On 4/26/12 10:53 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 08:30 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
On 4/26/12 5:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 26/04/12 12:17 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
That isn't what spamdyke is trying to accomplish here. This checks to
see if the sender is trying to
On 26/04/12 12:17 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
That isn't what spamdyke is trying to accomplish here. This checks to
see if the sender is trying to spoof the MTA. What spamdyke is trying to
do is to blacklist emails based upon the ip address embedded in the
sending domain name. For example:
If I get
On 4/26/12 5:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 26/04/12 12:17 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
That isn't what spamdyke is trying to accomplish here. This checks to
see if the sender is trying to spoof the MTA. What spamdyke is trying to
do is to blacklist emails based upon the ip address embedded in
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 33
Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2012
In reply to: Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com
Chris, I'm still unclear on how to do this. How could you write a
regular express to check to see if the connecting ip address is
buried
On 4/26/12 11:54 AM, låzaro wrote:
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 33
Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2012
In reply to: Gary Gendelg...@genashor.com
Chris, I'm still unclear on how to do this. How could you write a
regular express to check to see
name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 42
Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2012
In reply to: Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com
Postfix will make a reverse lookup and if the domain not found, it will
not allow get the mail.
This is a completely different check. In spamdyke
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 42
Date: Thu, Apr 26, 2012
In reply to: Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com
Also you can tell postfix who request to the remote server if that
sender is a valid user, if it not exist i the remote server, the mail
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com wrote:
This is a problematic thing to do as many servers do not support this
functionality. I gave that approach up years ago because it adds delays for
non-deterministic benefits.
Yeah, it was widely switched off after spammers
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 08:30 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
On 4/26/12 5:01 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 26/04/12 12:17 AM, Gary Gendel wrote:
That isn't what spamdyke is trying to accomplish here. This checks to
see if the sender is trying to spoof the MTA. What spamdyke is
trying to
do is
... postfix is the better today :D
I saw using Qmail long time ago, I like it, but is obsolete
Also, I have my compiled Qmail and configured just as personal email
museum
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 17
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012
In reply to: Christopher
On 24/04/12 09:08 PM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
Dovecot's take on Qmail (and other MTA's http://wiki.dovecot.org/MTA )
which states qmail is an obsolete and unmaintained server. Its POP3
part can be taken over by Dovecot. Qmail started off boasting about
speed and security in the mid-1990s, but has
museum
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 17
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012
In reply to: Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
On Monday, April 23, 2012 08:44 PM, låzaro wrote:
in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked
On 25/04/12 11:06 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
Chris,
I've replaced my qmail chain for SASL delivery with postfix. It took me
a few rounds to get all the bits I needed working, but I'm good with the
results.
The non-SASL chain will be a big nut to crack. There are a lot of useful
spam features in
On 4/25/12 11:38 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On 25/04/12 11:06 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
Chris,
I've replaced my qmail chain for SASL delivery with postfix. It took me
a few rounds to get all the bits I needed working, but I'm good with the
results.
The non-SASL chain will be a big nut to crack.
anyway... postfix is the better today :D
I saw using Qmail long time ago, I like it, but is obsolete
Also, I have my compiled Qmail and configured just as personal email
museum
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 17
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012
In reply
netad...@lex-sa.cu wrote:
anyway... postfix is the better today :D
I saw using Qmail long time ago, I like it, but is obsolete
Also, I have my compiled Qmail and configured just as personal email
museum
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 17
Date
, låzaro wrote:
anyway... postfix is the better today :D
I saw using Qmail long time ago, I like it, but is obsolete
Also, I have my compiled Qmail and configured just as personal email
museum
Thread name: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Mail number: 17
Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012
in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked
for example, smtp auth, SASL, TLS and soon. Also postfix is more
modular. You can use it with someSQL LDAP and all thats cute things.
If need some help with postfix, can mail me to the private, postfix is
my strong point.
I will take you up on that!
On 2012-04-23 17:22, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:44:13 -0400
From: l?zaronetad...@lex-sa.cu
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss
I will take you up on that!
done
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
On Monday, April 23, 2012 08:44 PM, låzaro wrote:
in Qmail, the security is patch-maked in postfix is by-design-maked
NO, that is not accurate. security where it means anti-spam, DJB did
not bother because as far as he is concerned, the way things are, things
are just broken. Too bad his
On 22/04/12 05:19 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
you could always use Sendmail ... It's reliable, and flexible, if you
can work out the configuration for it ... but Postfix is a damn sight
easier to get working.
people can still read sendmail rulesets? :p
My biggest bug bears with Postfix are
On 22/04/12 12:50 AM, Magnus Hedemark wrote:
If we're going out on limbs, Haraka might be worth a look.
http://haraka.github.com/
One still needs a proper mta on a later stage with haraka if used for
incoming...
Sounds more like a smtp proxy with filtering/authentication capabilities.
Which brings us back to qmail. I've been using it flawlessly starting
on a Sparc IPC running SunOS before Postfix was a gleam in Wietse
Venema's eye. The darn thing is rock solid, secure, lightweight, and
fast. That said, I have nothing against Postfix other that I've never
had a reason to
For the most part, they don't need to any more.
IMHO, during the Sendmail 8.8/8.9, or when ever the m4 macro compiler
and .mc files got brought online, that event brought Sendmail up to
speed on ease of configuration inline with its competitors.
Jerry
On 04/22/12 08:22, Christopher Chan
On 22/04/12 11:28 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
For the most part, they don't need to any more.
IMHO, during the Sendmail 8.8/8.9, or when ever the m4 macro compiler
and .mc files got brought online, that event brought Sendmail up to
speed on ease of configuration inline with its competitors.
But
So are people up for netqmail, daemontools, djbdns packages?
On Sunday, April 22, 2012 08:34 PM, Gary Gendel wrote:
Which brings us back to qmail. I've been using it flawlessly starting
on a Sparc IPC running SunOS before Postfix was a gleam in Wietse
Venema's eye. The darn thing is rock
What MTA would you suggest?
On 2012-04-20 14:40, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Message: 8 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:00:03 +0800 From: Christopher
Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk To:
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss]
Qmail-to-go
Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana? Message-ID:
4f90b513.9080...@bradbury.edu.hk Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi Hans, May I ask why you would want to
use
, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Message: 8 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:00:03 +0800 From: Christopher
Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?
Message-ID:4f90b513.9080
Chris,
There are no packages for Qmail that I am aware of. However, it's
pretty trivial to build and install since it's dependencies are
extremely small. I wrote some SMF scripts so I could use svcadm.
I have two chains for incoming email. The first is on the standard port
25 and has no
Webmin comes with a qmail modules in its standard bundle. AFAIK,
Sunfreeware might be the only place to get a qmail package. Since it's
no longer in development, I'd highly recommend checking out some 3rd
party patches and forks if you intend to continue down this path;
32 matches
Mail list logo
