Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Dennis van Dok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Siddhartha Kasivajhula schreef: Hi guys, I've been trying to compile local versions of openssl, opensc, and engine_pkcs11 as we discussed earlier. After I compile openssl, I try to [...] ./configure --help tells me that I can use:

[opensc-devel] Cross-compiling engine_pkcs11 for Darwin PowerPC

2007-08-10 Thread Dennis van Dok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The engine_pkcs11 software (version 0.1.3) compiles and builds nicely on my Intel MacBook. Now I want to generate a 'universal binary', which means that I have to pass the flag '-arch ppc' to gcc to generate PowerPC binaries. I'm trying to do

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any other comment? No... :) There are just too many weird things in configure... I am afraid to touch... Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. ___ opensc-devel mailing list

Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
engine_pkcs11 has a --with-openssl option for configure, please use it with the proper path. also set PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the bin and lib directories. in general also set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to include the .pc file (not needed for engine_pkcs11 and openssl I think as we have a special logic

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 17:44:00 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Hmmm nl use ltdl -#AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS(ltdl) +AC_CHECK_LIB([ltdl],lt_dlopen) Solves this issue. Anyone know why the AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS was used and not AC_CHECK_LIB? would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 08:46:53 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: After another quick look... Some thoughts... 1. Rename configure.in into configure.ac fine with me. I think Antti was against it or something. but I don't remember the details, and whatever old plattform had problems with the rename is

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 09:27:02 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: 3. Why configure has AM_MAINTAINER_MODE? It is best to go without. I do not agree. AM_MAINTAINER_MODE will prevent make to try to rebuild Makefile.in if it detects Makefile.am is more recent. end-users should not have to have

Re: [opensc-devel] CardOs 4.3b what I wrong?

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 10:13:38 mkarmowski wrote: Before a moment i got new card, from oryginal package. I'm using cardos-info: is this a card from siemens or from some distributor. it is half initialized, i.e. with the structures, but you can create additional keys / certs / ... that way

Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: sorry, we need to fix the help text. the base directory (i.e. without bin/ and lib/, it will attach those as needed). Andreas, I don't think this is needed. the --with-openssl=PATH switch is generally understood as the base installation directory to openssl. It

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or similar (or adjust the autoconf makefiles - I prefer not setting LIBS so we can add -lltdl only where needed and not on a global scale). Attached. also we need to check

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: 2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4? The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at your system... I don't want to force people into installing libassuan-dev. they would if we