Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005, F. Even wrote:
Your machine has no Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG) or the
existing PRNG has no entropy source or the entropy source doesn't
provide any data. Make sure a /dev/random or at least /dev/urandom
exists. For FreeBSD configure
Any particular reason anyone can think of that this would be hanging on
my FreeBSD 4.7 box?
bash-2.05b# /openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -Uvh
bind-9.3.0-2.2.0.ix86-freebsd4.7-openpkg.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:bind
Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005, F. Even wrote:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005, F. Even wrote:
Just add to your prefix/etc/rc.conf:
postfix_log_numfiles=20
postfix_log_minsize=
As already pointed out
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Just add to your prefix/etc/rc.conf:
postfix_log_numfiles=20
postfix_log_minsize=
This way the logs should be rotated every night, independent of
the size and the last 20 logfiles are kept.
OK...very nifty, thanks!! I'm guessing then that the rc.application
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005, F. Even wrote:
Just add to your prefix/etc/rc.conf:
postfix_log_numfiles=20
postfix_log_minsize=
This way the logs should be rotated every night, independent of
the size and the last 20 logfiles are kept.
I've made these changes to my /cw/etc
Where can I find information on how to configure logging?
I've taken a look through the handbook (albeit a quick look) and none of
the topics jump out as related to logging, and the ones I have read give
no info (rc related topics, install, files, etc.). I've finally pulled
postfix into my
I'm attempting to create a certificate for use with stunnelhitting
the stunnel.org site and openssl.org, I find continued reference to
scripts and other files that the openpkg distribution of openssl seems
to be missing, one of the main ones being CA.pl. I'm having a hard
enough time not
I'm suddenly getting a perl error executing openpkg build -Ua. I don't
recall making any changes that might have caused this. I was playing w/
ImageMagick awhile back the last time I had some free time, but I only
recall adding packages of all sorts, not removing any.
Here is the error I'm
F. Even wrote:
I'm suddenly getting a perl error executing openpkg build -Ua. I don't
recall making any changes that might have caused this. I was playing w/
ImageMagick awhile back the last time I had some free time, but I only
recall adding packages of all sorts, not removing any.
Here
Is there any possibility of getting a version of the package that does
not require X, or is there a way to pass the source RPM options to
remove the X dependency and get it to compile with the flag not requiring X.
I grabbed the source and tried to install it, but it doesn't appear to
see a
Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] what I'm asking is, can I do the following:
Take openpkg-20040609-20040609.src.rpm, modify the spec file as
described earlier to make this a 1.9 bootstrap. Then after
converting the database, I should install the openpkg
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] seem then that the 1.9 bootstrap would need an upgrade
I created the upgrade companion packages and added them to the
ftp download area ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.0/UPD/
openpkg-1.9.3-2.0.3.src.rpm
openpkg-1.9.2-2.0.2
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] seem then that the 1.9 bootstrap would need an upgrade
I created the upgrade companion packages and added them to the
ftp download area ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.0/UPD/
openpkg-1.9.3-2.0.3.src.rpm
openpkg
I'm currently running OpenPKG 1.3. I'm in the process of upgrading my
FreeBSD 4.0 box to OpenPKG 2.0. I'm noticing on the release schedule
that OPKG 2.1 should be out shortly. Is there any reason, considering
this, that I shouldn't just upgrade to OPKG-current? ...and if I were
to do that,
On 12/9/03 4:24 AM, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Frank,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003, F. Even wrote:
I'm looking to build Apache with some of the options turned on. Do I need
to specify --define on the --rebuild of the .src.rpm step, or can I specify
that after
On 11/18/03 3:10 AM, Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003, F. Even wrote:
I was curious, do I need to upgrade through all the patch levels, or can I
just apply the latest patch-level.
[...] you don't need
I was curious, do I need to upgrade through all the patch levels, or can I
just apply the latest patch-level.
For example:
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.3/UPD/
coreutils-5.0.1-1.3.1.src.rpm 3946 KB 10/21/03 8:16:00 AM
coreutils-5.0.1-1.3.2.src.rpm 3947 KB 10/23/03 1:17:00 PM
Now, if I
On 11/14/03 2:07 AM, Matthias Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003, F. Even wrote:
First off, I would like to say you guys have done an awesome job w/ OpenPKG.
You have saved me lots of trouble having to upgrade my FreeBSD 4.0R box that
is in a remote location. The ports
On 11/14/03 11:02 PM, Matthias Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003, F. Even wrote:
On 11/14/03 2:07 AM, Matthias Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003, F. Even wrote:
First off, I would like to say you guys have done an awesome job w/
OpenPKG.
You have
First off, I would like to say you guys have done an awesome job w/ OpenPKG.
You have saved me lots of trouble having to upgrade my FreeBSD 4.0R box that
is in a remote location. The ports collection no longer works correctly,
packages are hit and miss...but now OpenPKG to the rescue.
I was
20 matches
Mail list logo
