Il 05/09/2012 13:29, helpcrypto helpcrypto ha scritto:
> The most advanced i have seen here so far is 2048 :P
I bought (but haven't yet had time to experiment with) Cryptomate64:
http://www.acs.com.hk/index.php?pid=product&prod_sections=0&id=CRYPTOMATE64
See my message dated 2012/05/23.
Doesn't
> Do you want my Humble or Honest opinion ? :)
None. Hacker one :P
> It shall depend on the use case. I doubt that there will ever be a
> "single, universal keychain", but many. VPN authentication with device
> based (TMP etc) keys which get auto-provisioned and a "movable"
> identity in the form
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:29 PM, helpcrypto helpcrypto
wrote:
>> And IMHO device-attached containers (TPM, Intel etc) are totally
>> different from transportable key-containers (like smart cards or USB
>> tokens)
>
> So, IYHO, whats the better option?
Do you want my Humble or Honest opinion ? :)
On 2012-09-05 13:29, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
>> Huh, I'd guess (hope) nobody would be deploying *RSA* below 2048 bits
>> (smart cards doing 3k and 4k are also slowly emerging) and elliptic
>> curves are already becoming a viable option (in commodity software) as
>> well..
>
> The most advance
Credential Cloning. Was: Intel's Virtual
Smart Card
> Huh, I'd guess (hope) nobody would be deploying *RSA* below 2048 bits
> (smart cards doing 3k and 4k are also slowly emerging) and elliptic
> curves are already becoming a viable option (in commodity software) as
> well..
Th
> Huh, I'd guess (hope) nobody would be deploying *RSA* below 2048 bits
> (smart cards doing 3k and 4k are also slowly emerging) and elliptic
> curves are already becoming a viable option (in commodity software) as
> well..
The most advanced i have seen here so far is 2048 :P
> There's also a bun
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM, helpcrypto helpcrypto
wrote:
> Also, considering how governments are involved in technology, probably
> many countries will adopt them, like eID, DNIe, and so in the next
> years.
> In 1024bit mode, of course.
Huh, I'd guess (hope) nobody would be deploying *RSA*
Just to sum up:
-TPM (fail?)
-Intel IPT (seem to be a draft and only for intel?)
-SC (Welcome 1970)
-Virtual/Cloud wallets (obscure?)
-A mobile device to replace sc (standard?)
IMHO, SC are old enough/well known to continue existing for quite
long, until someone brings a new/better/big idea.
Also
Martin Paljak wrote:
> IIRC it was apple who wants to make a phone self-register. Meaning
> there are no parts to add or remove from the phone and you pair it to
> your operator "online". The question IMHO is how much do telcos want
> to give up the "freedom" of controlling access to their networks
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Anders Rundgren
wrote:
> Who would buy a $100 solution if they can get one for free?
> I don't think even the SIM will survive.
IIRC it was apple who wants to make a phone self-register. Meaning
there are no parts to add or remove from the phone and you pair it t
On 2012-08-19 18:55, NdK wrote:
> Il 19/08/2012 15:50, Anders Rundgren ha scritto:
>
>> Everything you write is fine and probably correct as well.
>> The only "fly in the soup" is that *it is not happening*.
> I think it will be just like the TPM: when enough people will realize
> what it is, it w
Il 19/08/2012 15:50, Anders Rundgren ha scritto:
> Everything you write is fine and probably correct as well.
> The only "fly in the soup" is that *it is not happening*.
I think it will be just like the TPM: when enough people will realize
what it is, it won't get accepted by the public.
It's not
Diego,
Everything you write is fine and probably correct as well.
The only "fly in the soup" is that *it is not happening*.
The smart card community has failed creating a cheap a readily
available token that can be provisioned on-line while for example
iPhone and Android already ships with built-
Il 19/08/2012 10:14, Anders Rundgren ha scritto:
> Virtual smart cards have unlimited capacity and doesn't occupy space in
> your pocket either.
Then an USB token paired with some form of "unsecure" storage and have
RSA capabilities and a button or a small keypad (display w/
touchscreen?) to enter
On 2012-08-17 22:32, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
>> It also means that the "card" middleware will be a part of the OS.
>
> This will boost the smartcard technology to a wider public, which are
> good news. It is essential to have the smartcard or token in the hand /
> in the pocket. You compu
15 matches
Mail list logo
