Re: RFR: 8235491: Tree/TableView: implementation of isSelected(int) violates contract [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Ajit Ghaisas
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:21:24 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> 1. reword SelectionModel.isSelected(int) javadoc, removing incorrect >> statement "Is functionally equivalent to calling >> getSelectedIndices().contains(index)." >> 2. reimplement TableView.TableViewSelectionModel.isSelected(int) meth

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:35:37 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> If there are folders that aren't generated by the build task, we should note >> it in the build page of the wiki. > > not sure what you are referring to - getLucene task does not create any > folders. no wiki changes are needed. It cr

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v12]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:22:02 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> The goal of this change is to make sure jfx repo can be imported as a gradle >> project in eclipse and all nested projects in the workspace compile with no >> errors. >> >> - updated .classpath entries in apps/ >> - added utf-8 prefs i

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v12]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:22:02 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> The goal of this change is to make sure jfx repo can be imported as a gradle >> project in eclipse and all nested projects in the workspace compile with no >> errors. >> >> - updated .classpath entries in apps/ >> - added utf-8 prefs i

Re: RFR: 8235491: Tree/TableView: implementation of isSelected(int) violates contract [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:21:24 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> 1. reword SelectionModel.isSelected(int) javadoc, removing incorrect >> statement "Is functionally equivalent to calling >> getSelectedIndices().contains(index)." >> 2. reimplement TableView.TableViewSelectionModel.isSelected(int) meth

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:31:05 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote: >>> For lucene, you'd need to run >>> >>> ``` >>> /bin/sh gradlew getLucene >>> ``` >>> >>> to bring in the dependencies which are not a part of the repository. >> >> Btw, `gradle apps` will also work. > > If there are folders that aren't ge

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v12]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:22:02 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> The goal of this change is to make sure jfx repo can be imported as a gradle >> project in eclipse and all nested projects in the workspace compile with no >> errors. >> >> - updated .classpath entries in apps/ >> - added utf-8 prefs i

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:17:30 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> For lucene, you'd need to run > >> For lucene, you'd need to run >> >> ``` >> /bin/sh gradlew getLucene >> ``` >> >> to bring in the dependencies which are not a part of the repository. > > Btw, `gradle apps` will also work. If ther

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:05:24 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> apps/samples/.classpath line 21: >> >>> 19: >> path="Ensemble8/lib/lucene-core-7.7.3.jar"/> >>> 20: >> path="Ensemble8/lib/lucene-grouping-7.7.3.jar"/> >>> 21: >> path="Ensemble8/lib/lucene-queryparser-7.7.3.jar"/

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v12]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
> The goal of this change is to make sure jfx repo can be imported as a gradle > project in eclipse and all nested projects in the workspace compile with no > errors. > > - updated .classpath entries in apps/ > - added utf-8 prefs in .settings/ Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request increm

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:26:12 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote: >> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional >> commits s

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 20:30:10 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote: >> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional >> commits s

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v8]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:43:04 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: > Thank you all! If there are no more objections, I'd like to get this > integrated, as it will save me from duplicate branches and continuous > cherry-picking. You don't need to do that. Unless 2 branches work on the same code, there will

Re: RFR: 8290473: update Eclipse .classpath in apps, buildSrc [v11]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:58:38 GMT, Andy Goryachev wrote: >> The goal of this change is to make sure jfx repo can be imported as a gradle >> project in eclipse and all nested projects in the workspace compile with no >> errors. >> >> - updated .classpath entries in apps/ >> - added utf-8 prefs i

Re: RFR: 8289542: Update JPEG Image Decoding Software to 9e

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:02:04 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Update libjpeg to current version release [9e](http://www.ijg.org/) of > 16-Jan-2022 > > reference: https://jpegclub.org/reference/reference-sources/ > > Verified all test run on Windows and MacOS Looks good. I tested on all three plat

RFR: 8292353: TableRow vs. TreeTableRow: inconsistent visuals in cell selection mode

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
The issue is caused by TreeTableRow incorrectly selected when cell selection mode is enabled. Changes: - modified TreeTableRow.updateSelection() - Commit messages: - 8292353: update selection Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/875/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader [v3]

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 16:36:24 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: >> Accessibility is not implemented for JavaFX dialogs. This change is to >> implement the accessibility on windows platform. >> Without this fix : On Windows platform, content of Dialog are not read by >> Windows Narrator or JAWS. >> With

Integrated: 8181084: JavaFX show big icons in system menu on macOS with Retina display

2022-08-17 Thread Paul
On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 11:42:58 GMT, Paul wrote: > I hit on JDK-8181084 while making some changes to Scene Builder, so I decided > to investigate. > > Please note: I have not done any Objective-C or MacOS development before. So > I would really like some feedback from someone else who knows this

Re: RFR: 8217853: Cleanup in the D3D native pipeline [v2]

2022-08-17 Thread Nir Lisker
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:03:11 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote: >> Command to run the system test: >> `gradle -PFULL_TEST=true -PUSE_ROBOT=true systemTests:test --tests >> test.robot.test3d.PointLightIlluminationTest` >> >> I ran all the tests, only above test failed: >> Command to run all the system tests

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader [v3]

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:45:10 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > I get the following exception on macOS with VoiceOver when opening any dialog: It is fixed in next [commit](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/873/commits/39d1896751fe6709469ff79380ad15e7493f4879) It was caused when VoiceOver reques

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader [v3]

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
> Accessibility is not implemented for JavaFX dialogs. This change is to > implement the accessibility on windows platform. > Without this fix : On Windows platform, content of Dialog are not read by > Windows Narrator or JAWS. > With this fix: > 1. Windows narrator reads the dialog correctly > 2

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader [v2]

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:33:47 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> Ambarish Rapte has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> review comment : mac NPE > > modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/AccessibleRole.java line > 832: >

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader [v2]

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
> Accessibility is not implemented for JavaFX dialogs. This change is to > implement the accessibility on windows platform. > Without this fix : On Windows platform, content of Dialog are not read by > Windows Narrator or JAWS. > With this fix: > 1. Windows narrator reads the dialog correctly > 2

Re: RFR: 8290274: DRT 27 tests fail due to xml not well formed error on window

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:06:21 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote: > Issue: xml not well-formed error occurs at XML document parser. > Issue: doEnd() call not needed for JAVA platform, as it is making > XMLDocumentParserLibxml2 xml not well-formed error. Additional testing reveals a test failure on macOS tha

Re: RFR: 8235491: Tree/TableView: implementation of isSelected(int) violates contract [v10]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:29:17 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg wrote: >> unnecessary in the case of TableRow. >> the change in TreeTableRow was necessary because otherwise selecting a cell >> by mouse selected the whole row. > >> unnecessary in the case of TableRow. > > that is .. why exactly? > >> t

[jfx11u] Integrated: 8285881: Update WebKit to 614.1

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:35:27 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > This is almost a clean backport, except a small conflict in a test file > `LoadTest.java`. > > The conflict was because > [fix](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/15e52d8f) for > [JDK-8253696](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-82

Re: [jfx11u] RFR: 8285881: Update WebKit to 614.1

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:35:27 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > This is almost a clean backport, except a small conflict in a test file > `LoadTest.java`. > > The conflict was because > [fix](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/15e52d8f) for > [JDK-8253696](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-82

[jfx11u] RFR: 8285881: Update WebKit to 614.1

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
This is almost a clean backport, except a small conflict in a test file `LoadTest.java`. The conflict was because [fix](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/15e52d8f) for [JDK-8253696](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8253696) is not backported to jfx11u. A test `testLoadLocalCSS()` was ad

Re: [jfx11u] RFR: 8285881: Update WebKit to 614.1

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:35:27 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > This is almost a clean backport, except a small conflict in a test file > `LoadTest.java`. > > The conflict was because > [fix](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/15e52d8f) for > [JDK-8253696](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-82

Re: RFR: 8235491: Tree/TableView: implementation of isSelected(int) violates contract [v7]

2022-08-17 Thread Andy Goryachev
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:35:38 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote: >>> hmm .. in TreeTableViewSelectionModelImplTest, I don't see any of the >>> testRowSelectionAfterSelectAndHideLastColumnXX nor >>> testSelectRowWhenInSingleCellSelectionModeIsSelected, what am I missing? >> >> you are right... I am so sor

[jfx17u] RFR: 8291051: Update boot JDK to 17.0.4

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
This bumps the boot JDK used to build jfx17u to JDK 17.0.4. The minimum JDK that can run JavaFX 17.0.x is unchanged and remains at JDK 11. - Commit messages: - 8291051: Update boot JDK to 17.0.4 Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/78/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.

Re: [jfx17u] RFR: 8291051: Update boot JDK to 17.0.4

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:28:16 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This bumps the boot JDK used to build jfx17u to JDK 17.0.4. The minimum JDK > that can run JavaFX 17.0.x is unchanged and remains at JDK 11. Reviewer: @arapte - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx17u/pull/78

[jfx11u] Integrated: 8284676: TreeTableView loses sort ordering when applied on empty table

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:36:52 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Clean backport to jfx11u This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 190dddfb Author:Ambarish Rapte URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/commit/190dddfbac436be26ad9e1f99eeeb7b9ae7990a6 Stats: 15 lines in 2 files

[jfx11u] Integrated: 8289952: Visual Studio libs msvcp140_1.dll and msvcp140_2.dll missing from build

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:35:47 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Clean backport to jfx11u. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 19268eb0 Author:Ambarish Rapte URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/commit/19268eb01c0686b143bbb8bfc34c05a09c13931b Stats: 5 lines in 2 files

[jfx11u] Integrated: 8289587: IllegalArgumentException: Color.rgb's red parameter (-16776961) expects color values 0-255

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:34:42 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Clean backport to jfx11u. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: d3e8fe12 Author:Ambarish Rapte URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/commit/d3e8fe126591d7df04601ff3661eaf6d8151de13 Stats: 180 lines in 3 file

[jfx11u] Integrated: 8088420: JavaFX WebView memory leak via EventListener

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:33:12 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Clean backport to jfx11u. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 24e053bb Author:Ambarish Rapte URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/commit/24e053bb62faf2a99c16f528e9030c416418edc2 Stats: 1509 lines in 11 fi

[jfx11u] Integrated: 8283786: Update to Visual Studio 2022 version 17.1.0 on Windows

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:30:54 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Not a clean backport. > Following two files are not present in jfx11. > > 1. .github/workflows/submit.yml > 2. gradle/verification-metadata.xml This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: dd358152 Author:Ambarish Rapte UR

Re: [jfx11u] RFR: 8283786: Update to Visual Studio 2022 version 17.1.0 on Windows

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:30:54 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Not a clean backport. > Following two files are not present in jfx11. > > 1. .github/workflows/submit.yml > 2. gradle/verification-metadata.xml LGTM - Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead). PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/pu

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:26:48 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Accessibility is not implemented for JavaFX dialogs. This change is to > implement the accessibility on windows platform. > Without this fix : On Windows platform, content of Dialog are not read by > Windows Narrator or JAWS. > With this

[jfx11u] RFR: 8284676: TreeTableView loses sort ordering when applied on empty table

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Clean backport to jfx11u - Commit messages: - 8284676: TreeTableView loses sort ordering when applied on empty table Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/pull/108/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx11u&pr=108&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-

[jfx11u] RFR: 8289952: Visual Studio libs msvcp140_1.dll and msvcp140_2.dll missing from build

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Clean backport to jfx11u. - Commit messages: - 8289952: Visual Studio libs msvcp140_1.dll and msvcp140_2.dll missing from build Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/pull/107/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx11u&pr=107&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org

[jfx11u] RFR: 8289587: IllegalArgumentException: Color.rgb's red parameter (-16776961) expects color values 0-255

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Clean backport to jfx11u. - Commit messages: - 8289587: IllegalArgumentException: Color.rgb's red parameter (-16776961) expects color values 0-255 Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/pull/106/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx11u&pr=106&range=00 Issue: https

[jfx11u] RFR: 8088420: JavaFX WebView memory leak via EventListener

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Clean backport to jfx11u. - Commit messages: - 8088420: JavaFX WebView memory leak via EventListener Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/pull/105/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jfx11u&pr=105&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8088420 Stats:

Re: [jfx11u] RFR: 8283786: Update to Visual Studio 2022 version 17.1.0 on Windows

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:30:54 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Not a clean backport. > Following two files are not present in jfx11. > > 1. .github/workflows/submit.yml > 2. gradle/verification-metadata.xml @kevinrushforth Please take a look, this is not a clean backport. - PR: https:

[jfx11u] RFR: 8283786: Update to Visual Studio 2022 version 17.1.0 on Windows

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Not a clean backport. Following two files are not present in jfx11. 1. .github/workflows/submit.yml 2. gradle/verification-metadata.xml - Commit messages: - 8283786: Update to Visual Studio 2022 version 17.1.0 on Windows Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx11u/pull/104/files Webre

Re: RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:26:48 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Accessibility is not implemented for JavaFX dialogs. This change is to > implement the accessibility on windows platform. > Without this fix : On Windows platform, content of Dialog are not read by > Windows Narrator or JAWS. > With this

Re: RFR: 8181084: JavaFX show big icons in system menu on macOS with Retina display [v9]

2022-08-17 Thread Jose Pereda
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:29:55 GMT, Paul wrote: >> I hit on JDK-8181084 while making some changes to Scene Builder, so I >> decided to investigate. >> >> Please note: I have not done any Objective-C or MacOS development before. So >> I would really like some feedback from someone else who knows

Re: RFR: 8289542: Update JPEG Image Decoding Software to 9e

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:02:04 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote: > Update libjpeg to current version release [9e](http://www.ijg.org/) of > 16-Jan-2022 > > reference: https://jpegclub.org/reference/reference-sources/ > > Verified all test run on Windows and MacOS Can you rerun the macOS GHA job? It ti

Re: RFR: 8181084: JavaFX show big icons in system menu on macOS with Retina display [v8]

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:46:26 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote: >> Paul has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit >> since the last revision: >> >> A few more minor code cleanups > > Looks good @jperedadnr can you re-review (only minor change since you last approved it)? --

Re: RFR: 8181084: JavaFX show big icons in system menu on macOS with Retina display [v9]

2022-08-17 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:29:55 GMT, Paul wrote: >> I hit on JDK-8181084 while making some changes to Scene Builder, so I >> decided to investigate. >> >> Please note: I have not done any Objective-C or MacOS development before. So >> I would really like some feedback from someone else who knows

RFR: 8289542: Update JPEG Image Decoding Software to 9e

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Update libjpeg to current version release [9e](http://www.ijg.org/) of 16-Jan-2022 reference: https://jpegclub.org/reference/reference-sources/ Verified all test run on Windows and MacOS - Commit messages: - Merge branch 'master' into jpeg-9e - lib jpeg 9e Changes: https://git.o

Re: RFR: 8287604: Update MarlinFX to 0.9.4.6 [v6]

2022-08-17 Thread Laurent Bourgès
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 21:48:37 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> fixed dpqs javadoc + tests (setupOnce) > > modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/marlin/DualPivotQuicksor

Re: RFR: 8287604: Update MarlinFX to 0.9.4.6 [v2]

2022-08-17 Thread Laurent Bourgès
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:35:08 GMT, Johan Vos wrote: >> Laurent Bourgès has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> added test for huge polygon coords > > Building and testing works, I am looking into the diffs as well now. > The Dual

RFR: 8087557: [Win] [Accessibility, Dialogs] Alert Dialog content is not fully read by Screen Reader

2022-08-17 Thread Ambarish Rapte
Accessibility is not implemented for JavaFX dialogs. This change is to implement the accessibility on windows platform. Without this fix : On Windows platform, content of Dialog are not read by Windows Narrator or JAWS. With this fix: 1. Windows narrator reads the dialog correctly 2. JAWS fails t

Re: RFR: 8181084: JavaFX show big icons in system menu on macOS with Retina display [v8]

2022-08-17 Thread Paul
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:15:36 GMT, Paul wrote: >> I hit on JDK-8181084 while making some changes to Scene Builder, so I >> decided to investigate. >> >> Please note: I have not done any Objective-C or MacOS development before. So >> I would really like some feedback from someone else who knows

Re: RFR: 8181084: JavaFX show big icons in system menu on macOS with Retina display [v9]

2022-08-17 Thread Paul
> I hit on JDK-8181084 while making some changes to Scene Builder, so I decided > to investigate. > > Please note: I have not done any Objective-C or MacOS development before. So > I would really like some feedback from someone else who knows this stuff > better. > > Anyway, after some googlin