and please don't try to play with parameter n (Knut just fixed it, seems
when I tried to introduce paging I did forget about some checks so it's
not working fully
thnx for the fix Knut:
http://www.norbye.org/hg/opengrok/trunk/index.cgi/rev/bfe828cbcc84 !
This isn't entirely true,
since we try to have the webapp return xhtml strict web pages which ARE
xml (look at page source / header)
so if you look at returned search result, they should be valid xhtml and
you should be able to transform them to anything you need !
Structure should be easy
Danke schon! :)
--
L
On 7.4.2011 16:59, Jens Elkner wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 09:40:25AM +0200, Lubos Kosco wrote:
This isn't entirely true,
since we try to have the webapp return xhtml strict web pages which ARE xml
(look at page source / header)
so if you lo
I actually run it in my jenkins setup ...
and try to make it report 0 warnings
--
L
On 15.4.2011 17:23, Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
is actually anybody using PMD? Or better, does anybody care, if I remove
this annoying bloat?
Regards,
jel.
___
opengro
On 19.4.2011 19:21, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
gaurav kochhar writes:
Would like to know more about the "-S" option?
This is the flag that makes the indexer check if the source code is
managed by a version control system, and index the history if it's
available.
I'm actually looking for some
Great work Jens!
I am actually very very happy someone started the cleanup of jsps
and I am looking forward to the monster patch ;)
just regarding code reviews - if you can split it into phases it would
be cool, if not I guess we can try to review it, ev. accept it and fix
whatever regression
Oh yes ... and I love what you did to the default theme, looks much
better now :)
--
L
On 6.5.2011 21:26, Lubos Kosco wrote:
Great work Jens!
I am actually very very happy someone started the cleanup of jsps
and I am looking forward to the monster patch ;)
just regarding code reviews - if
yes, I use mq too :)
--
L
On 7.5.2011 20:35, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Lubos Kosco writes:
Great work Jens!
I am actually very very happy someone started the cleanup of jsps
and I am looking forward to the monster patch ;)
just regarding code reviews - if you can split it into phases it
t for pdf/office files
(analyzers and some easy draft of xrefs) ...
--
L
On 8.5.2011 11:50, opengrok-user wrote:
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=343
*From:* opengrok-user
*To:* opengrok-user ; Lubos
OpenGrok should index everything
afaik no deduplication is done
if you can somehow reproduce the problems you saw, or if possible use
OpenGrok script instead of manual execution of the jar it would be great
(OpenGrok script has various environment vars, that can customize
installation in case
On 11.5.2011 20:03, Jens Elkner wrote:
Hi,
are there any chances to integrate the suggested changes wrt. #18281
relatively soon?
Actually I tend to have a look at the indexer problem (which is possibly
rooted @lucene), but on the other side not really, since I don't want
well lucene in opengr
On 14.5.2011 13:11, Trond Norbye wrote:
this is one of the things I really love with git.. the ability for me to "edit"
the
I use mq for this, but yes, if it works out of box it most probably is
better ...
--
L
___
opengrok-discuss mailing list
op
Could you also try to open the index using luke and check on number of
records please?
Not sure if just parsing logging is the best measurement method ... with
luke you get exact numbers of what is indexed (per every database - path
database is one of them and is what you're looking for)
--
Well
I'd put it in different way
with OCA you donate the code to {Opengrok project(hence to Oracle)
and it will be pushed in under your name by one of guys who have push
access after review (e.g. Knut, Trond, ... )
without it if you don't mind(hence give us all rights to your code) one
of us
When we are already talking about symlinks ...
there is still the bug with looping symlinks (which point to the same
dir), where indexer will just get stuck and loops through them
so ... beware of such symlinks, they can make your indexing take days ;)
--
L
On 8.6.2011 16:51, Jens Elkner wrot
Oh and did I say symlinks in source code is a messy practice?
Would be curious why you have them there in first place ...
--
L
On 8.6.2011 17:06, Lubos Kosco wrote:
When we are already talking about symlinks ...
there is still the bug with looping symlinks (which point to the same
dir
I think it is in all versions of IE
it's a bug in IE imho, which breaks displaying of css "frames"
(basically css blocks, since the code block is inside css block with a
sidebar), fwiw I am quite sure I wrote it according to standards (and
firefox, chrome, safari, opera work with it properly)
so try as a workaround to work with maximized IE window, or resize it
(it should refresh the css and show contents)
regarding css code which "causes" this I didn't find a workaround there
... yet (and unfortunately I don't have much time to spare on this :( )
--
L
On 9.6.2011 13:27, gaurav
your name should be on the bug which was used to push this patch, hmm? ;)
--
L
On 11.6.2011 16:49, Trond Norbye wrote:
On 11. juni 2011, at 16.47, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Oops... Sorry! That's a bit difficult to see from the commit log, so I
just guessed. Thanks, Trond! :)
Hehe.. Another
Would be cool to add below along with
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=17849
looking for generic way how to manage ctags, who can design it ?
--
L
On 12.6.2011 19:10, Felix Annan wrote:
Thanks for incorporating the changes. I appreciate your efforts to improve this
product.
according to http://www.norbye.org/jenkins/job/OpenGrok/changes
some change of yours went in, try to pull and compare it (seems tronds
diff links are broken ;) )
--
L
On 17.6.2011 15:13, Karthik Rajagopalan wrote:
Hi Trond,
Did you get a chance to try the patch I re-submitted again?
-Kar
Well, you can try to take them out to a separate directory(chmoded 755),
chmod them 644 and see if they will be indexed like this
ev. create a bug and attach them we can take a look and try to reproduce
in our installs
thanks for the report
L
On 18.6.2011 1:52, Doug McLaren wrote:
On Fri, J
No, thank YOU Doug for all the research!
We should try to address those bugs asap, since from where i stand they
are a big priority fix,
especially if the problem can be there for other than jar analyzers too ...
(I changed the jar analyzer library in 0.9/0.10 and didn't do much
research on s
What do you suggest then?
(feel free to send a patch)
It seems we(not sure if it was me or Knut :-P ) built the final .tgz
using http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/opengrok/trunk/build.xml#317
on some linux system (so it seems it might have been me :( )
hence the confusion
I'll try to bui
On 28.6.2011 16:26, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> Lubos Kosco wrote:
>
>> What do you suggest then?
>> (feel free to send a patch)
>>
>> It seems we(not sure if it was me or Knut :-P ) built the final .tgz
>> using http://src.opensolaris.org/sour
What is that file? Any chance it's a .jar ? :)
You can use option -i to make it skip the file ...
most probably Opengrok script has an environment variable to do it, if
not, we should add one (can you file a bug please?)
cheers
Lubos
On 4.7.2011 10:46, gaurav kochhar wrote:
I have a huge fi
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
