@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger instead of
platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional comments I have are couple typos and a white-space
issue:
1. There is a typo in the Copyright year (201 rather than 2018) in the
following two files:
modules
essage-
From: Kevin Rushforth Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:27 AM
To: Ajit Ghaisas
Cc: Mandy Chung; Daniel Fuchs; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger
instead of platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional comments I have are
>> From: Kevin Rushforth Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:27 AM
>> To: Ajit Ghaisas
>> Cc: Mandy Chung; Daniel Fuchs; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger
>> instead of platform logger in javafx modul
dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger instead of
platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional comments I have are couple typos and a white-space
issue:
1. There is a typo in the Copyright year (201 rather than 2018) in the
following
-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger instead of
platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional comments I have are couple typos and a white-space
issue:
1. There is a typo in the Copyright year (201 rather than 2018) in the
following two
Ghaisas
Cc: Mandy Chung; Daniel Fuchs; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger instead of
platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional comments I have are couple typos and a white-space
issue:
1. There is a typo in the Copyright
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Rushforth
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:27 AM
To: Ajit Ghaisas
Cc: Mandy Chung; Daniel Fuchs; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] Review request : JDK-8195799 : Use System logger instead of
platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional
Hi Ajit,
Looks good to me. I obviously didn't review the
build changes.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 26/03/2018 12:36, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Thanks all for the review.
I have addressed the review comments in
-http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aghaisas/fx/8195799/webrev.1/
The changes are -
1.
-8195799 : Use System logger instead of
platform logger in javafx modules
The only additional comments I have are couple typos and a white-space
issue:
1. There is a typo in the Copyright year (201 rather than 2018) in the
following two files:
modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx
The only additional comments I have are couple typos and a white-space
issue:
1. There is a typo in the Copyright year (201 rather than 2018) in the
following two files:
modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/collections/SetListenerHelper.java
mandy chung wrote:
On 3/23/18 10:51 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the review.
I like the idea of removing the unused levels and methods.
As for directly using System.Logger.Level, we have enough usages of
the Level and convenience logging methods (e.g., "warn",
Hi Kevin,
This sounds reasonable to me.
best regards,
-- daniel
On 23/03/2018 17:51, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the review.
I like the idea of removing the unused levels and methods.
As for directly using System.Logger.Level, we have enough usages of the
Level and
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the review.
I like the idea of removing the unused levels and methods.
As for directly using System.Logger.Level, we have enough usages of the
Level and convenience logging methods (e.g., "warn", "fine", etc.), that
I think it's better to file a follow-up issue (to
Hi Mandy,
On 23/03/2018 17:00, mandy chung wrote:
System::getLogger should return the same instance if it has been
created.
Not necessarily. j.u.l does that, but System::getLogger may return a
new cheap wrapper. As you noted, if JavaFX sources only creates a
handful of loggers, the cost of
Hi Ajit,
I have two remarks,
1. I wonder if it's wise to keep the old unused levels like e.g.
Level.CONFIG in your new PlatformLogger.
The sun.util.logging.PlatformLogger had a bridge that allowed
it to transfer these levels unchanged to java.logging when
java.logging was the
On 3/23/18 9:34 AM, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
Hi Kevin, Mandy and Daniel,
Please review the changeset that removes dependency on sun.util.logging
package from JavaFX code.
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195799
Fix :
16 matches
Mail list logo
