Seeing as I wrote the code, I wish I could remember why it is that way, but
I unfortunately can't. My initial instinct is that this was unintentional,
but I can't discount the possibility that a reason exists.
I probably have much earlier versions of the code lying around, so I could
research it i
Yes
-- Jonathan
On Sat, 15 May 2021, 3:23 am Kevin Rushforth,
wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jeanette Winzenburg [1] to OpenJFX Reviewer.
>
> Jeanette is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 33 commits
> [2][3] to OpenJFX. Jeanette consistently participates in code reviews of
> various
ink Frederic meant that the Optional is empty in the case where you
> can't reliably get the state of the key, otherwise the true and false
> values are for the on and off states. The Optional itself is never null.
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 7:31 PM Jonathan Giles
> wrote:
>
>
t the equivalent AWT method
> > uses. FWIW, I don't generally like checked exceptions; we don't define
> > any such exceptions in JavaFX and I wouldn't want to start now.
> >
> > -- Kevin
> >
> >
> > On 1/16/2021 12:46 AM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
Hi friends,
Just to throw out an alternate API approach (which I would not go anywhere
near close to saying is a better approach), we could consider a three-value
enum getter API:
public static KeyLockState Platform::getKeyLockState(KeyCode keyCode);
Where KeyLockState = { LOCKED, NOT_LOCKED, NO
Vote: YES
-- Jonathan
(Tapped on a touch device)
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, 1:53 am Kevin Rushforth,
wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jeanette Winzenburg [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
>
> Jeanette is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 16
> changesets [2][3] to OpenJFX.
>
> Votes are due by June 15
Vote: YES
-- Jonathan
(Tapped on a touch device)
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, 1:53 am Kevin Rushforth,
wrote:
> I hereby nominate Jose Pereda [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
>
> Jose is an OpenJFX community member, who has contributed 16 changesets
> [2][3] to OpenJFX.
>
> Votes are due by June 15, 2020.
>
>
It's been a wee while since I built TableView, but from memory there is
code in there that virtualises the columns, such that those that are
scrolled out of view are not being included in the scenegraph needlessly.
>From memory, to achieve this all you needed to do was set a fixed row
height on the
ntry in tables. This means: enter commits value and moves focus to
> another (not necessarily the next) cell. AFAIK one of the requirements is
> the TableView & CellEditor patch that Jonathan Giles discussed while he was
> still working at Oracle. I was wondering if that was ever impleme
Vote: yes
-- Jonathan
(Tapped on a touch device)
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, 10:57 PM Arunprasad Rajkumar, <
arunprasad.rajku...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Vote: Yes
>
> > On 11-Jul-2018, at 5:11 AM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
> >
> > I hereby nominate Prem Balakrishnan [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
> >
> > Prem
Yup,
A great regret. I wish it were supported, but it isn't due to historical
legacy. There are some small ways you can make some progress, e.g. add
focus listeners on the editor node, but they are half solutions at best.
-- Jonathan
(Tapped on a touch device)
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, 10:25 AM , wr
Congrats to Kevin and team on this milestone!
-- Jonathan
(Tapped on a touch device)
On Mon, 7 May 2018, 4:01 PM Kevin Rushforth,
wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the first Early Access build of a standalone
> JavaFX SDK [1]. You can download it and run it using OpenJDK 10 or an
> OpenJDK 11 E
Ankit,
You should zoom out a little bit and look at the bigger picture. Does
OpenJFX want more or less contributors? Does OpenJFX want to make the
burden to becoming a committer easier or more difficult? Does OpenJFX want
to be a community that welcomes or shuns people who are ready to contribute?
requirements too great should be
encouraged to involve themselves in projects such as JFXtras, etc.
-- Jonathan
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> Many years ago I had a discussion with Jonathan Giles about if the things
> that were being made in JFXtras would eventually
Vote: yes
-- Jonathan
On 12/12/17, 1:25 PM, "openjfx-dev on behalf of Kevin Rushforth"
wrote:
I hereby nominate Laurent Bourgès [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
Laurent is the author of the Marlin rasterizer, which is used as the
default rasterizer for both Java2D and JavaFX. He h
Vote: yes
--
Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity.
On November 1, 2017 9:18:16 AM GMT+13:00, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
>I hereby nominate Ambarish Rapte [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
>
>Ambarish is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle, who has contributed 10
>changesets [2][3] to OpenJFX.
Vote: YES
On September 28, 2017 2:10:09 PM GMT+13:00, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
>I hereby nominate Prasanta Sadhukhan [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
>
>Prasanta is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle, who has contributed 12
>changesets [2] to OpenJFX.
>
>Votes are due by October 11, 2017.
>
>Only current
All,
WebGL is something that is currently in the planning pipeline with a
relatively high priority. This means it is not under active development
yet, but we already have engineers working on the research towards this
feature. Once this is concluded and the scope of the work better
understood
I can appreciate your desire to have more access to skin internals. As I
was going through JEP 253 to make these APIs public I tried to be as
clear as possible - at conferences, on openjfx-dev, via Twitter, etc -
that developers urgently need to tell me what they want, as I couldn't
just do a b
Jon, Kevin and / or Phil,
Please review the webrev below. It improves the JavaFX javadocs such
that there are (hopefully) no bad links any longer.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185767
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8185767/
Thanks,
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin, Phil,
Could you please review the webrev below, which aims to provide new
public API for focus traversal in JavaFX.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091673
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8091673.1
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin, Phil,
Could you please review the webrev below, which aims to remove the
unused two-level focus code that presently ships in JDK 9 and earlier
releases.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178519
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8178519/
Thanks,
--
-- Jonathan
This is correct. The intent is to offer this performance improvement as part of
jdk 10, and not in earlier releases such as those you mention.
--
Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity.
On July 14, 2017 6:55:06 PM GMT+12:00, Sverre Moe wrote:
>This bug has Fix Version to 10. Does t
Kevin,
Could you please review the javadoc fix here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181169
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8181169/index.html
Thanks
--
-- Jonathan
Vote: yes
On May 26, 2017 2:20:28 AM HST, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
>I hereby nominate Ajit Ghaisas [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
>
>Ajit is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle, who has contributed 10
>changesets to OpenJFX. A list of these changesets is available by the
>following link:
>
>http://hg.o
Hi all,
In the next week I have two topics to discuss, both with similar names
but related to quite different functionality. The topic for today is
adding the necessary API to the JavaFX UI control Cell class to enable
support for 'commit on focus loss', that is, the ability to
automatically
Thorsten,
Your reference to JDK-8077916 is correct here. Our first goal was to
simply get the skins into the public API in a minimal form. In some
cases there was then follow-up feedback from the community regarding
missing API, and there were improvements made. Your feedback here is the
same
etainAll doc comment... :(
...jim
On 1/29/17 1:31 PM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
Ajit,
Could you please review the following jira issue and webrev:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173385
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8173385/
Thanks
Ajit,
Could you please review the following jira issue and webrev:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173385
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8173385/
Thanks
--
-- Jonathan
Vote: yes
On 26/01/17 8:39 AM, David Hill wrote:
I hereby nominate Semyon Sadetsky to OpenJFX Committer.
Semyon Sadetsky is part of the JavaFX team focusing on glass.
A list of Semyon's commits and reviews is available by the following
links
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/rt/log?
{
if( ! cssSensitive ) {
return;
}
}
I do understand that I'm too late in JDK9 cycle to add such an API but
one could at least dream about such a thing.
Tom
On 24.01.17 00:15, Jonathan Giles wrote:
There are two different topics here, both of which are near and dear to
my heart (and als
There are two different topics here, both of which are near and dear to
my heart (and also make me feel like I've been doing JavaFX for way too
long!).
The specific case of TabPane doing CSS / layout on the content of all
tabs is something captured here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/
This sounds like a reasonable issue to discuss a resolution for. Can you
please file a Jira issue and we can look into our options (either making
a reapplyCss() method available, or following something along the lines
of your suggestion)?
Also, thanks for taking the time to test JDK 9 - this i
As far as I can recall there are no bug reports on this issue. Please do
file them so that TreeTableView can be improved. Thanks.
-- Jonathan
On 13/01/17 10:00 PM, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
Hi,
we recently came across some limitations (you might call them bugs) in the tree
table implementation.
Platform.firePulse() never existed, you're probably thinking of
Toolkit.firePulse() (which is not public API)?
A close replacement is Platform.requestNextPulse().
-- Jonathan
On 17/01/17 10:00 AM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
One of the methods I use a lot in Tests, to make sure something has
happened
Ajit, Ambarish,
Please can you review the webrev and discussion at the following links:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140504
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8140504/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin,
Could you please review the documentation cleanups done here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171926
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8171926/
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
Kevin,
Please review the webrev for adding module-level javadoc comments to all
JavaFX modules defined in JDK 9:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171983
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8171983/index.html
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
Thanks for sending in this patch - I have attached it to the jira issue
on your behalf.
-- Jonathan
On 9/12/16 8:44 AM, Itai wrote:
It seems to me the source of the problem is line 466 in
com.sun.javafx.util.Utils:
//TODO - testing for an instance of Stage seems wrong but works
fo
as possible.
On 8-12-2016 00:45, Jonathan Giles wrote:
Hi folks,
Development on JDK 9 is slowly starting to ramp down, and we are
starting to turn our attention to the goals for JavaFX in JDK 10 and
beyond. We are starting to compile our list of what we think is
important, but we really want t
Hi folks,
Development on JDK 9 is slowly starting to ramp down, and we are
starting to turn our attention to the goals for JavaFX in JDK 10 and
beyond. We are starting to compile our list of what we think is
important, but we really want to hear from the community about what
their highest pri
Vadim,
Please review the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169642
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8169642/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin,
Could you please review the following webrev. This is a docs-only change.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168258
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8168258
Thanks.
--
-- Jonathan
Vadim,
Could you please review the webrev for the mentioned issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165624
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8165624/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Vadim,
Please review the following webrev:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167138
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8167138/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Vadim,
Please review the following webrev:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167137
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8167137/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Vadim,
Please review the following webrev:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167134
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8167134/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Vadim,
Please review the following webrev:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167132
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8167132/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Vadim,
Please review the webrev for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167055
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8167055/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin, Chien,
Please can you review the webrev for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166950
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8166950
Thanks
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin and / or Vadim,
Please review the fix for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166025
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8166025.3/
Thanks!
-- Jonathan
Kevin and / or Vadim,
Please review the fix for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166021
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8166021/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Kevin and / or Vadim,
Please review the fix for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166013
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgiles/8166013.1/
Thanks!
--
-- Jonathan
Without a small snippet of code that reproduces the problem, not really.
If you can create a self-contained test that demonstrates the problem, I
can take a look at it.
-- Jonathan
On 1/09/16 7:08 AM, Tai Hu wrote:
I am using JavaFX XYChart to plot some big data set (1+ points). If both X
Vote: yes
-- Jonathan
On 24 July 2016 02:42:39 GMT+12:00, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
>I hereby nominate Andrey Rusakov [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
>
>Andrey is a member of JavaFX SQE team at Oracle working on test
>development, who has contributed 19 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least
>
>8 of which
vote: YES
-- Jonathan
On 20/07/16 1:37 AM, David Hill wrote:
I hereby nominate Ankit Srivastava to OpenJFX Committer.
Ankit Srivastava is part of the JavaFX team focusing on Web.
A list of Ankit's commits and reviews is available by the following links
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-
ote:
Great! In that case forget the patch I made, it doesn’t make sense
until the treeVisible property is implemented. Is there any jira
ticket that I could follow?
Thank you Jonathan.
From: Jonathan Giles [mailto:jonathan.gi...@oracle.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 8. März 2016 10:01
To:
I think this is a reasonable expectation. Can you please file an issue
and we can progress it from there?
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
On 23/06/16 7:31 AM, Tom Schindl wrote:
Hi,
Take a look at the stack below.
ComboBoxListViewSkin(ComboBoxBaseSkin).(ComboBoxBase,
ComboBoxBaseBehavior) line: 57
Hi all,
Please review my addition of 'commitValue' / 'cancelEdit' APIs to
Spinner and ComboBox. These APIs mirror the API on TextInputControl, and
allows for the controls (rather than their skins) to properly commit on
focus loss.
Previously committing on focus loss was handled by the contro
rowse/JDK-8159121
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
On 8/06/16 9:47 AM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
Hi all,
One thing I've been looking into recently is the issue of what the
Enter key should do when it is pushed with regards to buttons in a UI
where one of those buttons is a 'default' button.
wrote:
What about forgetting the whole notion of a "default button" and the
only effect of setting the default property to true being that the
button will start as focused?
So I add a question:
3) Would anyone miss the "default button"?
Tomas
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 a
Hi all,
One thing I've been looking into recently is the issue of what the Enter
key should do when it is pushed with regards to buttons in a UI where
one of those buttons is a 'default' button. There are number of Jira
issues on this topic, and I wanted to poll the community to understand
it
Andrey,
Both issues you've posted about here I have previously +1'd in the jira
issue. If the webrev changes or needs more review from me, please just
continue the discussion in there and clarify what is needed.
-- Jonathan
On 2/06/16 4:23 AM, Andrey Rusakov wrote:
Please look at my regressi
I'm not involved in WebKit work at all (so I'm no authority on this), but it
sounds like what you're asking is already answered in Kevin's email that you
quoted.
-- Jonathan
Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity.
On 31 May 2016 07:52:25 GMT+12:00, Matthieu BROUILLARD
wrote:
>Sorr
Unfortunately openjfx-dev stripped the attachment, so please send that
directly to me.
Are you certain that the linked changeset is the only change necessary
to resolve the issue? A lot of code has changed in the selection models,
and whilst the linked changeset is small enough that it can be
Vote: YES
-- Jonathan
On 1/04/16 10:04 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
I hereby nominate Murali Billa [1] to OpenJFX Committer.
Murali is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has
contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are
significant.
Votes are due by
There are known issues regarding ProgressIndicator and unintended CPU
usage. These will be fixed in JDK 9, but the work is pending new API in
the scenegraph related to knowing exactly whether a Node is actually
'tree visible' or not.
-- Jonathan
On 29/03/16 8:53 AM, Tai Hu wrote:
I finally p
Jeanette,
There are no plans to make this into public API for the initial release
of JDK 9. Depending on time availability and priorities, it is possible
it may make its way into an update release, pending community review and
some degree of consensus.
-- Jonathan
On 18/03/16 10:45 PM, fast
>agree and I would like to add that having in the public API would be
>even better :-).
>
>Thank you,
>Diego
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jonathan Giles [mailto:jonathan.gi...@oracle.com]
>Sent: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2016 22:54
>To: Cirujano Cuesta, Diego; openj
If you can, are you able to file bug reports for these?
-- Jonathan
On 29/02/16 10:49 AM, Cirujano Cuesta, Diego wrote:
Hi all,
We found two important bugs in ProgressIndicator that are related with the
following tickets:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8094829
https://bugs.openjdk.
Yes, it is something that Leif is exploring for JDK 9. It is not a hard
commitment, but is something we are trying to get into JDK 9. See here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091673
-- Jonathan
On 17/02/16 11:10 AM, Hervé Girod wrote:
Hello, I'm sure this has already been answered
Check out my blog post here:
http://fxexperience.com/2016/01/node-picking-in-javafx/
It might be useful
-- Jonathan
On 3/02/16 10:36 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
Do we have such an API yet?
I found this:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091684
and:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/brows
7;t mind keeping the
overhead low until we have logical chunks of work either.
-- Jonathan
On 2/02/16 5:58 AM, faste...@swingempire.de wrote:
Zitat von Jonathan Giles :
In moving most of the skin code to public API (as part of JEP 253), I
worked with the plan of minimising the API as much as possi
In moving most of the skin code to public API (as part of JEP 253), I
worked with the plan of minimising the API as much as possible, and
would then spend time this year bringing API back out in a more
considered way (as opposed to dumping all skin code, warts and all, into
public API and makin
g? Unfortunately I can't find a
page with TableView / TreeTableView UX specification any more, but
this behaviour is not specified there.
It causes a problem in the application I'm working on, where the
selection has a business meaning.
Regards,
Konstantin
2016-01
Hi all,
I've been aware for a very long time that many people would love to see
the default behavior for the ListView / TreeView / TableView /
TreeTableView controls change from being 'cancel edit on focus lost' to
'commit edit on focus lost' when users are editing the value of a cell.
I bel
Kevin,
Please review the latest patch attached here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090477
Thanks
--
-- Jonathan
I can't look into this in depth immediately, but I do recall working on
this some months back, and I'm fairly sure I resolved it for JDK 9. I
just quickly run the test application attached to JBS-8147483 and can
not see the cells being recreated (after the initial creation).
I will follow this
Vote: YES
-- Jonathan
On 22/12/15 8:45 AM, David Hill wrote:
I hereby nominate Johan Vos to OpenJFX Committer.
Johan Vos (jvos) has been active in the OpenJFX community, and
instrumental in the maturity of Monocle, the owner of the Android and
IOS ports and is an OpenJFX Author.
A list of
ote:
As i see it the url is optional so wouldn't make sense to return Optional
to make this more explicit?
Tom
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 10.12.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Jonathan Giles :
Hi Chien, Kevin,
Please can you review the following JBS issue (and attached patch):
https://bugs.o
Hi Chien, Kevin,
Please can you review the following JBS issue (and attached patch):
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145143
As the subject line states, this issue proposes to promote the
Image.impl_getUrl() method to Image.getUrl(), so that it is public API.
--
-- Jonathan
Hi Kevin, all,
Please review the patch attached to the following JBS issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144625
This change removes the impl_getCode() and impl_getChar() methods from
KeyCode, and adds in getCode() and getChar() methods.
--
-- Jonathan
Hi Kevin, all,
Please review the patch attached to the following JBS issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144962
This API removes the deprecated TableColumnBase.impl_reorderable
property, and replaces it with a TableColumnBase.reorderable property.
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
Hi Kevin, all,
Please review the most recent patch attached to the following JBS issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144628
This API removes the Window.impl_getWindows() method that returned an
Iterator, and replaces it with Window.getWindows(), which
returns an unmodifiable Obse
I've not tested myself, but this might help:
http://gluonhq.com/gluon-supports-javafx-embedded-binary-builds-now-available/
-- Jonathan
Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity.
On 6 December 2015 15:29:27 GMT+13:00, Scott Palmer wrote:
>I seem to recall that the Arm builds of Java 8
Hi all.
As you may recall a few months back I kicked off a review of APIs that
exist in com.sun.* packages that were going to be lost due to the
arrival of JDK 9. This resulted in a small number of APIs being proposed
and made public in the last few weeks. With JDK 9 slipping we think it
is p
I have filed and attached the issue here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144088
@Kevin - would you mind giving this a quick API review please?
-- Jonathan
On 26/11/15 10:00 AM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
I found the Jira issue I was looking forunfortunately it lacks a
lot of detail
e the same issue in this proposed change.
-- Jonathan
On 26/11/15 6:46 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
You should be able to add generics compatibly, you just can't change the
generics signature. One shot to get it right IIRC.
On Nov 25, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
It was an oversi
n 26/11/15 6:46 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
You should be able to add generics compatibly, you just can't change the
generics signature. One shot to get it right IIRC.
On Nov 25, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
It was an oversight at the time, and (from memory) is now a breaking chang
It was an oversight at the time, and (from memory) is now a breaking change to
fix it, so for now it remains as it is, sadly.
-- Jonathan
Sent from a touch device. Please excuse my brevity.
On 26 November 2015 03:33:04 GMT+13:00, Lawrence Parker
wrote:
>Seems like getTableRow() should return T
Given I've been name checked I'll respond :-)
I believe the JavaFX Community site was automated - it basically
aggregated a number of blogs regardless of the individual blog posts
relevance. The challenge was the upfront discovery of relevant websites
and adding them to the aggregator. I am a
I don't believe there is any inconsistency here. We are preserving the
existing semantics in PlatformImpl.startup to not prevent duplicate
calls by default, whilst we are reversing the semantics for the public
API in Platform, where we do prevent duplicate calls. The end result is
that we have
Hi all,
Please review the new API proposal for a pulse listener API on Scene at
the URL below. The proposed patch file is attached to the jira issue.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8097917
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
Hi all,
Please review the new API proposal for the ability to enter and exit
nested event loops at the URL below. The proposed patch file is attached
to the jira issue.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090865
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
If there are any that I've missed or that you think are higher priority,
leave a comment in the jira issue or email me the issue IDs.
-- Jonathan
On 18/11/15 1:55 AM, faste...@swingempire.de wrote:
Jonathan,
thanks for the clarification, I indeed misunderstood the new tag.
On the other hand
Kevin, Leif,
Could you please review the patch attached here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143033
Whilst the patch itself is tiny, a sanity check that what I'm doing
would be much appreciated. Refer to my comment in Jira for more context.
Thanks,
-- Jonathan
Have been reporting variants (and ranting and suggesting fixes) for
ages ... and now seeing that some of those reports got tagged
"nicetohave" ... dhhh
Jeanette,
You are misinterpreting the 'nicetohave' label as a negative. The actual
fact is that the 'nicetohave' label is applied to i
Neither of these classes are currently planned to be moved into public
API for JDK 9. You should file separate requests in bug tracker so we
can discuss the feasibility of both of these classes.
-- Jonathan
On 6/11/15 11:48 PM, Rahman USTA wrote:
Hi all;
I'm trying Jigsaw build with my JavaF
I have organised a lunch as per usual. Email me off-list for the details.
-- Jonathan
On 25/10/2015 8:06 p.m., Mario Torre wrote:
Hi all,
Is there going to be a lunch/dinner/breakfast/beer/something like last
year at JavaOne? I didn't see any email on the mailing list (but I've
been a bit off
FYI - this is now backported and will be in 8u72.
-- Jonathan
On 24/09/2015 8:37 p.m., Werner Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
since there seems to be an opportunity to have fixes backported to 8,
I'd like to ask for a backport of the fix for
[JDK-8131151] Pressing ESC in a nested alert closes self and p
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
