> OpenCT 0.6.10 doesn't compile on non-linux, so here is a fixed package:
>
> Please test and let me know if it works for you.
Yes, it works. Thanks.
--
Ale
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
Nils Larsch wrote:
the code in apdu.c should do this automatically unless you explicitly
disable this (but perhaps it would be useful if the iso get_response
implementation would respect the reader limits).
that code doesn't look at max_send/recv_size. if the card te
Nils Larsch wrote:
the code in apdu.c should do this automatically unless you explicitly
disable this (but perhaps it would be useful if the iso get_response
implementation would respect the reader limits).
that code doesn't look at max_send/recv_size. if the card tells us
it has 256 bytes, the
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
...
also I wonder:
2048bit signatures with cryptoflex 32k cards in scm readers -
they won't work with ccid + pcscd + opensc either, correct?
i.e. we need to implement get response in several small steps
for cryptoflex?
the code in apdu.c should do this automatically u
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
btw: what exactly is ICCD?
CCID = Chip/Smart Card Interface Devices
I know CCID. but there is also ICCD:
http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs#approved
Smart Card Class
Smart Card CCID version 1.1
Smart Card ICCD version 1.0
If I understand things right, CCI
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Can the SC_APDU_FLAGS_CHAINING be used to do this?
In the piv_general_io routine in card-piv.c I have a large buffer,
and set the resp.le = max_recv_size (256 for the PIV), but
resp.resplen = buffer size, that is greater the max_recv_size.
I don't think so, the code is
Thomas Harning Jr. wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:05 -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
I would hope you would never try to cache a pin especially with
a card like the one you describe:
* If the card was issued such that you had to enter the pin
before every signature, then you are viol
Thomas Harning Jr. wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:05 -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
I would hope you would never try to cache a pin especially with
a card like the one you describe:
* If the card was issued such that you had to enter the pin
before every signature, then you are violat
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:05 -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
> I would hope you would never try to cache a pin especially with
> a card like the one you describe:
>
>* If the card was issued such that you had to enter the pin
> before every signature, then you are violating the policy
>
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Can you give me the extract of the CCID specs that says 271 is the
minimal length?
ok, didn't read the part about extended apdu.
btw: what exactly is ICCD?
also I wonder:
2048bit signatures with cryptoflex 32k cards in scm readers -
they
On 14/11/06, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Can you give me the extract of the CCID specs that says 271 is the
> minimal length?
ok, didn't read the part about extended apdu.
btw: what exactly is ICCD?
CCID = Chip/Smart Card Interface Devices
also I
Hi,
OpenCT 0.6.10 doesn't compile on non-linux, so here is a fixed package:
https://www.opensc-project.org/files/openct/testing/openct-0.6.11-pre1.tar.gz
This new version only fixes a few minor bugs:
New in 0.6.11; 2007-??-??; Andreas Jellinghaus
* add usb reset for non-linux too (dummy code o
Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
I do not think cryptoflex supports T=1. certainly, its ATR does not
suggest that:
ouch. should have checked he atr myself.
Where did you get the idea that it does?
crpytoflex programmers manual v4.5 page xxi
"communication protocols: ISO T=0, T=1"
Andreas
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Can you give me the extract of the CCID specs that says 271 is the
minimal length?
ok, didn't read the part about extended apdu.
btw: what exactly is ICCD?
also I wonder:
2048bit signatures with cryptoflex 32k cards in scm readers -
they won't work with ccid + pcscd + o
On 13/11/06, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had a look at CCID spec 1.10 and - not sure - it seems this is no
longer valid, dwMaxCCIDMessagelength has to be at least 271 bytes
(and max 65544+10 bytes). but that doesn't help, it would be nice
to get the hardware to work.
Can yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
