PSARC/2009/036 Authorisation based login control: pam_auths

2009-02-06 Thread Darren J Moffat
I've updated the spec to reflect the latest revisions and extended the timer until 11th Feb 2009. I don't believe there are any technical issues left to be resolved though. spec-v3.txt in the case dir is the latest (spec.txt is a link to it). -- Darren J Moffat

[Fwd: xsdlib - Sun Java SML routines [LSARC/2009/046 FastTrack timeout 02/03/2009]]

2009-02-06 Thread Vivek Titarmare
, Jim -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xsdlib.3 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 715 bytes Desc: not available URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090206/a067a50d/attachment.obj -- next part

GNU Developer Collection [LSARC/2008/776 FastTrack timeout 01/07/2009]

2009-02-06 Thread George Vasick
: onepager.txt URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090206/d4d6e583/attachment.txt -- next part -- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: manifest432.txt URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc

GNU Developer Collection [LSARC/2008/776 FastTrack timeout 01/07/2009]

2009-02-06 Thread James Carlson
George Vasick writes: Thanks for your many comments and helpful feedback. Attached, please find a revised proposal. It contains major changes to the previous proposal as follows: This looks pretty nice except for one bit that seems a little unfortunate: usr/bin/cpp=./cpp-4.3.2 That's an

PSARC 2009/069 802.1Q tag mode link property

2009-02-06 Thread Sebastien Roy
802.1Q tag mode link property Release binding: Patch Interface Stability: Committed Related Case: PSARC 2006/358 VLAN Observability Enhancement Summary --- This case introduces a GLDv3 link property named tagmode to control the conditions in which the kernel inserts VLAN tags in

PSARC 2009/069 802.1Q tag mode link property

2009-02-06 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:32 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote: 802.1Q tag mode link property I forgot to mention that I'm sponsoring this case for myself, and it times out on February 13th. -Seb

PSARC 2009/069 802.1Q tag mode link property

2009-02-06 Thread James Carlson
Sebastien Roy writes: On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:32 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote: 802.1Q tag mode link property I forgot to mention that I'm sponsoring this case for myself, and it times out on February 13th. +1 -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking james.d.carlson at sun.com

PSARC 2009/069 802.1Q tag mode link property

2009-02-06 Thread Garrett D'Amore
+1. Thanks for the detailed write up. (And, btw, -1 to the applications that assume QoS is always present, and -1 to the switch vendors that still haven't got tagged packet processing in their products. :-) -- Garrett Sebastien Roy wrote: 802.1Q tag mode link property Release

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread James Carlson
The project team has asked that the ARC members review new materials in order to determine whether a formal commitment review is necessary. I've advised them to schedule a regular review, but I've also agreed to help them with this request, so I ask that all members expecting to vote on this case

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread Christof Pintaske
Garrett D'Amore wrote: I'm on sabbatical, so maybe all of this doesn't count. Nonetheless, I'm unhappy that they still don't seem to have addressed a few (IMO) key issues. a) Disconnect between software installed on the system, and documentation presented. (I.e. examples can come

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Christof Pintaske wrote: Garrett D'Amore wrote: I'm on sabbatical, so maybe all of this doesn't count. Nonetheless, I'm unhappy that they still don't seem to have addressed a few (IMO) key issues. a) Disconnect between software installed on the system, and documentation presented.

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread Christof Pintaske
Garrett D'Amore wrote: Christof Pintaske wrote: Garrett D'Amore wrote: I'm on sabbatical, so maybe all of this doesn't count. Nonetheless, I'm unhappy that they still don't seem to have addressed a few (IMO) key issues. a) Disconnect between software installed on the system, and

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Christof Pintaske wrote: Garrett D'Amore wrote: Christof Pintaske wrote: Garrett D'Amore wrote: I'm on sabbatical, so maybe all of this doesn't count. Nonetheless, I'm unhappy that they still don't seem to have addressed a few (IMO) key issues. a) Disconnect between software

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread Christof Pintaske
Garrett D'Amore wrote: if you click of one of the search results in command assistant then a browser window will open and bring you to the corresponding document. It's the same thing as with google. You see all the results and then you click on the ones where you are interested in. And

Member reply requested for 2008/772 Command Assistant

2009-02-06 Thread Garrett D'Amore
I don't think continuing this conversation is helpful. (I do have responses to your comments if you really want to hear them, but if we continue we should do so offline.) I'm on sabbatical anyway, so I'll abstain from voting. -- Garrett Christof Pintaske wrote: Garrett D'Amore wrote: