Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Well, I'll try to stay in sync with OpenPKG 2.4, and will try (and retry) this damn't build. My current test is : ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=aix --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-3.4.4 --disable-nls using gcc 3.3.2, AIX as, ld and nm. Hope and pray 2005/5/27, Ralf S. Engelsch

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > So for OpenPKG 2.4 (next release), I must find how to make a working gcc 3.4.4 You can try to use the gcc40 package from CURRENT, too... Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
well, I still didn't understand why gcc 3.4.3 as built one time and failed now ;( BTW gcc 3.4.3 generated gcc and g++ but has failed somewhere in stdlibc++ so I couldn't link C++ stuff with my current rpm ;( Borring, how borring So for OpenPKG 2.4 (next release), I must find how to make a workin

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Great. BTW, we should also fix a serious problem : gcc 3.4.x still didn't build on my AIX (PASE) box, battling with gcc people but can't find what should be use ad minima. Strange gcc 4.0.0 works out of the box on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.3.2 as builder. Could we retain gcc 4.0.0 for AIX and next Ope

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > Urg, the information is on openpkg-dev but if you're confortable with > the current state of OpenPKG current, I could try a whole new build : > > - openpkg bootstrap and next the mandatory rpms No, no, wait. Until now we've not taken over anything (excep

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Here is what I added to rpm.patch.porting : rpm.patch.porting.patch Description: Binary data

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Ralf, did you include my rpm patches ? 2005/5/27, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Urg, the information is on openpkg-dev but if you're confortable with > the current state of OpenPKG current, I could try a whole new build : > > - openpkg bootstrap and next the mandatory rpms > > 2005/5/27, R

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Urg, the information is on openpkg-dev but if you're confortable with the current state of OpenPKG current, I could try a whole new build : - openpkg bootstrap and next the mandatory rpms 2005/5/27, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > Ralf w

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > Ralf when did the next release of OpenPKG is planned ? OpenPKG 2.4 is planned for June 2005. > If I should do the whole process, ie openpkg bootstrap and others, I'd > like to do it on a stable release. Well, but for this we first have to merge all you

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Ralf when did the next release of OpenPKG is planned ? If I should do the whole process, ie openpkg bootstrap and others, I'd like to do it on a stable release. 2005/5/27, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well under true AIX the command should be similar to Linux. > > But on PASE you only hav

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Well under true AIX the command should be similar to Linux. But on PASE you only have a subset of AIX, and so no /etc/passwd or /dev/random, /dev/urandom for example. 2005/5/27, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > [...] > > > Btw, doesn't a

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > [...] > > Btw, doesn't a /usr/bin/oslevel exist in PASE? > > Nope but I could insert a command in PATH if necessary. I just asked because "shtool platform" first tries to use this AIX specific command for determining the OS version. Interesting that it d

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
> A, ok. Now fixed in GNU shtool and a snapshot of it is now included > in the latest "openpkg" package from CURRENT. At least this now shows > the correct identification for both an emulated uname of an AIX 5.2 > under PASE (according to your output above) and a real AIX 5.1. Ok your new shto

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > > > BTW, I wonder know how to tweak the OpenPKG bootstrap to have correct > > > > RPM naming something like ppc64-aixd5.2. > > > > > > > > For now I've got for example : > > > > > > > > automake-1.9.5-2.3

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Here is was I have on Linux PPC (Suse SLES 9) alaska:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # /root/shtool platform --type=all-in-one concise architecture class: ppc64 regular architecture class: ppc64 verbose architecture class: ppc64 concise architecture product:ppc64 regular architecture p

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Henri Gomez
> On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > BTW, I wonder know how to tweak the OpenPKG bootstrap to have correct > > > RPM naming something like ppc64-aixd5.2. > > > > > > For now I've got for example : > > > > > > automake-1.9.5-2.3.0.powerpc-2.0-Qop.rpm > > > > Any reply on this ? > > T

Re: OpenPKG for AIX - current state

2005-05-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, May 27, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote: > > BTW, I wonder know how to tweak the OpenPKG bootstrap to have correct > > RPM naming something like ppc64-aixd5.2. > > > > For now I've got for example : > > > > automake-1.9.5-2.3.0.powerpc-2.0-Qop.rpm > > Any reply on this ? This naming directly is d