OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpkg-we
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpkg-we
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-web
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-web
roup:Web
License: ASF
Version: %{V_apache}
-Release: 20031124
+Release: 20031125
# package options (suexec related)
%option with_suexec yes
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@
%option with_mod_php_unixodbc no
%option with
p.spec25 Nov 2003 14:55:17 - 1.92
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
Group:Database
License: GPL
Version: 2.1.23
-Release: 20031123
+Release: 20031125
# package options
%option with_fsl yes
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
# build infor
1,11 @@
Group:Security
License: BSD
Version: %{V_base}%{V_portable}
-Release: 20031030
+Release: 20031125
# package options
%option with_fsl yes
%option with_pam no
-%option with_pcre no
%option with_skey
0 Nov 2003 11:16:38 - 1.108
+++ openpkg-src/rt/rt.spec25 Nov 2003 15:59:04 - 1.109
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
Group:Database
License: GPL
Version: %{V_here}
-Release: 20031120
+Release: 20031125
# package options
%option wi
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
is
+Packager: The OpenPKG Project
+Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
+Group: Compiler
+License: Freeware
+Version: 1.0
+Release: 20031125
+
+# list of sources
+Source0: http://students.ceid.upatras.gr/~sxanth/lwc/lwc-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Patch0:
Request 289 was acted upon.
_
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/289
Ticket: [OpenPKG #289]
Subject: spamassassin/imagemagick file conflicts
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queue: openpkg
Owner: N
Packager: The OpenPKG Project
+Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
+Group:System
+License: LGPL
+Version: 0.7
+Release: 20031125
+
+# list of sources
+Source0: http://download.sourceforge.net/xmlrpcpp/xmlrpc++%{version}.tar.gz
+
+# build informa
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael Schloh
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Thomas Lotterer
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael Schloh
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src openpkg-web
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-11-25 19:33
Tracking Duration: 0:33:12 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:936 sources (629 packages)
Tracking Result: 864 up-to-date, 3 out-dated, 46 error
The following 3 sources were determined to be out-da
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Michael Schloh wrote:
> Plus should be allowed, at least for package names
Hmmm... I don't think we should not allow more special characters.
Because this makes it even more harder to match RPM filenames and opens
it too much IMHO. I would prefer "xmlrpcxx" or something
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, OpenPKG Version Tracker wrote:
> db4.1.254.2.50
> mplayer:live 2003.11.212003.11.25
> perl-util:Test-Harness2.36 2.38
> xmlrpc++ 0.7
Shit, and it also break
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, OpenPKG Version Tracker wrote:
>
> > db4.1.254.2.50
> > mplayer:live 2003.11.212003.11.25
> > perl-util:Test-Harness2.36 2.3
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-web openpk
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Michael Schloh wrote:
>
> > Plus should be allowed, at least for package names
>
> Hmmm... I don't think we should not allow more special characters. [...]
>
Package names were originally documented in
http://www.openp
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
Request 290 was acted upon.
_
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/290
Ticket: [OpenPKG #290]
Subject: PEAR package(s)
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queue: openpkg
Owner: Nobody
Status: new
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Michael Schloh wrote:
>> Plus should be allowed, at least for package names
>
> Hmmm... I don't think we should not allow more special characters.
>
I added 'plus' partially because I noticed that 'minus' was already valid
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-11-26 07:30
Tracking Duration: 0:30:00 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:936 sources (629 packages)
Tracking Result: 883 up-to-date, 7 out-dated, 46 error
The following 7 sources were determined to be out-da
26 matches
Mail list logo
