Re: [openhealth] Senator Endorses VistA for EHR Standard

2006-01-28 Thread Nandalal Gunaratne
Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the software is released under GPL, does that make it any less Free if the organization developing it is a commercial entity? Not in the proper sense of the word free as in freedom that FOSS exemplifies. But for a lot of people who think OSS

Re: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-28 Thread Nandalal Gunaratne
Rick Stockton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Nandalal Gunaratne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone advise me, why does OpenEMR tend to have so many checkboxes in its forms? (I am without a clue, just a sentence or two is sufficient.) Free form

RE: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-28 Thread Koray Atalag
Hi to all, Regarding the GUI and checkboxes paradigm; I would strongly suggest that you look at: http://www.anoto.com http://www.anoto.com/ http://www.anotofunctionality.com/ These guys I met in 2001 at Hannovery CeBit fair...The solution I believe is not computerise healtcare

RE: [openhealth] Re: Software Developers, BOTH too rigid and too complex

2006-01-28 Thread Koray Atalag
One important/urgent notice: Pls. do not take my prior post as advertising of a company; and I assure you that I have no financial interest with this company... So it is just an example for a paradigm shift in User Interface and Human-Machine Interaction domains... Their business model

[openhealth] FW: FreeTerminology.org is UP!

2006-01-28 Thread Koray Atalag
Hi FOSS people, Not always I do objections and create nebulizing clouds, but also do some useful work ;) So, in spite of the possibility/fear of ending up in a prison :-) I have taken my individual liberty with good will to create the following project at SF. And it was accepted lightning