Hello,
Could we discuss the introduction talk at FOSDEM.
These last two months, I did two presentations at Debian day and JM2L.
Based on these presentations, it seems that we could:
* Start with a 15 minutes slides presenting the various crypto
frameworks at OS level + application level. The la
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> the biggest argument of course is: why change a working system?
But it isn't working, that's the point. It's ambiguous and
unneccessary to have two addresses for the list and every now and
then there are duplicate messages because a message ends up being
sent to both a
On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:22 PM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
> Revision: 5046
> Author: vtarasov
> Date: 2011-01-05 15:22:12 + (Wed, 05 Jan 2011)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> pkcs15-tool: new 'bind-to-aid' argument ...
Why not --aid ?
--
@MartinPaljak.net
+3725156495
___
On 05.01.2011 17:22, Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:22 PM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 5046
>> Author: vtarasov
>> Date: 2011-01-05 15:22:12 + (Wed, 05 Jan 2011)
>>
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> pkcs15-tool: new 'bind-to-aid' argument ...
> Why not
Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2011, um 13:24:43 schrieb Peter Stuge:
> Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > the biggest argument of course is: why change a working system?
>
> But it isn't working, that's the point. It's ambiguous and
> unneccessary to have two addresses for the list and every now and
> then th
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > But it isn't working, that's the point. It's ambiguous and
> > unneccessary to have two addresses for the list and every now and
> > then there are duplicate messages
>
> so you want a postfix config change with smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> gaining an check_recipie
opensc-devel-requ...@lists.opensc-project.org skrev:
>Send opensc-devel mailing list submissions to
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>or, via email, send
Hello,
On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> On 05.01.2011 17:22, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:22 PM, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
>>> Log Message:
>>> ---
>>> pkcs15-tool: new 'bind-to-aid' argument ...
>> Why not --aid ?
>
> Mainly because of pkcs15-
On 1/5/2011 1:17 AM, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2009-February/011905.html
>
> This seems very promising. Is there any reason why not to commit this
> code to OpenSC repository directly?
The note is almost 2 years old, and
