On 21/10/2011 3:04 AM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
1. In 0.5.0 you could use slash or backslash (which is more "correct"
in Windows) - no difference. Now only slash works, backslash is
ommited and replaced with... nothing...
2. When running OpenOCD as External Tool from Eclipse I always left
"Working
On 27/09/2011 7:37 AM, Akos Vandra wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Akos Vandra
Date: 26 September 2011 23:36
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] ft2232_transfer why bit-by-bit?
To: Laurent Gauch
Hi!
Sorry, it seems like I wanted to do too much too fast. Turns out I
don't ha
mon sleep 100
mon reg pc 0x11029000
mon reg cpsr 0x00d7
continue
All the extra setting of pc and arm core mode may be more than required
in places, but this had given me a perfectly reliable connection
sequence in eclipse. Earlier with less/
On 14/07/2011 10:43 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Uwe Bonnes
wrote:
Hello,
are there any other published FTDI->SWD hardware setup beside KTLINL
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/stm32primer2swd/index.php?title=File:Ktlink-buffers.png
that support SWD and are sup
On 13/07/2011 11:48 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Andrew Leech wrote:
Again just a release tarball issue, but the tarball from above doesn't work
properly, it needs bootstrap run to get jimtcl etc
In particular for a release it's really really important that the two
separate packages (O
On 11 July 2011 07:31, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
rc2
http://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openocd/openocd;a=snapshot;h=d4cd6f032015552f00bf4b5a90f25f5f958e9d9e;sf=tgz
I'm assuming some testing would be good :-) I'm just moving into a
firmware project again, so
On 11/07/2011 9:08 PM, Hard Maker wrote:
Hi List,
I'm starting with OpenOCD and have a questions about wath hi level
application can use with openOCD. Basically I need/want run
aplications and know the var values. Using OpenOCD I can flash, view
registry state, run, etc. But there are some apl
On 5/07/2011 8:36 AM, Andrew Leech wrote:
On 4/07/2011 6:22 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 4 July 2011 08:12, Andrew Leech wrote:
On 1/07/2011 8:47 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 1 July 2011 00:41, Andrew Leechwrote:
Only problem is, it's incredibly slow, unusably slow. A single
ste
On 4/07/2011 6:22 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 4 July 2011 08:12, Andrew Leech wrote:
On 1/07/2011 8:47 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 1 July 2011 00:41, Andrew Leechwrote:
Only problem is, it's incredibly slow, unusably slow. A single step can
take
5 seconds, where on a norma
On 4/07/2011 5:26 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Leech wrote:
Stepping is still slow though. I'm wondering if this is related to my cygwin
on this machine, I've noticed that configure scripts on anything run
incredibly slowly, never found out why. I
On 1/07/2011 8:47 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 1 July 2011 00:41, Andrew Leech wrote:
Only problem is, it's incredibly slow, unusably slow. A single step can take
5 seconds, where on a normal tcp connection with same configs feels close to
instant, so maybe about 1/4 of a second. Did
On 30/06/2011 6:13 PM, Spencer Oliver wrote:
On 30 June 2011 07:47, Andrew Leech wrote:
Have you used it successfully? Helios has that too (since early 2011?), but
I've never got it running. I've just updated to indigo and still can't make
it work.
I ran a few tests yesterda
liver
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:13 AM
To: Andrew Leech
Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] eclipse indigo
On 30 June 2011 07:47, Andrew Leech wrote:
Have you used it successfully? Helios has that too (since early 2011?), but
I've never got it run
Have you used it successfully? Helios has that too (since early 2011?),
but I've never got it running. I've just updated to indigo and still
can't make it work.
When trying to start a debug session, it eventually just hangs in the
openocd startup process after it's detected my device, regardle
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I tried this with a big enough buffer on a real device and it
> segfaulted.
>
Wasn't most/all of the required code for dynamic buffer resizing
already present in the code but commented out with #if 0 #else #end
lines? It sounds like this mig
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Jean-Claude Repetto wrote:
> Hello,
> I am currently designing a custom development board for a system based on an
> EFM32 ARM-Cortex M3 device.
> I would like to integrate a JTAG adapter on this board, so that software
> developers don't need to buy an external ad
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Phil Fong wrote:
> I've been programming Lattice XP2 FPGAs with SVF using a git checkout from
> the beginning of February. (So, to answer Oyvind svf at least partially
> works.) However, I've noticed that the echo to the screen does not echo the
> first line of
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Leech
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28/02/2011 7:01 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>>
>>> Has anyone used the SVF support recently?
>>>
>>> I'
On 28/02/2011 7:01 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Has anyone used the SVF support recently?
I've tried to use svf, but it doesn't work in my case.
I've attached a test file + I've modified OpenOCD so
it is possible to reproduce this problem without any
interface or target hardware.
./configure --ena
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Bernard Mentink wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Andrew, yes, I have checked all the settings in the Debug Configuration
> settings and they all point to the correct files, and I have the correct
> file in my load command, but gdb is crashing even before it connects to
> openoc
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Bernard Mentink wrote:
> Hi All,
> I apologize for posting a somewhat openocd off-topic question, but I am in a
> bind.
> I have been using openocd and gdb from within eclipse quite happily, until I
> duplicated a project to start a new one, and tried debugging it
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Andrew Leech wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>> Andrew Leech wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>>
>>>> Ping.
>>>
>>> I never delved much into the actual SVF c
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
> Andrew Leech wrote:
>> On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
>
>>> Ping.
>>
>> I never delved much into the actual SVF commands, so can't
>> comment on the basic logic of it, however if the n
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
> openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de wrote:
>> They didn't have any 0.05" pre-crimped solutions that I could
>> find.
>
> Crimping your own is not hard with something solid to push down with (bit of
> wood or such).
>
>> It seems like ev
On 06/01/2011, at 3:12 PM, Jon Povey wrote:
> Jon Povey wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Povey
>>
>> min_time was effectively ignored, I needed it to program a
>> Lattice MachXO
>> which uses a RUNTEST to wait for an erase operation, amongst
>> other things.
>>
>> With this patch pauses happen and
t; Could you read over the patch now and write up a commit comment?
>
> To create a patch, try:
>
> git add .
> git commit --author="Andrew Leech "
> => type commit comment
> git format-patch HEAD^
Could you let me know what your platform / configure options are th
On 05/12/2010, at 7:49 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> On 2010-12-04 19:29, Michael Schwingen wrote:
>> Just because the current files are hard-wired in a way that suits you
>> does not mean they work fine for everyone.
>
> Have you considered opposite approach? Just because the need of creating
>
On 04/12/2010, at 7:43 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> How's this one coming?
>
>
I'm happy with the previous set of patches I submitted (nov 30), it's been
working well for me for the past couple of weeks with no issues.
Andrew
>
___
Openocd-develop
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Andrew Leech [2010-11-17 14:02 +1100]:
>>
>> Yep I rewrote the command line parser, so the usage is now:
>> "usage: svf [-tap device.tap] [-quiet] "
>>
>> Arguments are checked in a loop so it will
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andrew Leech wrote:
>> > (A note that you can send patches easily by first committing and then
>> > using the git send-email command.)
>>
>> Ok I'm still pretty new to git, so by committing it just adds
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andrew Leech wrote:
>>
>> I'll look into that, I've not used snprintf so don't really know the
>> difference. It's obviously only a google away. I'm just used to
>> sprintf from embedded de
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 16/11/2010, at 11:36 AM, Andrew Leech wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Steve Bennett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/11/2010, at 11:15 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>>>
>>>> On
Note newer patch attached. This is made directly against current git,
use instead of original patch.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Leech wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
>>> COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_svf_command)
>>> {
>>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/svf/svf.c b/src/svf/svf.c
>> index 62e2324..c7401c3 100644
>> --- a/src/svf/svf.c
>> +++ b/src/svf/svf.c
>> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static uint8_t *svf_tdi_buffer = NULL, *svf_tdo_buffer =
>> NULL, *svf_mask_buffer
>> static i
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> svf/xsvf has been a somewhat peripheral feature of OpenOCD
> and I couldn't possibly comment on whether this patch should
> be applied or not.
>
> Do you feel it's ready to be applied if there are no protests?
>
Ok just as a follow up I've
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> On 16/11/2010, at 11:15 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Steve Bennett
>> wrote:
>>> On 16/11/2010, at 9:27 AM, Andrew Leech wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Andrew Leech
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
>>> There's specific HDR and similar commands in svf to define these
>>> paddings.
>>
>>> Some software like UrJtag ignores these commands
Hi all,
I've just found a compiling/usage difficulty with the git version on
cygwin. Apparently somewhere between 0.4.0 and mainline (possibly
jimtcl?) openocd no longer handles dos line endings on config files.
Apparently all my config files of my existing 0.4.0 installation have
dos line endings
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> There's specific HDR and similar commands in svf to define these
>> paddings.
>
> Can you say more about them? Did you study the SVF output by
> FlashPro? It would be interesting to diff a failing SVF with a
> working one.
>
Yeah I've just b
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> Andrew Leech wrote:
> > Now I need to figure out how to bypass the lpc via software rather
> > than physically changing the chain. I can't seem to find much
> > information about how bypass works with open
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andrew Leech wrote:
> > On a different matter, I'm currently using this part on a chain with an
> > Actel A3P125 FPGA
>
> I'd look at buying an IGLOO Icicle ($69 or something). It includes an
> Actel "L
here be a different way to flash the actel
with openocd not using svf?
Thanks,
Andrew Leech
lpc3131.cfg
Description: Binary data
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
42 matches
Mail list logo
