Re: postfix starting bug

2006-03-22 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Dienstag, 21. März 2006 12:47 schrieb Torsten Homeyer: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: [...] Thus I am suggesting the following patch (only minimally tested). [...] +{ ! ps -elf|grep postfix/m[a]ster /dev/null 21 \ +

Re: postfix starting bug

2006-03-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: [...] Talking about shell portability, you probably know a lot more than I do. I have looked up POSIX for ps and -elf are posix options. grin Yes, I know. They even can be _used_ without errors on a BSD system. But unfortunately (for historical

Re: postfix starting bug

2006-03-21 Thread Simon J Mudd
Torsten Homeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: [...] Thus I am suggesting the following patch (only minimally tested). [...] +{ ! ps -elf|grep postfix/m[a]ster /dev/null 21 \ + /kolab/libexec/postfix/master

Re: postfix starting bug (was: Not getting error msgs.)

2006-03-20 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Montag, 20. März 2006 18:41 schrieb Bill Campbell: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: Am Montag, 20. März 2006 13:32 schrieb Bernhard Reiter: Using OpenPKG 2.5 b) postfix /kolab/sbin/postfix start failed, because of an old master.pid (without process). The message of

Re: postfix starting bug (was: Not getting error msgs.)

2006-03-20 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Montag, 20. März 2006 18:52 schrieb Bernhard Reiter: Am Montag, 20. März 2006 18:41 schrieb Bill Campbell: On Mon, Mar 20, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote: Am Montag, 20. März 2006 13:32 schrieb Bernhard Reiter: Using OpenPKG 2.5 b) postfix /kolab/sbin/postfix start failed,