Re: [Openocd-development] git gui/cola doesn't push to review

2011-11-30 Thread Mathias K.
FYI i have append i picture from what i can select in the gui. If i select review as remote the error message looks like this: # Pushing to ssh://hidden@openocd.zylin.com:29418/openocd.git # remote: Resolving deltas: 0% (0/2) # To ssh://hidden@openocd.zylin.com:29418/openocd.git # ! [remote

[Openocd-development] git gui/cola doesn't push to review

2011-11-29 Thread Mathias K.
Hello, i have a little problem with git gui to push the commits to the review server. If i try to push i can choose the review as target but it will always pushed into the master and i got a error message. The console command git push review works. Any hints? Thanks Regards, Mathias

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui/cola doesn't push to review

2011-11-29 Thread Peter Stuge
Mathias K. wrote: If i try to push i can choose the review as target but it will always pushed into the master and i got a error message. The console command git push review works. Any hints? Can you choose which local branch to push, and which branch on the remote that it should be pushed

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-27 Thread Luca Ottaviano
On 26/10/2011 01:52, jim norris wrote: For those using a git gui, what are you using? 'gitg' on Linux. Having a GUI for hunk selection and commit is by far fastest then jumping trough various shells when writing a meaningful changelog message for the changes you are committing. Otherwise,

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-27 Thread Pete Batard
Apologies to anyone for annoying this list again with what are mostly discussions about the libusb dysfunctionality. If you aren't interested in finding why projects become dysfunctional, and why people will take palliative action then, please ignore. On 2011.10.27 00:53, Peter Stuge wrote:

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-27 Thread Marti Bolivar
On 10/27/2011 06:43 AM, Luca Ottaviano wrote: Having a GUI for hunk selection and commit is by far fastest then jumping trough various shells when writing a meaningful changelog message for the changes you are committing. +1. I use magit from within emacs for this (among other things). The

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.10.26 06:07, Øyvind Harboe wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Peter Stugepe...@stuge.se wrote: jim norris wrote: For those using a git gui, what are you using? On which system? For Windows, there is Git Extensions and TortoiseGit. The Git Extensions looked less slick than

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Øyvind Harboe
Hi Pete, thanks for the corrections about my prejudice against Tortoise. I guess my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase, rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature. Gerrit is

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Peter Stuge
Øyvind Harboe wrote: my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase, rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature. This might fit Pete. In another project I've learned that he prefers

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Øyvind Harboe
I have a problems with a GUI that makes git easy to use at the cost of not enabling and teaching the user to use the more advanced concepts. Interactive rebasing is an absolute must when working with git. Anything that leaves the user with the impression that he doesn't have to get his head

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Austin, Alex
-Original Message- From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd- development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Pete Batard Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6:26 AM To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Pete Batard
On 2011.10.26 16:29, Peter Stuge wrote: Øyvind Harboe wrote: my main problem has been that that I've found that those that use Tortoise have no patience for the complexities and necessity of interactive rebase, rather than Tortoise lack of support for this feature. This might fit Pete. In

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-26 Thread Peter Stuge
Pete Batard wrote: Git is just a tool, feel free to use it as you see fit, GUI or not. Yes and no. Git is a tool, and of course there are good and bad GUIs, but the point is that since it's common to work together with others, and since this is also the setting where git really shines, it's a

[Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-25 Thread jim norris
For those using a git gui, what are you using? ___ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-25 Thread Austin, Alex
25, 2011 7:13 PM To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] git gui jim norris wrote: For those using a git gui, what are you using? On which system? For Windows, there is Git Extensions and TortoiseGit. The Git Extensions looked less slick than

Re: [Openocd-development] git gui

2011-10-25 Thread Øyvind Harboe
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: jim norris wrote: For those using a git gui, what are you using? On which system? For Windows, there is Git Extensions and TortoiseGit. The Git Extensions looked less slick than TortoiseGit last time I looked, but