Re: Ever rebuilding openpkg-2.1.0

2004-07-24 Thread Michael van Elst
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:59:01AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: That's a known bug in the openpkg build command (see http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg-tools/TODO for a list of known issues). It works fine for CURRENT, but when updating a RELEASE it always thinks that the openpkg

../openpkg build samba is giving an I/O error [FreeBSD 4.STABLE]

2004-07-24 Thread Simon J Mudd
Hello, I'm having trouble using openpkg build on FreeBSD and am consistently getting an I/O error. I am not sure how to identify the problem further. I installed the following openpkg packages by hand (built locally): bash-2.05a# pwd /openpkg/RPM/PKG bash-2.05a# /openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -qa

Re: Ever rebuilding openpkg-2.1.0

2004-07-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote: On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:59:01AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: That's a known bug in the openpkg build command (see http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg-tools/TODO for a list of known issues). It works fine for CURRENT, but when

Re: Ever rebuilding openpkg-2.1.0

2004-07-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote: [..] One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this if possible. The following patch therefore will simply select the database entry with the smallest version number, i.e. OpenPKG-2.1.0-2.1.0 when deciding on wether it

Re: uninstall openpkg?

2004-07-24 Thread v8625
After several attempts to recover the situation using suggested methonds (I am not afraid of hard work) it became clear that the first suggestion - reinstall - was the smarter, easier, and ultimately the best way to resolve it. Done. Thank you - it was very educational. Regards. Thomas Lotterer

Re: Ever rebuilding openpkg-2.1.0

2004-07-24 Thread Michael van Elst
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote: [..] One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this if possible. The following patch therefore will simply select the database entry with the