Le lundi 20 décembre 2010 à 07:23 +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus a écrit :
> The traditional opensc way for windows however is this:
> 1.) opensc used to access the card from PKCS#11 applications.
> 2.) a PKCS-CSP such as the ID-Ally CSP, CSP#11 or PKCSCP - all these
> packages implement a CSP, but
Dear all,
http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2009-February/011905.html
This seems very promising. Is there any reason why not to commit this
code to OpenSC repository directly?
> Nevertheless, it would be nice if somebody reanimated one of the
> PKCS#11 related CSP-s.
+1. Thi
the biggest argument of course is: why change a working system?
also, it might affect every single user, if we change the email
address of the list, so that alone is a very good reason to not
do that.
> Hm? Is anyone using email addresses @opensc-project.org ?
19 emails to opensc-de...@opensc-pro
Martin Paljak wrote:
> >> I would appreciate if we could change the canonical email address of
> >> the list to be *without* the lists. name. Possible?
> >
> > but it is much easier to direkt all emails to @lists.opensc-project.org
> > to mailman.
Is this the only argument?
> > the alternative
Hi everyone,
I'm really sorry and it is frustrating, but things went
wrong here and I won't be able to make it to fosdem this
year. Still I hope many of you can make it and will have
a good time.
With best regards, Andreas
p.s. And a happy new year to all of you!
On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Am Montag 03 Januar 2011, um 23:59:47 schrieb Peter Stuge:
>>> opensc-devel mailing list
>>> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
>>> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>>
>> I would appreciate if we could change
Am Montag 03 Januar 2011, um 23:59:47 schrieb Peter Stuge:
> > opensc-devel mailing list
> > opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> > http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>
> I would appreciate if we could change the canonical email address of
> the list to be *without* the
Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0100, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a
écrit :
> So I contacted the original
> author and proposed him a free Feitian PKI.
OK. The author replied and we will work together for a better OpenSC
support.
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.
Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 à 16:07 +0100, Peter Stuge a écrit :
> This seems to only be for use with eid. Do you mean that you imported
> your eid onto the feitian card?
From their homepage, I understand that any card with mini-driver should
be supported. But it does not seem to work. So I contacte
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> Did any succeed in using eID authenticate under Windows 7 with the
> Feitian PKI card: https://sourceforge.net/projects/eidauthenticate/
This seems to only be for use with eid. Do you mean that you imported
your eid onto the feitian card?
//Peter
__
[ ... ]
> Going for log4c or similar would IMHO be a total overkill,
> as is implementing anything internal that is designed for RFU.
> Focus should be on things related to smart cards, not logging :)
> If you want debug logging, too much is better than too little
> (you can always use grep). Und
Dear Friends,
Did any succeed in using eID authenticate under Windows 7 with the
Feitian PKI card: https://sourceforge.net/projects/eidauthenticate/
I am trying without success.
The mini-driver is installed.
Any idea?
Kind regards,
Jean-Michel
___
o
On Jan 4, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Brian Thomas wrote:
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
> 9.0\VC\Bin
> \cl.EXE"' : return code '0xc135'
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowssdk/thread/97ebc510-25f2-4747-8d4f-185038d805d4/
Maybe this helps? Wha
OK,
I tried compiling under Windows using the steps outlined in:
http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/CompilingInstalling
I am receiving the following error output:
C:\Documents and Settings\thomas.b\Desktop\opensc-0.12.0>nmake /f
Makefile.mak
Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance
Hello,
On Jan 4, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> I just discovered the pGina project:
> http://www.gooze.eu/links/pgina-open-source-authentication-system
If you post links, please paste the original link (which, by the way, is 44
characters shorter) instead of blog links.
> Did any
Jean-Michel Pouré wrote:
> I just discovered the pGina project:
> http://www.gooze.eu/links/pgina-open-source-authentication-system
http://www.pgina.org/index.php/Main_Page
Didn't know they had a 2.x version out. Nice!
> I would like to use:
> * OpenSC under Windows.
> * pGina authentication sy
Dear friends,
I just discovered the pGina project:
http://www.gooze.eu/links/pgina-open-source-authentication-system
Did any of you was able to use pGina with a PKCS#15 smartcard,
preferably with OpenSC?
I would like to use:
* OpenSC under Windows.
* pGina authentication system.
* FreeRadius ser
On 04.01.2011 11:35, Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>> My humble intention is to have the possibility to reduce the 'header' of the
>> every debug message call in the source code,
>> that actually, for my personal taste, is too large.
> Same here. I would
Hello,
On Jan 4, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> There has been more then one wide discussion about log system in OpenSC ,
> and I would not like to start the new one.
Agreed.
> My humble intention is to have the possibility to reduce the 'header' of the
> every debug message call in
Hello,
This has been discussed before, see the thread from March 2010 [1] and possibly
earlier threads.
On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Juan Antonio Martinez wrote:
> El lun, 03-01-2011 a las 13:01 +0100, Viktor TARASOV escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to introduce the following short form to in
On 04.01.2011 10:58, Juan Antonio Martinez wrote:
> El lun, 03-01-2011 a las 13:01 +0100, Viktor TARASOV escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I propose to introduce the following short form to insert debug messages of
>> the 'normal' level.
>> Any objections?
> Fine, but thinks that we need a way to get finer d
On 04.01.2011 11:02, Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:19 AM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 5038
>> Author: vtarasov
>> Date: 2011-01-04 09:19:09 + (Tue, 04 Jan 2011)
>>
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> AuthentIC: use short form to insert 'normal' debug me
On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:19 AM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
> Revision: 5038
> Author: vtarasov
> Date: 2011-01-04 09:19:09 + (Tue, 04 Jan 2011)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> AuthentIC: use short form to insert 'normal' debug messages
A short comment:
Maybe a simple sc_log wo
El lun, 03-01-2011 a las 13:01 +0100, Viktor TARASOV escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to introduce the following short form to insert debug messages of
> the 'normal' level.
> Any objections?
Fine, but thinks that we need a way to get finer debug tuning:
Not sure... perhaps it's time for introduct
Hi,
I would like to implement the multi-application support,
roughly in the same manner as it's actually done in the IAS/ECC branch.
Any objections ?
Kind wishes,
Viktor.
--
Viktor Tarasov
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-pr
Hello,
On Jan 3, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Johannes Becker wrote:
> Just a reminder, that the "login required" bug concerning
> TCOS2 cards is not fixed yet.
>
> The patch
> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/ticket/256
> does not add the "login required" flag.
>
> Can I be of any help tracing down
26 matches
Mail list logo
