On 02/ 3/14 09:31 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
I can't find any mention of the subcommand image-update for pkg anywhere.
Not in the Oracle IPS docs, not in the man page on OI151a7.
Huh??
It was deprecated years ago in favor of the shorter and clearer "update"
subcommand.
-
x27;s been in the news this week is a proposal from Mozilla
that they don't even have a timeline for yet, not something that's already
implemented and rolled out in a release.
https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2014/02/13/more-details-on-directory-tiles/
--
-A
how much longer you need to support those.
Their support life runs out this year, and thus the flow of security
fixes stops coming (for those paying for support at least - without
support, you've got unpatched security holes either way).
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm
ks to both for the confirmation.
Coming from linux, I am used to just reboot for kernel updates.
Same here - only packages tagged reboot_needed cause this, so all those
updates have included changes to either the kernel or kernel drivers
that are tagged as such.
--
-Alan C
many eyes make all bugs shallow" only applies when:
a) many eyes are actually looking at the code, not just a few
b) the brains behind those eyes understand complex topics such
as deep crypto math, network protocols, etc.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- a
And searching with archie!
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindian
On 04/25/14 11:06 AM, Edgar Matzinger wrote:
You're correct. I don't get that SUN has put those files
in a non-standard location
It was the SVR4 standard once upon a time, but since no one uses any
other SVR4-based OS'es any more, all SVR4isms now seem like Sunisms.
-
ilers previously used don't support the required C++11 features.
(C++11 is in Solaris Studio 12.4 beta & the latest gcc versions, but those
aren't what previous Firefox releases had been built with.)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
p
http://who-t.blogspot.com/2009/04/zapping-server.html
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/375/how-to-enable-killing-xorg-with-ctrlaltbackspace
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineer
interfaces and applications
should now be using the more robust GTK+ based print interfaces.
Solaris 11 includes GNOME 2.30, which is 10 full releases past GNOME 2.10.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.o
On 09/23/14 08:05 AM, G B via openindiana-discuss wrote:
yet OI won't remove someone from a mailing list for irrational behavior?
Don't confuse neglect and lack of an active owner for someone consciously
deciding to continue the status quo. Is there anyone around who still
actively manages th
ight.
People found more bugs after the first patch went out. There are 6 CVE's for
bash announced in the last week after all.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almquist_shell
http://lwn.net/Articles/343924/
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
ions from 2.0 to 4.3, so that distros/packagers weren't
forced to update to the latest just to get the fixes.
There is nothing strange here, just don't expect to have the same
software versions in two OS's released 7 years apart.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coo
that release - i.e. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/ or
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/ to help see what release it was for.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http
On 10/14/14 09:47 PM, Nikola M. wrote:
On 10/13/14 07:05 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 10/13/14 08:30 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
You mentioned docs for solaris 11. How do I know when I'm looking at
solaris 11 and not something a bit older?
Solaris 11 docs have a new style with "Orac
de
source code, documentation, etc. for the OS under development open source and
redistributable - that ended after the Oracle acquisition with the return to the
closed source/non-redistributable model of Solaris 10.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
, but the only way to have the GUI with new upstream code would be
someone stepping up to take ownership of keeping the GUI up to date with
the private/uncommitted IPS internal interfaces it relies on.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle So
On 10/15/14 02:00 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 15/10/2014 21:05, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 10/15/14 12:00 PM, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:
On 15/10/2014 20:23, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi,
be warned that I just put the files that have been removed with the GUI
deprecation, I did not have
efox/addon/ssl-version-control/
EFF's HTTPS Everywhere addon was also updated yesterday to provide an
easy disable of SSL 3.0:
https://www.eff.org/files/Changelog.txt
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Sola
y_bit#lp64-abi-changes
lists some other differences between the 32-bit & 64-bit ABI's on
Solaris/illumos OS'es (though illumos won't see the ASLR or ADI
benefits, since those are post-closing additions to Solaris).
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@or
source to pic? Thank you in
advance for any and all replies.
https://gnu.org/software/groff/
Solaris never included pic in it's nroff packages.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/
n_SSH, which is a
fork of OpenSSH. OI should be using the version from the illumos gate.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss ma
On 11/28/14 06:25 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
If it’s C++, the name mangling is different; look up the options for the Sun
> and GNU versions of nm respectively, use each version of nm with its
> demangling option, and whichever has sensible output corresponds to the
> compiler used.
Even wi
On 12/ 7/14 02:50 PM, James Carlson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/7/2014 5:26 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
Wouldn't this break the binary compatibility guarantee that Solaris
had been traditionally marketed on?
I'm no kernel engineer, so I wouldn't know.
No. Th
.html#PKDEVglyus
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/ma
OI.
You'd be better off building the pulseaudio spec file from
https://hg.java.net/hg/solaris-desktop~spec-files
That's also where you'll find the 126 patches applied to Firefox to
produce the Solaris packages.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.co
On 01/21/15 12:34 PM, William Dowling wrote:
If you want solid info then try the illumos-developer mailing list.
Otherwise a few things you could try:
1: Read Oracles documentation on Device Drivers
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E29051/toc.html
There's also a companion Device Driv
On 02/ 1/15 11:19 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Another option would be to use Solaris 11 Express if it still exists anywhere -
it's old, but not as old as snv_65. I think it still had sun4u support, but I
could be mistaken.
I don't think it's still available, but yes, Solaris 11 Express 2010.11 (
On 02/ 2/15 04:02 PM, j...@m5.chicago.il.us wrote:
One of the members of this mailing list has recently written about
upgrading his Sparc computer from Solaris 11 to OpenBSD, because
(highly ironically), new versions of Solaris 11 do not support his
Sparc hardware.
I don't see the irony there -
On 02/ 3/15 10:15 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Now I would like to know how on Earth the Oracle people are compiling firefox
when basic
things do not work as they should?
Tons of local patches:
https://hg.java.net/hg/solaris-desktop~spec-files/file/e9ce74c46890/base
~spec-files/file/e9ce74c46890/patches
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http
On 02/ 7/15 06:57 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Don't let me put you off, but I'm just wondering what problem it solves?
It makes sure you can never accidentally load a binary plugin, even if a user
stashed an old copy of Flash in their home directory, since they're only
produced for 32-bit Firefox,
ot just the path to find them? That's what I usually see in pkg-config output.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mai
, to the common long term support
vs. rapid release model option found in many OS distros.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss
s releases. When you
upgrade to a new Xorg release you must update all modules as well. This happens
automatically for modules provided with the OS, but not for add-ons like
VirtualBox - if you use it's modules, you must install a new version of them
to get support for the new Xorg ABI.
--
On 4/27/2015 11:26 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
I seem to remember somebody talking about somewhere on the web where
Oracle/Sun leaves patches for Firefox.
But I can't find it. Was I dreaming or does that place exist?
They are part of the Solaris Desktop source repository:
https://java.net/pro
7;s applied,
since the version numbers in the patch names are often meaningless, since
the patches didn't get renamed when carried forward to new versions.
You might find it easier to browse the version at:
https://hg.java.net/hg/solaris-desktop~spec-files
or you can hg clone it to look
learn about spec files, mercurial and how to find my way around the
Solaris desktop source code..
Can you suggest where to go for tutorials and docs?
Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5
Den 28 apr 2015 08:54 skrev "Alan Coopersmith" mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>>:
On 04/2
hg repo or not.
-alan-
On 04/28/15 07:58 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
Is the desktop dying, then?
Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5
Den 28 apr 2015 16:52 skrev "Alan Coopersmith" mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>>:
There's still some info on
https://java
On 04/28/15 08:44 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
So the desktop will stay alive until sunrays are finally eol-ed?
Are you asking about OpenIndiana or Oracle Solaris?
At this time we have no plans to EOL the Oracle Solaris desktop - it's
what our developers still use, as well as some of our custo
/javase/8-compatibility-guide-2156366.html#A999476
search down for "Removal of 32-bit Solaris" where it says:
"The 64-bit binaries do not contain deployment tools such as Java Web Start
and Java Plug-in, therefore desktop integration is no longer required."
On 08/23/15 06:43 PM, j...@m5.chicago.il.us wrote:
I am running Solaris 11.2 on one of my computers, the latest version
of Solaris available for download from Oracle (at least, as of a month
ago, when I downloaded and installed it).
That's the latest stable release available, though 11.3 beta w
On 09/ 8/15 09:30 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
Where can I find sources for NetBeans,
https://netbeans.org/
the compiler, and dbox?? debugger?
Sources for the Studio compilers and dbx debugger were never released.
-alan-
___
openindiana-di
On 09/14/15 07:24 PM, Ramesh Chari wrote:
Reg SFElibreofficeToday i was able to install SFElibreoffice successfully...
rvc@openindiana:~$ pkg info SFElibreoffice
But where is the executable installed ? i am unable to locate in /opt/ or
/usr/bin...
"pkg contents SFElibreoffice" should list a
their port (big thanks to Ken for bugging Alan Coopersmith long
enough and hard enough, and to Mr. Alan Coopersmith for being once again on our
side [after the same took already place with openXsun in summer 2010 ]).
Thanks - but while I supported the publication of the DRM/KMS sources, I didn&#
On 12/ 3/15 03:51 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Yesterday I checked the latest nVidia driver and it has support
for Xorg 1.20 and we still use Xorg 1.7
I wonder where they got their time machine from - X.Org just barely
released Xorg 1.18:
http://lists.x.org/archiv
On 12/ 3/15 09:07 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I wonder where they got their time machine from - X.Org just barely
released Xorg 1.18:
This is of course irrelevant to my problem but that's what they state
in their site:
Added support for X.Org xserver ABI 20 (xorg-server 1.18).
So this wa
On 12/ 6/15 12:59 PM, Private openbabel wrote:
Dear Bob,
I would like to see a foundation registered in the UK in early 2016 to receive
donations and sponsorship similar to Libre Office.This will help with some of
the development objectives outlined.
Will it? Are there going to be enough dona
On 12/12/15 07:03 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Both of these appear to be due to incorrectly configured mail clients. The
second may be a matter of (bad!) taste. The first, being uncommon, is more than
likely a problem with the client.
And as annoying as both may be, is it worse than making the list
Enterprise Linux 6
http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/communications/communications-messaging-server-ds-520401.pdf
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/communications/unified-communications/messaging-server/overview/index.html
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@
On 12/28/15 06:57 AM, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator wrote:
Hi all,
I have PC with "Intel Ethernet Connection (2) I219-V" onboard network card and
it is not recognized by OI (Hipster) installation...
When looking at this list: http://illumos.org/hcl/ it is true - no such card
the
On 01/ 7/16 01:11 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Hi,
If someone wants to give it a shot, this page needs love:
http://www.openindiana.org/documentation/faq/
because it is fairly outdated...
Most of the OpenSolaris consolidation links pointing to hub.opensolaris.org
can be replaced with links to
On 01/ 9/16 07:49 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Please reply with responses to the above and with further questions and
answers, if any.
Places you may find some answers include:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Solaris-DRM-KMS-2015
http://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2015/Program/
On 01/ 9/16 09:33 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 01/ 9/16 07:49 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Please reply with responses to the above and with further questions and
answers, if any.
Places you may find some answers include:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Solaris-DRM
On 01/22/16 01:23 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 32-bit support in OpenIndiana...:
On the other hand, to properly utilize the attractive feature of
transparently supporting both
32-bit and 64-bit systems via isaexec,
When there was a giant corporation funding de
On 01/31/16 07:13 AM, Jay F. Shachter wrote:
"Does Openindiana provide a SPARC release?" -- maybe you could direct
the interested reader to Solaris-like systems that do support SPARC.
To the best of my knowledge, the only open-source Solaris-like system
that supports SPARC is the ancient and unsu
On 02/ 7/16 05:09 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
- there are 24 components left for packaging in x-S12, some of them not present
in OI, I do not know if some of them are irrelevant:
./accessx
This is a motif client for configuring accessibility settings - the GNOME
preferences panel does a better
for them shared on the above site
where OI can see & use them) - but it's the ~30% that aren't that most
people complain about.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.or
ckage installs the tools that will assist you in the migration of IPFilter
configuration to PF.
Note: Manual intervention will be required to ensure PF rules implement the
desired network policy."
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Orac
On 05/13/16 09:32 AM, Nikola M wrote:
On 05/13/16 06:14 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/12/16 10:50 PM, Nikola M wrote:
I would also like to see an announcement about ipfilter deprication in S11 yet.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/systems/end-of-notices/eonsolaris11-392732.html
&quo
On 05/25/16 12:15 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hi.
It seems illumos/Solaris is the only OS which doesn't have msg_control and
msg_controllen in struct msghdr by default.
For Solaris 11.x & earlier, yes.
Is it because of some standard requirements or just historical artifact? Can we
somehow al
mail folders of people who get infected.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http
useful for debugging, but not auditing, as LD_PRELOAD is ignored
by setuid programs, and can be unset in the environment by anyone.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://bl
On 06/30/16 07:21 AM, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator wrote:
Hi all,
just learned that Oracle gives Studio 12.5 for free:
Download Options for Oracle Developer Studio
Current Release - Oracle Developer Studio 12.5
Provides perpetual no-cost license for production use
uld be to wrap the first chunk of that in
OsSigHandler inside an "if (signo == SIGQUIT)" block.)
Still, that backtrace looks like some invalid function pointer got put
into the list of callbacks for the wakeup routine - either directly or
by something else overwriting a crucial bi
%h] '
endif
endif
endif
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
On 09/ 1/16 08:50 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
...unless...
we can get OpenWindows back.
That would be highly unlikely.
-alan-
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindi
On 08/17/16 11:57 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Note that on Solarish OS'es, the backtrace will sometimes warn you about the
last linker lookup failure, even when it's not relevant - it could be the
driver looked for that symbol, didn't find it because your Xorg is an older
relea
On 09/13/16 03:38 PM, Lionel Cons wrote:
On 14 September 2016 at 00:34, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
On 08/17/16 11:57 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Note that on Solarish OS'es, the backtrace will sometimes warn you about
the
last linker lookup failure, even when it's not relevant - it co
On 09/22/16 01:02 AM, Carl Brewer wrote:
XKB: Failed to compile keymap
Keyboard initialization failed. This could be a missing or incorrect setup of
xkeyboard-config.
For this you need to have installed x11/keyboard/data-xkb & x11/keyboard/xkbcomp
- I didn't see either in your package list. If
.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo
On 11/ 3/16 08:24 AM, ken mays via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Although, GNOME 3.22.1 has descended upon us...
Yes, but 1 year behind is a much smaller problem than 5.5 years and
a major release behind. It shouldn't take us 5 years to update again
now.
--
-Alan Cooper
On 12/8/2016 10:07 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> On another hand, is there a particular benefit of patching older versions in
> userland as cve fixes come out, rather than taking the newest release
> (assumed to include all bugfixes known to authors)?
That is a very risky assumption to make - many pac
On 12/31/16 05:00 AM, russell wrote:
Hi Alex,
I tried a pkg image-update -v --be-name openindiana-hipster-NN this morning
which did actually complete okay with information about gnu/tar.
After booting from the new environment and then attempting a pkg update -be-name
openindiana-hipster-NN+1 I
On 01/18/17 11:52 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/sparc/oracle-sparc/sparc-roadmap-slide-2076743.pdf
Really? 2034 still seems so far away now...
http://www.oracle.com/us/support/library/lifetime-support-hardware
On 01/18/17 12:13 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Why "The End is near"? Sounds the SPARC platform will be continued
beyond 2020, right?
Obviously I do not care about SPARC machines... But I see no Solaris 12...
It seems that Solaris 11.4 will be the last release of Sola
On 01/18/17 12:33 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
Really? 2034 still seems so far away now...
http://www.oracle.com/us/support/library/lifetime-support-hardware-301321.pdf
(pg. 37)
Well I do not see anything about Solaris 12 on page 37.
The support life document doesn't say anything about
On 01/18/17 08:58 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Will they still sell data machine, fishwork storage?
Yes - those systems have their own roadmap, separate from the
SPARC & Solaris roadmap. (But we're really getting off-topic
here for the OpenIndiana mailing list.)
-alan-
___
On 01/19/17 12:38 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
From that roadmap, my understanding is there is no on-premise and standalone
Solaris and SPARC releases after 2017 and everything goes into cloud.
Then you're misunderstanding the roadmap, which shows both on-premise & cloud
releases going forward until at
On 01/25/17 11:15 AM, Tim Mooney wrote:
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The end is near, Udo Grabowski said...:
You need reliable sources:
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/23/oracle_layoffs_in_hardware_div/>
I haven't seen any posts to the list from Alan Coopersmith
On 03/ 6/17 08:13 AM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
So I guess there is still something weird with the GL libraries :)
There will always be something weird with the GL libraries due to historical
mistakes and lack of cross-vendor cooperation which led to requiring a
completely different libGL for diff
On 03/ 7/17 06:10 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss wrote:
apostolo@adalind>> ls -l /usr/X11/include/NVIDIA/GL/gl.h
/usr/X11/include/NVIDIA/GL/gl.h: No such file or directory
This can be solved by downloading the Linux NVIDIA driver which includes this
file
and glext.h, glx.h, and
On 04/ 9/17 02:08 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
As an aside, there are limitations. The conditions were always pretty
strict,
so that compatibility only applies to (a) Solaris itself, and (b) only those
interfaces explictly marked as being compatible.
Specifically those whose man pages have an attri
On 04/27/17 05:05 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
Guenther,
I don't know if it is just me, or the whole list, but I have received a couple
dozen copies of this email.
is anyone else seeing lots of duplicates?
I am too (and not just this mail, but others from the OI lists as well) - I was
starting to wo
f
desktop session startup. The man page lists the args to change which
key it steals.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing
On 05/25/17 02:10 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can quickly tell what bit my Hipster 2017.04 is?
"isainfo -kv" will tell you which kernel is running.
-alan-
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openi
On 05/25/17 02:13 PM, Will Brokenbourgh wrote:
On 05/25/17 14:10, Harry Putnam wrote:
How can quickly tell what bit my Hipster 2017.04 is?
Have you tried:
uname -a
The Solaris/openSolaris/illumos kernel doesn't change any of the values
in uname between 32 & 64-bit kernels, much to the confu
On 05/26/17 04:26 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Jonathan Adams writes:
Much better than the Linux "file 'which file'" (with back ticks) ...
sudo file `which file`
/usr/bin/file: ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, dynamically
linked, not stripped, no debugging information available
Er..
On 05/26/17 05:48 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Predrag Zečević - Technical Support Analyst
writes:
Sorry if you already know for this, I though it might be worth
sharing:
https://blogs.oracle.com/observatory/github-repos-with-software-for-solaris
Thanks for that link...
And thanks to Alan
On 05/26/17 11:34 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Alan Coopersmith writes:
For the one I work on (not OI, but "Big Red"), we've been making
this conversion across 5+ years now, and are >90% done in our
development trunk, though much less done in what's been released so
far.
On 05/31/17 09:19 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Aside from executables that reference timestamps (given that a signed
twos-complement will overflow after Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 2038 GMT), and for
programs that will never need to manipulate files larger than 2GiB-1 (unless
they use large file su
On 05/31/17 09:43 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
The alternative would be a large times analog of large file support; why that
wasn't done when 64-bit began, I don't understand. :-)
It was considered at Sun in the late 90's but discarded as going full LP64
already provided a solution without c
On 05/31/17 10:30 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
On May 31, 2017, at 13:01, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 05/31/17 09:43 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
The alternative would be a large times analog of large file support; why that
wasn't done when 64-bit began, I don't understand. :-
No.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman
On 09/ 5/17 12:59 AM, Predrag Zečević - Technical Support Analyst wrote:
Hi all,
I have strange problem on my /hipster installation (since I have moved
to Mate from Gnome).
There were no changes on hardware in mean time:
pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0605
On 09/ 4/17 02:11 PM, Nikola M wrote:
On 09/ 4/17 08:18 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
I would expect exactly that, to be able to run it on compatible but newer
hardware, and at least on Oracle hardware,
but yes, you are right - over time new hardware requires new support, drivers
etc.
There
On 09/29/17 06:55 AM, Predrag Zečević - Technical Support Analyst wrote:
Hi all,
I got today alert (actually blinking TimeSlider icon) that root FS is more than
70% in use (that is my setup).
Went to check what occupies so much space, and found:
$ pfexec du -sch /*
...
76G /proc
/proc i
On 10/23/17 12:13 PM, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
I did find that VNC has DirectVNC for working with the framebuffer (
http://drinkmilk.github.io/directvnc/) and am exploring it more now.
I would be surprised if code written for the Linux DirectFB API's worked with
the Solaris framebuffer devices,
f yet:
cp /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.vesa /etc/X11/xorg.conf
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindi
201 - 300 of 385 matches
Mail list logo
