On Wed, Apr 20, 2005, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Matthias Kurz wrote:
[...]
It would be nice to have an option that removes all old versions of a
package from $prefix/RPM/PKG, when a new build succeeded.
Maybe, but what is 'an old version of a
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:13:38PM +0200, Matthias Kurz wrote:
All packages with the same %name are the same package. All packages
except the one with the newest build date are old packages.
Removing everything from RPM/PKG is not very practical, because one
needs all (binary) packages e.g.
I'm trying to get OpenPKG running on a Solaris 7 machine and can't get
past compiling GCC 3.4.3. I have GCC 3.4.3 installed from
sunfreeware.com and it had no problems compiling binutils, make, and
libiconv. The build process always dies here:
./xgcc -B./ -B/openpkg/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/bin/
Hi,
I have a machine that is running for over a year now with Openpkg. It was
version 2.1. I have numerous packages installed this way and some of them
are installed from source and have modified spec file.
My question is how can I upgrade this server without causing too much
problems? Does
Doug Summers wrote:
I'm trying to get OpenPKG running on a Solaris 7 machine and can't get
past compiling GCC 3.4.3. I have GCC 3.4.3 installed from
sunfreeware.com and it had no problems compiling binutils, make, and
libiconv. The build process always dies here:
./xgcc -B./
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
Doug Summers wrote:
I'm trying to get OpenPKG running on a Solaris 7 machine and can't get
past compiling GCC 3.4.3. I have GCC 3.4.3 installed from
sunfreeware.com and it had no problems compiling binutils, make, and
libiconv. The build process
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
Doug Summers wrote:
I'm trying to get OpenPKG running on a Solaris 7 machine and can't get
past compiling GCC 3.4.3. I have GCC 3.4.3 installed from
sunfreeware.com and it had no problems compiling binutils, make, and
libiconv.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005, Etienne-Hugues Fortin wrote:
I have a machine that is running for over a year now with Openpkg. It was
version 2.1. I have numerous packages installed this way and some of them
are installed from source and have modified spec file.
My question is how can I upgrade
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005, Doug Summers wrote:
[...]
What I can't figure out is why xgcc is using
-B/openpkg/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/bin/ instead of
-B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/bin/.
[...]
Err... well, that's fine. xgcc is the result of pass 1 AFAIK and it
uses
I'm looking through the samba.spec files for the latest releases and
none of them have options for Active Directory support. Is this doable
from these sources or do I need to compile my own from Samba?
Doug
__
The OpenPKG
I looked into this and from what I can tell there is a patch that has to
be applied which has the ADS support. It currently isn't in the openpkg
samba spec file. It would need to be added and rebuilt as part of
current. I have this on my plate at my work, but it is rather low
priority right
David M. Fetter wrote:
I looked into this and from what I can tell there is a patch that has to
be applied which has the ADS support. It currently isn't in the openpkg
samba spec file. It would need to be added and rebuilt as part of
current. I have this on my plate at my work, but it is rather
12 matches
Mail list logo
