Agreed. What we could really use is a comprehensive biopsychosocial (i.e.,
biomedical, psychological and social) data set of signs, symptoms,
treatments, history, etc. to help guide the development of health
information tools that would be of meaningful use to clinicians, researchers
and
I've just posted an original definition of meaningful use, which opposes
the HIMSS defintion. The definition is tied to the clinical decision
support and patient-centered cognitive support, and stresses the need to
increase care value (effectiveness and efficiency). Feel free to use an
portions
are the template for how a patent-holder
and a community might potentially work together. Should not have used 'you'
in this context. Sorry.
-FT
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Stephen Beller
sbel...@...sbeller%40nhds.com
wrote:
Although it's easy to resent your implication
My comments over the past few days are in response to Fred's new initiative in
which I thought they may have come up with a novel way bridge the
FOSS-proprietary divide. I was mistaken. Nevertheless, since I still believe in
FOSS and in promoting low cost/resource conserving solutions for
, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Stephen Beller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:sbeller%40nhds.com wrote:
I offered an Excel-based macro that converts an XML-based CCD to a clean
CSV, which I assume the FOSS PHRs can consume thereby solving this
limitation. We've successfully incorporated that macro to import the CCD
, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Tel: +64 (9) 373 7599 ext. 87199
Fax: +64 (9) 308 2377
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:koray%40cs.auckland.ac.nz
Stephen Beller wrote:
Please explain what you mean by CCR or HL7 CDA *concepts* . Do you
mean the
actual strings/terms used within the XML markup tags
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Beller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had lengthy, and sometimes heated, debates with leaders of the
open
source community about the value of having both FOSS and proprietary
software systems. I made the case that inventors who hold patents for
truly
I've had lengthy, and sometimes heated, debates with leaders of the open
source community about the value of having both FOSS and proprietary
software systems. I made the case that inventors who hold patents for
truly original and useful breakthrough software programs—and who are
compassionate,
@yahoogroups.com, Wm. Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Stephen, thanks to you and the thoughtful responses of your
correspondents. I essentially agree with the responses!
Cheers,
Bill
Stephen Beller wrote:
FYI - I just responded to two excellent comments on my post about
Bill's FOSS-COSS
FYI - I just responded to two excellent comments on my post about
Bill's FOSS-COSS philosophy distinction, which is at:
a href=https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?
blogID=25132358postID=5801635888685043227page=1this link./a
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Beller [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello Lopo,
Thanks for sharing your ideas! I sincerely appreciate your input.
You are more knowledgeable than me concerning all these alternate
means to e-mail. Just to clarify the e-mail solution I mentioned,
note that it (a) uses encrypted file attachments, not plain text
email messages; (b)
be compeltely impossible to make a traffic sniffer worm-
like
that would allow to reconstruct your splited data a post it
somewhere
else.
Neverthless, there are no bullet proof solutions ;)
1,
Lopo
--- In openhealth@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Beller sbeller@
wrote:
Hello Lopo
pockets.
-- Bhaskar
On 05/06/2008 04:46 PM, Stephen Beller wrote:
Yes, I do realize patents are a problem for open source. We received
our software method patent in 1998 and have it in the US and two
other countries. Anyone interested can read about it at
http://cpsplit.typepad.com/
Anyway
help you
to choose your course of action.
Regards
-- Bhaskar
On 05/08/2008 11:22 AM, Stephen Beller wrote:
Our entire economic system can be characterized as pathological
mutation of
Capitalism, as I discuss at this link --
http://curinghealthcare.blogspot.com/2007/10/path-to-profound
so that everyone can benefit from it without
payment.
You did ask for our advice...
.Mark
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Stephen Beller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:sbeller%40nhds.com wrote:
Our entire economic system can be characterized as pathological mutation
of
Capitalism, as I discuss
Hello,
I'm new to this group and hope you can help me.
I've only recently heard about Open Health. As the inventor of a
disruptive/discontinuous health information technology, which includes
patented components, I'm looking for advice about open source licensing.
My primary motivation is my
, Adrian Midgley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Beller wrote:
I've only recently heard about Open Health. As the inventor of a
disruptive/discontinuous health information technology, which
includes
patented components, I'm looking for advice
17 matches
Mail list logo
