Hey everybody!
These all sound like really good points. I agree with Pedro that the ability to
auto-reload (especially during development) is a really great thing, but I
agree with the blog post and Clemens that in production this can be problematic
depending on the location of the source CSS
Hi Steve,
It could be a benchmark problem, although I wouldn’t be surprised at all if the
benchmark was exercising the platform in some way that was CPU limited.
Assuming it is CPU limited (and not going multi-core), I think the problem
really comes down to what Markus said:
> The limiting
Hi Herve,
Thanks for chiming in. I agree. From my own experience and benchmarking with
other app-dev GUI toolkits, JavaFX performs very well for a very wide range of
use cases. That being said, performance was always a passion of mine and I know
there is more to be had. I like Kevin’s idea of
Have you guys profiled the application to see where the CPU time is spent? How
many nodes in the app?
In the past the majority of CPU time has been spent in one or more of the
following (not sure if it still applies):
- Computing changed bounds (a lot of work was done to speed this up, but I
Hi,
As you know, I’ve been on the periphery of this project for the last several
years, my full time employment taking me into a different path from client
toolkits. The time has come to pass the torch, and part of that is to send my
official resignation so that another may take it up. Truly,
>>> 2) Do we want to have different behaviors for OS X and non-OS X? I'm a
>>> newly inducted member into the cult of Mac, and I don't yet have all
>>> my bearings sorted out, so I don't have a strong opinion here.
>> Please don't make different OSes behave differently as this is a real pain.
>>
Vote: YES
> On Dec 22, 2015, at 6:10 PM, Jasper Potts wrote:
>
> Vote: yes
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Alexander Kouznetsov
>> wrote:
>>
>> Vote: yes
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander Kouznetsov
>>
You should be able to add generics compatibly, you just can't change the
generics signature. One shot to get it right IIRC.
> On Nov 25, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Jonathan Giles wrote:
>
> It was an oversight at the time, and (from memory) is now a breaking change
> to fix
Is it consistent among all android devices, or is it a specific device?
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 12:30 PM, Johan Vos wrote:
>
> Thanks Jim.
> I tried with different optimization flags, but it doesn't make a big
> difference. Tracing it down to system calls, somehow the gl
Donald, do you know if the iOS version has the JIT compiler? I know Apple
reduced the restriction for some cases, but I can’t remember if it applied to
us or not. Or is the VM on iOS interpreter only?
Richard
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Donald Smith wrote:
>
>
Hi everybody,
Moving to JBS is both good and bad. The good:
Reduce costs associated with the project
Reduce internal overhead for development processes (everybody on Java uses JBS
for everything so having a second JIRA makes everything harder with release
management, management, even engineers
Why can't an effort be made to influence JBS policies before making the
switch?
I think the way to do this is to engage the JBS folks on their alias, I don’t
think they watch this one and Kevin doesn’t have the ability to change this
policy. He’s just the messenger!
Richard
tl;dr; I lean toward keeping the Control API as view-agnostic as possible, but
where view details become essential to the operation of the control, then
define the Control to always include those specific view details.
Sounds like this may be a case of where view details become essential to the
operation of the control, then define the Control to always include those
specific view details.”
On Mar 23, 2015, at 11:45 AM, Robert Krüger krue...@lesspain.de wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Richard
Cool!
On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mani Sarkar sadhak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
As per Chris's message and the tweet I got last night / this morning I'm
updating you (which I was intending to do when the time was right), that we
now have a successful OpenJFX build on Cloudbees, see
Hi Chris,
I’ve not seen any experiments or investigation along these lines, looking
forward to what you find!
Richard
On Nov 3, 2014, at 3:42 PM, Chris Newland cnewl...@chrisnewland.com wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the JITWatch[1] project I've written a tool called JarScan
which counts
I tried writing one once just using a TextField, but it ended up being very
difficult. With the TextFlow as a basis instead, it might be easier. You can
also do it out of a composite of controls as you mention here, depending on the
user experience you are looking for with the control. I would
I’ll let one of the other guys answer about the web component build order, but
...
On Sep 1, 2014, at 11:58 PM, Niklas Therning nik...@therning.org wrote:
Also, how is the jfxrt.jar that comes with my Java8 installation treated by
the build? I guess it is ignored since otherwise I wouldn't
I won't be able to get access to a Windows machine for another week or so but
when I do I will gladly send you some screenshots. However, are you saying
that this is the first time anyone has reported such a finding? There's no
existing JIRA for this specific issue? I ask because even
The work for planning is now done within OpenJDK. You might want to look at
some of the JEPs defined for FX in upcoming releases (such as
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/209, http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/205,
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/204, etc).
Thanks
Richard
On Aug 11, 2014, at 2:08 PM,
autosize() on Node may be what you want (sizes it then afterward you can read
values)?
On Aug 4, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
I'd like to find the calculated height of a node in my window controllers
initialise() method, so I can shrink the height to zero and then
This sounds like there are concrete plans for this, which wood be
great news.
I’d say there were a lot of thoughts around it but it hasn’t been turned into
an actionable plan. Heck, I don’t even know if we have a JIRA for it (Kevin
would know…)
Richard
The approach where an integration API
I was interested in Angle for exactly this same reason — it would allow us to
expose OpenGL at the public API level. However there are licensing issues we’d
have to look at, performance tests to be run, security audits performed, and
whether or not it is actually able to perform well.
Hmmm… FX Experience is running for me. Is anybody else having this problem?
Richard
On Jul 8, 2014, at 2:51 PM, ngalarn...@abinitio.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
My understanding of Swing was that when in a modal dialog, which blocked
the EDT, a second EDT was fired up for the duration of the
My guess would be that the number of resize events is swamping the event queue.
On Jun 2, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Guillaume Anctil drakk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have encountered severe lag in my application when resizing the stage
while an animation is running.
I've made this very simple
It would be nice if Oracle or somebody else produced some documentation on
this. You could create a feature request in Jira
(https://javafx-jira.kenai.com) for such documentation or email the
documentation team (javasedocs...@oracle.com), or write a blog or a openjfx
wiki article
My question to the list is: How do you guys produce 32 bit libjfxwebkit.so
with debugging symbols? Have you been able to? Do you have any special tricks
in your sleeves?
Oh man, you’re in unchartered waters. Building webkit is a royal pain in the
neck :-(. You’ve already ventured farther
Vote: YES
On May 14, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
I hereby nominate Sandra Lions-Piron to be an OpenJFX Committer.
Sandra Lions-Piron is a significant contributor of the JavaFX Scene Builder
2.0 product, and is the designated owner of the
Vote: YES
On May 14, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
I hereby nominate Mo Chicharro to be an OpenJFX Committer.
Mo Chicharro is a significant contributor of the JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0
product, and, as the visual and interaction designer, he is
Vote: YES
On May 14, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
I hereby nominate Eric Le Ponner to be an OpenJFX Committer.
Eric Le Ponner is a significant contributor of the JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0
product, and is the architect of the SB Kit API as well
Vote: YES
On May 14, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
I hereby nominate Yves Joan to be an OpenJFX Committer.
Yves Joan is a significant contributor of the JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0
product, and is the designated owner of the Library Panel,
Vote: YES
On May 14, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
I hereby nominate Jerome Cambon to be an OpenJFX Committer.
Jerome Cambon is a significant contributor of the JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0
product, and is the designated owner of the Inspector
Hi,
Actually I don’t know of any reason why Window and Scene cannot be created and
initialized on any thread. Each of these has a peer, and the *peer* we can’t
update except on the right thread (or with care, these are OS specific
restrictions or issues). But I don’t see any reason why the
I do not know if JavaFX was ever designed to allow such an approach.
The intent was that you wouldn't have to, but that the system would do it for
you. That is, we (in theory) would break a scene graph down and process it with
multiple threads, both for bounding volume computations as well as
When you get your game finished, let us know :-).
On Apr 6, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Exo Verse tora...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows makes its own separate stack space for each OpenGL context
integration. Which is why it runs so smoothly on Windows7. Win7 already
separates each running process as
Yes, this is one of the few things that I just hate about IDEA.
On Apr 7, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com wrote:
I can't speak to other IntelliJ issues, but the root cause of this particular
one is the same thing that Debbie ran into last week -- IntelliJ doesn't
You might also want to try using the PulseLogger (which was recently refactored
to be usable from Java Flight Recorder). See
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/file/978e5c042214/modules/base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/logging/PrintLogger.java.
Basically a few system properties are
Turns out it was a stupid mistake on my part causing the last few linking
errors, I hadn't added one of the C files I needed to the makefile (well I
had, but I'd then reverted it again without realising!) Thanks to all for
the prods and advice.
Once I'd done that, the build went through
One last hurdle, you need to remove the media library for JavaFX
(lib/libjfxmedia.dylib) from your bundled JDK. It uses QuickTime and that is
being disowned by apple. This may be fixed in a later 8u update, but not in
8.0.0_b132.
Oh good grief, Apple! So what should we be using instead?
(this);
}
}
On 22.01.13 10:30, Richard Bair wrote:
Is the Java8 plan still there if not should the current Simple*Property
subclasses who overload invalidated be changed to PropertyBase?
It is unlikely that we'll be able to do anything major here in Java 8 just
because we don't really have Lambda
InvalidationListener has one param, ChangeListener has 3. So the arity of the
lambda tells the compiler which kind to produce. If there was ambiguity, the
compiler would complain.
Richard
On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'm looking at Java 8 stuff now
...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.. just figured that out myself.
As my colleague just said to me the world is good again
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com
wrote:
InvalidationListener has one param, ChangeListener has 3. So the arity of
the lambda tells the compiler which
Ah, this is really nice!
BindingBoolean bb = EasyBind.select(control.sceneProperty())
.select(s - s.windowProperty())
.selectObject(w - w.showingProperty());
On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Tomas Mikula tomas.mik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just released EasyBind
So yes, a big THANK YOU to Richard and his team and everyone at Oracle and
all the other individuals and 3rd parties who have contributed to getting
JavaFX (and Java) to where it is today.
You guys/gals should be really proud :-)
I agree, congrats to all the folks inside and outside Oracle
,
Neil
From:Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com
To:Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
Cc:openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Mailing
openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date:03/19/2014 02:46 PM
Subject:Re: Congratulations
Sent by:openjfx
Sadly, still not possible :-(. Though I still think it's a great way to go!
On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:45 PM, Christian Schudt christian.sch...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi together,
I just (re-)read Richard's excellent article
http://fxexperience.com/2011/10/fxml-why-it-rocks-and-the-next-phase/
He
Could you write a single skin that delegates to one or more reusable skins?
On Jan 7, 2014, at 7:26 AM, John Hendrikx hj...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 7/01/2014 14:50, Tomas Mikula wrote:
Interesting ideas. I'm wondering, do you switch skins often enough that you
are worried about performance (and
metadata that help Scene Builder to edit/create FXML
text
- adding some specific UI logic that enables the Inspector panel to present
and let the user edit the value
Doing this requires a pretty deep understanding of SB2 architecture.
Eric
Le 6 janv. 2014 à 17:20, Richard Bair richard.b
If somebody else wanted to contribute, where should they go looking for those
limitations and how to remove them? Or is it very deeply embedded in the code?
On Jan 3, 2014, at 2:15 AM, Eric Le Ponner eric.le.pon...@oracle.com wrote:
Yes, SB currently makes a filtering : for custom components,
MigLayout is a very popular layout engine in Swing and SWT (and also gaining
ground on Android), I think it would be good for SceneBuilder to better
support MigLayout.
+1, I’d love to see enough support in SceneBuilder that any 3rd party layout
container could supply editor support, so that
Hi Tom!
On Jan 4, 2014, at 12:57 PM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
I'm trying to run JavaFX UI tests using TestFX on a headless Jenkins server
(Ubuntu / Debian). I've gotten to the point where the UI is actually started
by Jenkins, but then the test fail with a no suitable pipeline
Have you looked at https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava by chance? I've been dying
to see somebody do an RxJava in JavaFX ever since devoxx and it looks like you
may have inadvertently started down that path :-).
Richard
On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:09 AM, Tomas Mikula tomas.mik...@gmail.com wrote:
Really, really great news! Thanks Simon and Eric and the rest of the team for
getting this done!
Richard
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Simon Vienot simon.vie...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello OpenJFXers !
We're very happy to announce that Scene Builder is now open source, as a part
of the OpenJFX
And Yves! It looks like you made the magic happen :-)
Thanks!
Richard
On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Really, really great news! Thanks Simon and Eric and the rest of the team for
getting this done!
Richard
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:04 AM, Simon
Frankly, I don't think it works. In 9 I wanted to revisit tooling and make JMX
the way metrics are gathered (such as pulse logger stats and such that scenic
view could use that instead of private Apis, etc)
On Nov 12, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Sven Reimers sven.reim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Am 23.10.2013 um 22:30 schrieb Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com:
Yes, definitely.
On Oct 23, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
This is starting to sound like it may also partially address the issue in
the desktop space of supplying a native surface
I *really* doubt this has anything to do with the legal battle, it is much more
likely to be the fact that Dalvik is painfully slow. Using an AOT compiler is
not actually changing anything with regards to the fact that their development
language is Java with a non-TCK compliant set of class
Awesome! Thanks guys. I hope everybody else sees what I see here -- a constant
continually effort to improve OpenJFX and make it a real Open Source project in
every sense of the word. Major thanks to Steve for pushing on this so hard.
Richard
On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Stephen F Northover
JIRA (which is hosted on an Oracle server -- at
least that's what whois says), so adding Crucible should just be a matter of
sending email to your infrastructure people shouldn't it?
Cheers,
Mark
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Yes, we've
Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
If the OS is reporting the wrong value for the default a classic trick is
to create a dummy control that normally has the font we want and query
that.
Steve
On 2013-10-29 11:21 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
Hi guys,
The default font for iOS
not be the ideal solution, but could be
useful for specific use cases, like a video preview overlay. Would that make
any sense?
Scott
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com
wrote:
To do this we need to either solve the auto-layer problem in the NG nodes
„-Djavafx.preloader“ but it doesn’t work, my
preloaded class is not instantiated…
Tobi
Am 21.10.2013 um 21:48 schrieb Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com:
1. Can you provide me with a detailed summary of where the iOS/Android
ports are currently? This includes the platform specific
1) Look and Feel:
IMO it’s enough to build „native looking“ css based skins! That could be very
quickly without complex technologies like CALayer etc.
Generally this should be very easy for somebody to do. There is a ui kit
already out there that designers use for mocking up UI designs for
I would avoid image based CSS files… we should create pure CSS based skins
using pure css styles and SVG paths…
That would definitely be (a lot) more work, but if you're going to be scaling
up the controls you will appreciate them being normal background fills paths.
Richard
javafx, like for instance: a toggle button (a control that looks like a
flip switch)
These have are just styled CheckBoxes (or Toggle buttons, or Radio Buttons).
We've done this for example for DukePad.
, comboboxes where you change the value through a wheel, etc..
Yes, need this kind of
On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Pedro Duque Vieira pedro.duquevie...@gmail.com
wrote:
These have are just styled CheckBoxes (or Toggle buttons, or Radio Buttons).
We've done this for example for DukePad.
Yes that's right but I think that as it is used so much on Android, ios and
windows 8 it
1. Is that mouse emulation supposed to be eliminated due to the latest
lensWindow changes?
I believe that must be handled in higher layers not in the input layer
itself.
2. What is the best way to fix this issue? Reimplementing the mouse emulation
is not a real good solution.
JavaFX
1. Can you provide me with a detailed summary of where the iOS/Android
ports are currently? This includes the platform specific stuff to make
either RoboVM or an Oracle JVM work?
I would say, it is in a good prototype stage. It hasn't had heavy testing, so
the biggest risk is the unknown.
Personally I feel we *have* to go with the layering approach as I don't
believe look-and-feel emulation will ever give a true native experience (as
outlined in my 6 Degrees post).
Has *any* work been done on this layering?
No there hasn't been.
Are there other products on iOS for
Sweet! See you there.
On Oct 18, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Sven Reimers sven.reim...@gmail.com wrote:
Put me down as interested Richard. We can chat a bit on it at Devoxx
Sven
Am 19.10.2013 02:08 schrieb Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com:
That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX
PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com wrote:
Does JavaFX support VP8 and, if not, when will it support it?
On 19 October 2013 11:16, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal issue?
Yes, we don't own the code
That sounds right to me.
On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
I propose the codecs be made pluggable. The licensing issue can be left to
the application developer.
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-2684
Once that is in place, support for whatever
That's pretty much it. VP6, T2K, deploy, FX JMX tooling.
VP6 won't ever be opened because it is licensed 3rd party code. However it
isn't used that much anymore, most folks are using h.264. T2K I will come back
to. Deploy code (meaning, Applets) is not planned to be open sourced, and I
don't
Is the fact that the VP6 decoder is not included because of a legal issue?
Yes, we don't own the code (Google does!) so we can't release it. Google has
opened VP8, the successor to VP6, but not VP6.
Richard
+1 this is my preference. It is useful for things other than FXML, and should
be considered part of our javafx.beans API.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 4:20 AM, Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at wrote:
On 16.10.13 11:22, Eva Krejcirova wrote:
Hi All,
when we retired builders, we caused a
My quick vote would be throwing the exception, but is like to hear from Steve
and Kevin.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 1:04 AM, Pavel Safrata pavel.safr...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
it looks like we can't help releasing a not-fully-baked piece of API with
FX8. We've added bunch of new APIs for 3D
I saw some fix go flying by this morning, check the changelog on graphics and
see if there is a fix.
Cheers
Richard
Looks good to me.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
It seems we are settling on @NamedArgument ... anybody disagree strongly?
Steve
On 2013-10-16 11:45 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
Ya that works too.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Eva
can add themselves to the watchers list.
Steve
On 2013-10-16 1:25 PM, Richard Bair wrote:
Looks good to me.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Stephen F Northover
steve.x.northo...@oracle.com wrote:
It seems we are settling on @NamedArgument ... anybody disagree strongly?
Steve
break (I realize that this is unlikely).
The exception can tell by the message that the operation will be
supported in the future.
Pavel
Steve
On 2013-10-16 10:46 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
My quick vote would be throwing the exception, but is like to hear
from Steve and Kevin
Hi Matthias,
The main point of irritation comes from an quite unclear position about
providing the JVM and JFX of the Java-platform.
That's why I will sumarize what I heard between the lines:
1. there is NO official jvm planned for iOS and Android in the near future.
2. jfx8 is beeing
As frustrating as it is, the fact is that today Oracle has no announced plans
to release any official JVM for Android and iOS. That being the case, the
biggest hurdle to getting FX on iOS and Android is the VM. On the iOS side
there has been some success with RoboVM. On Android you can just use
That being said, this seems like a very common use case, and I wonder if there
is something more we could do (in the longer term, short term do as Artem
suggests)
On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:56 AM, Artem Ananiev artem.anan...@oracle.com wrote:
On 10/7/2013 2:40 AM, Pedro Duque Vieira wrote:
Hi,
next: go through the other modules...
-Sven
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com
richard.b...@oracle.comwrote:
Brian was telling me at J1 that whether parallel gets you performance
or
not depends on the size of the collection and the complexity
I just ran into this as well. Instead of editing mac.gradle, you should copy
gradle.properties.template to gradle.properties, and add
MACOSX_MIN_VERSION=10.8
There should be a more robust way for mac.gradle to find the right version if
the old one isn't available.
Richard
On Oct 7, 2013, at
:
Ok, clear. Then it is time I start looking at the issues that are reported on
MigLayout and the CSS errors Im getting.
Tom
On 2013-10-04 16:03, Richard Bair wrote:
We are presently in full-on bug fixing mode. After October 24 only major,
critical, and blocker bugs are being looked
to achieve a projection plane at Z=0 so that
simple adding of 3D shapes into a 2D scene looks intuitive. The other mode,
where eye is fixed a camera zero, is well suitable for movable camera in the
3d space.
- Chien
On 10/4/2013 9:28 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
Why are they not? It isn't
it is. That's why the terms
keep getting added.
Steve
On 04/10/2013 3:36 PM, Richard Bair wrote:
Ya, event thread, fx thread, ui thread, app thread, FX Application
thread --- they're all the same thing. It would be better if we settled on
one name.
Richard
On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:00
either change in FX 8 is a different matter, though, given how late we
are. The implementation assumes immutability and we would need to change it,
implement it, test it, and then fix any bugs as a result. Seems like we could
add mutability in a subsequent release.
-- Kevin
Richard Bair
After reviewing the situation with Martin my feeling was that this API is just
not ready for prime-time. In fact, I'd like to think of how FXML fits in from a
more holistic perspective, meaning, it might be time to consider a different
approach to loading FXML files than the way FXMLLoader was
Hello, OpenJFX Community.
There's a question about using Java 8 features in FX.
I've been working on the support for InputMethods in JFXPanel which is an
important feature for many users who speak hieroglyphic languages.
The issue is tracked under:
What code needs to call these new methods?
These are used in the JFXPanel to provide the needed information to the
AWT/Swing, so that it could properly position the text composition window and
track what is going on with the text.
I don't know enough about the domain to know what other
.
On Oct 3, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello, OpenJFX Community.
There's a question about using Java 8 features in FX.
I've been working on the support for InputMethods in JFXPanel which is an
important feature for many users who speak hieroglyphic languages
Simple API addition to BackgroundPosition:
/**
* A BackgroundPosition which will center a BackgroundImage.
*/
public static final BackgroundPosition CENTER = new BackgroundPosition(
Side.LEFT, .5, true, Side.TOP, .5, true);
No implementation changes.
Vote: yes
On Sep 25, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Artem Ananiev artem.anan...@oracle.com wrote:
I hereby nominate Joe Andresen to OpenJFX Committer.
Joe is a member of JavaFX Graphics team at Oracle. His first changeset in
Prism is dated by 2009, and total number of commits is close to one hundred.
, at 3:13 PM, Richard Bair richard.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-23446, where the
argument is made that the width / height of a node (specifically, a Region's
prefWidth, minWidth, maxWidth, prefHeight, minHeight, maxHeight) should never
2. Wow, there is a JavaFX enabled Dukepad. Beeing a soldering nerd myself,
hacking firmware and much cool stuff
in my spare time it really kicked me in the first place. Then I grounded when
I have seen that it was a childish puzzle
with lego blocks.
What?
The longer I think about that,
Thanks Tom!
On Sep 27, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
Hi Richard,
I tried to reproduce the bug and so far it has not occurred anymore. So it
seems it has magically resolved itself.
Regards,
Tom
On 2013-09-26 21:56, Richard Bair wrote:
Hi Tom,
Did
Hi Tom,
Did this issue ever get resolved? It sounds very strange indeed, and we should
have a JIRA filed for it if there is not one already.
Thanks
Richard
On Apr 8, 2013, at 3:48 AM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
Hi Werner,
It indeed is very similar (my code is public on Github, so
Hi Scott,
Did this ever get answered? Is the issue reproducible on the latest 8 builds?
Thanks
Richard
On May 8, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
JavaFX 2.2.21-b11
I have a TextField where I have set the skin to the following:
private static class MyEditorSkin
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo