Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I've posted a draft opinion filename opinion-draft.txt (and also .ms)
in the case directory for review. Its attached to this message as
well. Thanks.
[snip]
3. Interfaces
The project exports the following
Hi all,
just to let you know - I am (with colleague) in process to test freeipmi
services with ipmitool services (ipmievd). I should have results next week.
Regards,
Michal
On 04/28/09 02:16, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
Roland Mainz writes:
Erm... my concern is that Commited means _very_ stable and should be
used very carefully. Changing Commited interfaces is AFAIK non-trivial
and that's why I was suggesting to use Uncommitted for now until we
have at least the proof that more than one implementation
Updated materials are in the case directory. This case was approved at
LSARC this week.
-- mark
Hi John,
Yes, pywbem would be executed from command line.
Regards,
~Vivek R. Titarmare
-Original Message-
From: John.Fischer at Sun.COM [mailto:john.fisc...@sun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:27 PM
To: Vivek Titarmare
Cc: LSARC-ext at sun.com
Subject: Re: pywbem Ver 0.7
Hi Alan,
--cut ---
Is the /usr location correct and the others just missed in updating?
[VIVEK]: yes the /usr location is correct. I had missed the question in FOSS
check list. I have corrected the answer to the question in FOSS chk list. Also,
I have changed the manpage from tipc.1 to tipc.3
Bharath,
Thanks for the answers. The licensing question is still not quite
answered. The developer documents found at:
https://wiseman.dev.java.net/files/documents/3436/70623/file_70623.dat/Wiseman%20Server%20Developer%27s%20Guide.pdf
States:
Installing Wiseman
Wiseman is
Bharath,
Actually, I just went back and looked at the wiseman website:
https://wiseman.dev.java.net/index.html
and noticed the following:
The wiseman project is an implementation of the WS-Management
specification for the Java SE platform. The project scope
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090430/672dd3d0/attachment.txt
This case was approved at today's meeting.
-Cecilia
Hi John,
Please see replies inline.
John Fischer wrote:
Bharath,
Doesn't Wiseman import JAX-WS?
Wiseman uses libraries that are exported from JAXB and SAAJ. (
https://wiseman.dev.java.net/quick_start.html ) and it is mentioned in
the imported interfaces
The developer documents state
Vivek,
pywbem should be installed into /usr/bin.
Thanks,
John
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
Hi John,
Yes, pywbem would be executed from command line.
Regards,
~Vivek R. Titarmare
-Original Message-
From: John.Fischer at Sun.COM [mailto:John.Fischer at Sun.COM]
Sent:
Vivek,
Also what is the interface classification for pyweb? Will it be
Volatile, Uncommitted or Committed?
Thanks,
John
John Fischer wrote:
Vivek,
pywbem should be installed into /usr/bin.
Thanks,
John
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
Hi John,
Yes, pywbem would be executed from
Hi John,
All the interface classifications for pywbem are uncommitted.
And yes, I have changed in the Build files. I missed this to updated in the
Fasttrack and FOSS check list.
I will update and resend it across to you.
Thanks,
~Vivek R. Titarmare
-Original Message-
From:
/20090430/d04a2e8a/attachment.txt
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: FastTrack_pywbem.txt
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090430/d04a2e8a/attachment-0001.txt
-- next part
Vivek,
Thanks for updating the materials. The proposal still does not
state the classification for the pyweb script itself. Also the
document still states that the pyweb script will be installed
into /usr/lib/pyweb instead of /usr/bin.
Thanks,
John
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
Hi John,
Pl.
was scrubbed...
Name: FOSS_pywbem.txt
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090430/b23ce160/attachment.txt
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: FastTrack_pywbem.txt
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org
Vivek,
No problem. However, I am still missing something here. The script
is called pyweb and it installs into /usr/bin/ or the directory
/usr/bin/pyweb/ ?
Also do you have a package map?
Thanks,
John
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
Oops, soory. I corrected the ARC material and pl. find attached
Hey Vivek,
Looking at some of the documentation, it looks like
you import pywbem when running python.
http://pywbem.sourceforge.net/docs/tutorial.shtml:
To test that PyWBEM is sucessfully installed, start up a Python
interpreter and try to import the pywbem module.
$ python
Python
: pcitool.manpage
URL:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090430/e68613e7/attachment.ksh
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:32:38 -0400
From: James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com
Subject: Re: PSARC 2009/228 ls enhancements (draft opinion)
Message-ID: 18936.47462.564131.634760 at gargle.gargle.HOWL
Danek Duvall writes:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:51:32AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:59:08AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
The inception materials are now available:
I've added two files to inception.materials/man:
- cpg.1
A manpage for a new command.
- pcred-diffs
Diffs to pcred(1).
The Overview.txt file refers to pcred changes but not
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Don Cragun dcragun at sonic.net wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:32:38 -0400
From: James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com
Subject: Re: PSARC 2009/228 ls enhancements (draft opinion)
Message-ID: 18936.47462.564131.634760 at gargle.gargle.HOWL
Danek Duvall
Don Cragun writes:
The reason I asked to discuss ls during yesterday's meeting is that the
materials provided in the initial mail (before the man page was added to
the case directory) contained the following:
--color[=WHEN], --colour[=WHEN]
which shows WHEN as an optional
[Repaired subject line and cc-list. Without the case number in the
subject line and psarc-ext in the cc-list, your comments will not be
recorded with your case.]
Jason King writes:
mandatory arguments, --option=VALUE or --option VALUE is acceptable,
thus ls --color=auto or ls --color, but not
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:56 PM, James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com
wrote:
Don Cragun writes:
The reason I asked to discuss ls during yesterday's meeting is that the
materials provided in the initial mail (before the man page was added to
the case directory) contained the following:
?
Jason King writes:
After lots of reading, rereading, parsing, and reparsing, I believe
using getopt_long(3c) to process the arguments, with '+' being the
first character of the option string, gives the desired behavior
(without breaking any standards).
Yep; I think you're on the right path.
[ Didn't make it into the case mail log. Trying again. ]
This case was approved at Wednesday's meeting.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:16 PM, James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com
wrote:
Jason King writes:
After lots of reading, rereading, parsing, and reparsing, I believe
using getopt_long(3c) to process the arguments, with '+' being the
first character of the option string, gives the desired
Jason King wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:16 PM, James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com
wrote:
Jason King writes:
After lots of reading, rereading, parsing, and reparsing, I believe
using getopt_long(3c) to process the arguments, with '+' being the
first character of the option string,
30 matches
Mail list logo
