Re: [openib-general] two OFED uDAPL issues

2006-10-12 Thread Or Gerlitz
Arlin Davis wrote: > Or Gerlitz wrote: >> I see now that the uDAPL CMA provider code uses the MTU 1:1 as >> returned by the SM in the path, so if the env is made of the Mellanox >> PCI-X HCA there can be big BW drop, etc... we have discussed that. >> I wonder how are you overcoming this when run

Re: [openib-general] two OFED uDAPL issues

2006-10-11 Thread Arlin Davis
Or Gerlitz wrote: > Arlin, > > I see now that the uDAPL CMA provider code uses the MTU 1:1 as > returned by the SM in the path, so if the env is made of the Mellanox > PCI-X HCA there can be big BW drop, etc... we have discussed that. > > I wonder how are you overcoming this when running Intel M

[openib-general] two OFED uDAPL issues

2006-10-11 Thread Or Gerlitz
Arlin, I see now that the uDAPL CMA provider code uses the MTU 1:1 as returned by the SM in the path, so if the env is made of the Mellanox PCI-X HCA there can be big BW drop, etc... we have discussed that. I wonder how are you overcoming this when running Intel MPI w. OFED 1.0? I understand i