On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote:
> Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: > > What I suggest is that OpenSC should be hosted on GIThub with write > > access to core developers (at least 5/6 people). > > Insisting on changing some hosting situation that has been set up is > nothing but obnoxious protesting and spitting on the already > established hosting. > Peter, probably it useless, but may I bring once more to your attention the fact that github is set into the center for Development Policy by Martin himself. Look onto the diagram in https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/DevelopmentPolicy . Centering development around github.com brings no benefits whatsoever > over opensc-project.org. The latter allows the project to do nice > integration and customization of all tools. Github not so much. > What integration do you mean? On opensc-project.org the tarball, MSI and DMG are built. No RPMs, DEB, no automated tests, ... 'Customization of all tools' -- what tools do you mean ? Effectively, it would be nice to build and publish Linux packages, connect automated tests, include other OpenSC sub-projects, ... But who will do all this on opensc-project.org? Martin have no time, no one else can/allowed to do something. Beside the necessity of the perfect commits, can you propose something else? Kind regards, Viktor. > //Peter > _______________________________________________ > opensc-devel mailing list > opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org > http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel >
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
