Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 20:02:35 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
Yes, the new RPM 5 based bootstrap is already based on GNU Tar 1.21 and
hence built just fine for me last week on a new Debian 5.0 box. This
boostrap will be made available to the public soon, too. Just be patient
a little bit
Ralf,
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 20:02:35 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
Yes, the new RPM 5 based bootstrap is already based on GNU Tar 1.21 and
hence built just fine for me last week on a new Debian 5.0 box. This
boostrap will be made available to the public soon, too. Just be patient
a
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 20:02:35 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
Yes, the new RPM 5 based bootstrap is already based on GNU Tar 1.21 and
hence built just fine for me last week on a new Debian 5.0 box. This
boostrap will be made available to the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 20:02:35 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
Yes, the new RPM 5 based bootstrap is already based on GNU Tar 1.21 and
hence built just fine for me last week on a new Debian 5.0 box. This
boostrap will be made available to the
Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2009 14:27:53 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
I saw that you are deeply involved with rpm5(.org).
On rpm.org and rpm5.org I could not find statements on the relation of
both efforts and why rpm5 would be better than rpm4 in the long run.
Do you know such a document
corners which break under the newer Linux
distro versions.
I've made an experimental patch that disables the build of the internal tar
and copies the system found binary instead:
https://www.intevation.de/roundup/kolab/file1050/kolab-server-gcc43-20090217-ber1.tar
--
Managing Director - Owner
