On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> > What I suggest is that OpenSC should be hosted on GIThub with write
> > access to core developers (at least 5/6 people).
>
> Insisting on changing some hosting situation that has been set up is
> nothing b
> Insisting on changing some hosting situation that has been set up is
> nothing but obnoxious protesting and spitting on the already
> established hosting.
Peter, do you mean that moving OpenSC to GIThub and opening
administration to a group of core developers would be "obnoxious" and
"spitting"
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> What I suggest is that OpenSC should be hosted on GIThub with write
> access to core developers (at least 5/6 people).
Insisting on changing some hosting situation that has been set up is
nothing but obnoxious protesting and spitting on the already
established ho
Le dimanche 27 mai 2012 à 22:26 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> >> I, personally, for (3), providing a great service and
> responsiveness
> >> while perfecting the code as 2nd priority (exception are
> interfaces).
> >> I think this approach was taken at opensc in the past.
My definition for quali
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Peter, quality is not absolute term.
>
> In computing I actually think it is; a high quality program does
> exactly what it is supposed to do and never anything else.
>
> Computers are very simple machines, so it is feasi
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Peter, quality is not absolute term.
In computing I actually think it is; a high quality program does
exactly what it is supposed to do and never anything else.
Computers are very simple machines, so it is feasible for humans to
create such programs.
> best algorithm
> "go
