Gary Winiger wrote:
>> Amendment 1:
>>
>> The pconsole-bin binary requires elevated privilege to be useful. We
>> request to move the binary from the originally stated /usr/bin to
>> /usr/sbin, in line with where other binaries requiring privilege
>> usually exist.
>>
>> Amendment 2:
>>
>> A new e
Gary Winiger wrote:
>> Amendment 1:
>>
>> The pconsole-bin binary requires elevated privilege to be useful. We
>> request to move the binary from the originally stated /usr/bin to
>> /usr/sbin, in line with where other binaries requiring privilege
>> usually exist.
>>
>> Amendment 2:
>>
>> A new e
Okay, just to formally make sure it is recorded in an obvious manner:
this case is approved.
-- Garrett
I am sponsoring this case on behalf of Vuong Nguyen. The case
introduces four new FMA ereports for the Intel 5100 chipset. This case
seeks patch binding for a Solaris 10 Update Release. Timeout is
05/08/2009.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 200
> Amendment 1:
>
> The pconsole-bin binary requires elevated privilege to be useful. We
> request to move the binary from the originally stated /usr/bin to
> /usr/sbin, in line with where other binaries requiring privilege
> usually exist.
>
> Amendment 2:
>
> A new execution profile and attrib
Gary Winiger wrote:
>>> I've missed seeing the specification that pcitool will be
>>> added to Maintenane and Repair and with what attributes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
See
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/
for how to add to the RBAC
> From gww at eng.sun.com Fri May 1 11:31:26 2009
> Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Gary Winiger
> To: gww at sac.sfbay.sun.com, Erwin.Tsaur at sun.com
> Subject: Re: PSARC 2009/215 PCITool Public Interrupts
> Cc: Alan.Slivensky at sun.com, PSARC-ext at sun.com, pci-core at su
> > I've missed seeing the specification that pcitool will be
> > added to Maintenane and Repair and with what attributes.
> >
> >
> >> See
> >> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/bestpractices/rbac-profiles/
> >> for how to add to the RBAC databases.
> >>
> >
> >
On Fri, May 1, 2009 06:07, James Carlson wrote:
> Don Cragun writes:
>> I see that now. As you have probably noticed, I'm getting the ARC mail
>> in digest form. The digest that said this case had been approved didn't
>> hit my inbox until after the PSARC meeting Wednesday. When I raised the
>
>
Should this note just be eliminated, or is there some hard
> requirement for euid==ruid==0 which cannot be met otherwise.
>
That's right, something left over from the old PSARC case, which I
removed now. Updated manpage included
> Gary..
>
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: pcitool.manpage
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090501/90269bda/attachment.ksh>
Glenn Fowler writes:
> there are no posix standards for long options
> so it should not be a problem for a long option
> with no corresponding short flag to have an optional option value,
> of course assuming that the name=value form would be required to
> disambuguate when the option value is pre
> After discussing with Gary Winiger I am amending the PSARC case to
> include more details about security.
I'm probably being overly picky here. In my offline discussions
there seemed to be confusion about the (architectural) details.
Including that I'm not the only one
there are no posix standards for long options
so it should not be a problem for a long option
with no corresponding short flag to have an optional option value,
of course assuming that the name=value form would be required to
disambuguate when the option value is present
side note -- the ast opt
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/announcements/
OpenSolaris ARC Agenda
TELECONFERENCE NUMBERS:
(866)545-5223 (Within US)
(215) 446-3661 (International)
ACCESS CODE 939-55-86
Times are US/Pacific Timezone
ARC meetings are recorded.
TUESDAY May 5, 2009
10:0
Hi John,
> Hence my question about wiseman requiring JAX-WS. So one part of the
> website states that only JAXB and SAAJ are required (your link). The
> front page of the website states that JAX-WS is also required. So
> which is it? This is part of the problem with relying on external
> websi
Hi John,
>
>
> How is the project team fulfilling this requirement? Is it an implied
> agreement? Is it an explicit agreement? For exmple, the first time
> StarOffice is used the users sees a license and must agree to it. Other
> projects simply have the license included in the packaging becaus
Don Cragun writes:
> My reading of the getopt_long() description is that if the element of
> the getopt_long() struct option array pointed to by the longopts
> parameter has name set to "color" and has has_arg set to
> optional_argument (as defined in ), getopt_long() should
> recognize either of
Don Cragun writes:
> I see that now. As you have probably noticed, I'm getting the ARC mail
> in digest form. The digest that said this case had been approved didn't
> hit my inbox until after the PSARC meeting Wednesday. When I raised the
I believe you were still on the line when we derailed a
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Don Cragun wrote:
> Jason King wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:16 PM, James Carlson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jason King writes:
After lots of reading, rereading, parsing, and reparsing, I believe
using getopt_long(3c) to process the arguments, with
19 matches
Mail list logo
