On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:59:38PM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
Speaking of Python, you might be interested in the GNUmed project, which
also targets primary care settings, and the GNUmed people are very
interested in all sorts of architectural and design issues.
Agree. I'm reading this thread
Tim Churches wrote:
Paul wrote:
We made a fairly conscious decision for
example, not to try to represent the HL7 RIM, as it's been our
experience that work in that domain is high on promise but lacking in
successful, well vetted implementations. If on the other hand, you
believe there's
This is just the type of discussion we should have in
the May OSHCA Conference!!
FOSS interoperability - from theory to practice
Nandalal
--- David Forslund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
Paul wrote:
Hi Dave,
Our API is built around the standard health
objects
You're right, Nandalal. I was given the contact to the OpenMRS to invite
them to the OSHCA conference in May by the new director of ICT for IDRC
as I understand that the project in Africa is quite exciting. As soon as
I get a firm commitment on the funding for scholarships for those
outside
Hi Molly, I'm one of the co-founders of OpenMRS. Let me know how I
can be helpful to you. Still trying to catch up with the community
here, and it seems I need to do some due diligence on OSHCA.
Best,
-Paul
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Molly Cheah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right,
What a wonderful discussion. I am so glad to have Regenstrief's
OpenMRS at the table! I also know there are other lurkers out there
(you know who you are!) who can add to the robust discussion. But my
purpose here is to highlight one point. Paul, Dave and Tim have all
mentioned not
Open source efforts/software like OpenMRS, WorldVistA (VistA Office
etc.), OSCAR etc. that are focused on diffusion/uptake and continuous
improvement. All need to have practical tools methods etc. to work
effectively in the heterogeneous health IT ecosystem. Building on Tim's
view:
I
Tim Churches wrote:
David Forslund wrote:
I was referring to making aspects such as the user interface and
business logic as general as possible, while still keeping users happy
by providing a slick, fiendly and productive interface and associated
conveniences. Inter-system
David Forslund wrote:
It does appear that programming languages seem to be the biggest barrier
for this particular open source community. Some like Java, some like Python,
some like PHP,
etc. That was the value of the IDL used in COAS, because it is language
independent
and really
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 05:32:54PM +1100, Tim Churches wrote:
surprisingly tricky and fragile). But it does support dataset
versioning, so that the latest version of source data can be loaded into
a new dataset in the background while users continue to use an existing
Thomas Beale wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
The openEHR model is probably relevant - it can be viewed as a more
evolved form of the two-level model which OpenEMR (and the Regenstrief
Clinic for several decades before that) uses. The openEHR people have
put forward their work as the basis for an
Tim Churches wrote:
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Well, the path of least resistance here is to scan it and
use it as a background image in some text editor or other so
that what you type appears to be written into the fields
while it is (technically) written on top of the background
image. We then
Paul,
A question regarding OpenMRS data entry forms. I notice form this wiki
page: http://openmrs.org/wiki/FormEntry_Technical_Overview - that
Microsoft InfoPath is used for form-based data collection in OpenMRS. I
think, and correct me if I am wrong, that means that sites running
OpenMRS need to
UCLA had developed a very good scanning OCR solution . but I don't
think it was pure FOSS will ask.
Joseph
Tim Churches wrote:
Tim Churches wrote:
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Well, the path of least resistance here is to scan it and
use it as a background image in some text editor or
Hi Tim, thanks for your interest in investigating collaborating with
us.
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Tim Churches [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NetEpi Analysis was designed to deal with the types of data and
analyses
which you mention - for example, apart from supporting complex
cross-tabs
Hi Karsten,
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Karsten Hilbert
Agree. I'm reading this thread with interest. I have been
interested in the Concept Dictionary approach ever since I
learned about OpenMRS a year ago or so. There's a strong
camp opposed to EAV-only schemata. I have a nagging
Molly, thanks for the information. I've passed this information onto
my colleagues and I'll let you know their thoughts soon.
Best,
-Paul
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Dr Molly Cheah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your offer Paul. You've probably missed OSHCA's call for
Paul wrote:
Thanks for this overview. There are so many layers to this whole
data analysis aspect of medical record repositories. Thinking from
left to right, there's the whole set of challenges around
converting stacked database models (where there's one row per
clinical observation)
18 matches
Mail list logo
