Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] what I'm asking is, can I do the following:
Take openpkg-20040609-20040609.src.rpm, modify the spec file as
described earlier to make this a 1.9 bootstrap. Then after
converting the database, I should install the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] seem then that the 1.9 bootstrap would need an upgrade
I created the upgrade companion packages and added them to the
ftp download area ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.0/UPD/
openpkg-1.9.3-2.0.3.src.rpm
openpkg-1.9.2-2.0.2.src.rpm [*]
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
To build the packages I used openpkg-tools in ver 1.3 that could check
dependencies and build them first if needed.
OpenPKG 1.x had openpkg-tool and OpenPKG CURRENT (to be used for
2.0, too) has openpkg-tools (note the 's'). Find more details
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] seem then that the 1.9 bootstrap would need an upgrade
I created the upgrade companion packages and added them to the
ftp download area ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.0/UPD/
openpkg-1.9.3-2.0.3.src.rpm
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, F. Even wrote:
It dies in pretty much the same place trying to go from 1.9.1-2.0.1.
OK, I assume you give 1.9.3 or a very recent CURRENT a try, too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm --rebuild openpkg-1.9.1-2.0.1.src.rpm
snip
main.c:1014:2: #error lack of strtoll() needs fixing
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, F. Even wrote:
[...] seem then that the 1.9 bootstrap would need an upgrade
I created the upgrade companion packages and added them to the
ftp download area ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.0/UPD/
openpkg-1.9.3-2.0.3.src.rpm
I couldn't find the openpkg-tools source in any of the 2.0 ftp directories.
I do found a package in the CURRENT branche with this name.
Should I use this one ?
Is it intencionaly not in the 2.0 branch ?
I'm not upgrading, I'm installing 2.0 from scratch, so how should I proceed if
the sources
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alexander,
I couldn't find the openpkg-tools source in any of the 2.0 ftp
directories. I do found a package in the CURRENT branche with this
name. Should I use this one? Is it intencionaly not in the 2.0 branch?
Yes and yes. The openpkg-tool has
Should I expect any known problem using OpenPKG over RH-7.3 ?
I have a lot done to build a HA cluster between two RH-7.3 and whant use the
servers like OpenLdap, Apache, Postfix from OpenPkg-2.0.
So far I build tha basic openpkg-2.0.3 rom source, openpkg-tools and gcc with no
problems, but whant
What is the sintax for `openpkg build foo` and have it use something like:
-define with_zlib yes or if possible a short way like -D with_zlib
Is it possible to get the same options used when upgrading a package ? How ?
thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:26:56PM -0300, Alexander Belck wrote:
What is the sintax for `openpkg build foo` and have it use something like:
-define with_zlib yes or if possible a short way like -D with_zlib
just as you say:
-Dwith_zlib
builds with
--define with_zlib yes
If you have
Due to build perl-* I tryed to build x11 with
openpkg build x11 | sh
where I got a lot of errors starting with:
** ERROR: SOME X11 INFORMATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED!!
** ERROR: SOME X11 INFORMATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED!!
**
**
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 14:59, Alexander Belck wrote:
Should I expect any known problem using OpenPKG over RH-7.3 ?
I have a lot done to build a HA cluster between two RH-7.3 and whant use the
servers like OpenLdap, Apache, Postfix from OpenPkg-2.0.
So far I build tha basic openpkg-2.0.3
Frank,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:16, Frank Torres wrote:
I trying to build subversion with mod_dav_svn has anybody got it compile
with shared libraries on solaris 9/sparc systems.
No experience with it on Solaris, but I do in RH. Should be similar
since it's OpenPKG, supposed to be platform
14 matches
Mail list logo
