Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Siddhartha Kasivajhula wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've been trying to compile local versions of openssl, opensc, and > engine_pkcs11 as we discussed earlier. After I compile openssl, I try to > compile engine_pkcs11 using that version of openssl, but I can't get > that to work correctly. If I incl

Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Dennis van Dok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Siddhartha Kasivajhula schreef: > Hi guys, > > I've been trying to compile local versions of openssl, opensc, and > engine_pkcs11 as we discussed earlier. After I compile openssl, I try to [...] > > ./configure --help tells me that I can use: > --w

[opensc-devel] Cross-compiling engine_pkcs11 for Darwin PowerPC

2007-08-10 Thread Dennis van Dok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The engine_pkcs11 software (version 0.1.3) compiles and builds nicely on my Intel MacBook. Now I want to generate a 'universal binary', which means that I have to pass the flag '-arch ppc' to gcc to generate PowerPC binaries. I'm trying to do this

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any other comment? No... :) There are just too many weird things in configure... I am afraid to touch... Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-projec

Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
engine_pkcs11 has a --with-openssl option for configure, please use it with the proper path. also set PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the bin and lib directories. in general also set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to include the .pc file (not needed for engine_pkcs11 and openssl I think as we have a special logic b

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 17:44:00 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hmmm > nl use ltdl > -#AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS(ltdl) > +AC_CHECK_LIB([ltdl],lt_dlopen) > > Solves this issue. > Anyone know why the AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS was used and not AC_CHECK_LIB? would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL o

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
> > Anyone know why the AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS was used and not AC_CHECK_LIB? > > I guess it was just ignorance. It was not a bug (for me) before automake > 1.10. AC_LIB_LINKSFLAGS was suggested somewhere and thus I used it. but if it causes problems now, I'm fine with replacing it. but we need to adjus

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 08:46:53 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > After another quick look... > Some thoughts... > > 1. Rename configure.in into configure.ac fine with me. I think Antti was against it or something. but I don't remember the details, and whatever old plattform had problems with the rename

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 09:27:02 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > 3. Why configure has AM_MAINTAINER_MODE? It is best to go without. > > I do not agree. AM_MAINTAINER_MODE will prevent make to try to rebuild > Makefile.in if it detects Makefile.am is more recent. > "end-users" should not have to have

Re: [opensc-devel] CardOs 4.3b what I wrong?

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 10:13:38 mkarmowski wrote: > Before a moment i got new card, from oryginal package. I'm using > cardos-info: > is this a card from siemens or from some distributor. it is half initialized, i.e. with the structures, but you can create additional keys / certs / ... that w

Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: sorry, we need to fix the help text. the base directory (i.e. without bin/ and lib/, it will attach those as needed). Andreas, I don't think this is needed. the --with-openssl=PATH switch is generally understood as the base installation directory to openssl. It shou

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or similar > (or adjust the autoconf makefiles - I prefer not setting LIBS so we can > add -lltdl only where needed and not on a global scale). Attached. > also we need to > c

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > 2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4? > > The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at > > your system... > > I don't want to force people into installing libassuan-dev. they would if

Re: [opensc-devel] engine-pkcs11 incompatible version?

2007-08-10 Thread Siddhartha Kasivajhula
On 8/10/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > engine_pkcs11 has a --with-openssl option for configure, please use it > with > the proper path. also set PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the bin and lib > directories. in general also set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to include the .pc file > (not need

Re: [opensc-devel] Cross-compiling engine_pkcs11 for Darwin PowerPC

2007-08-10 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:49:29PM +0200, Dennis van Dok wrote: > I'm currently pulling my hair out trying to figure out what I can > do to make this work in a fashion that won't disgrace the build > system. One way is a simple wrapper for gcc maybe. //Peter _

Re: [opensc-devel] Cross-compiling engine_pkcs11 for Darwin PowerPC

2007-08-10 Thread Jean-Pierre Szikora
Dennis van Dok wrote: > Hi, > > The engine_pkcs11 software (version 0.1.3) compiles and builds nicely on > my Intel MacBook. Now I want to generate a 'universal binary', which > means that I have to pass the flag '-arch ppc' to gcc to generate > PowerPC binaries. I'm trying to do this by setting C