On 8/15/05, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> > I don't know much about build environments in the RPM world, but don't
> > development teams generally base their shared build environments on the
> > rpmbuild tool and repositories of RPM spec files?
>
> I would imagine they share
Heya,
> I don't know much about build environments in the RPM world, but don't
> development teams generally base their shared build environments on the
> rpmbuild tool and repositories of RPM spec files?
I would imagine they share their stuff on just the SRPMs [1] - since
that by their nature co
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Magnus Forsberg wrote:
> Thinking about OpenSolaris. It has no use of these packaging systems
> that aim of multi-platform-OS-binary level modularity compability PMSs.
>
> From my point of view what's needed in OpenSolaris is something that is
> focused on the end user, and the
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Chris Ricker wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > I tend to think of these things separately. To me,
> > a "PMS" is _only_ a binary package management, auto-update system...
>
> I think it's perhaps more clear, particularly if you're wanting to com
For those who interested in development on DRI project this link could
be interested:
http://bolthole.com/solaris/drivers/DRI.html
Dima
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:16 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > Serge wrote:
> > > - sorry for the du
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
do we have DRI/3D-related mailing list somewhere, so we could
ask/discuss/contribute to it?
I'm not aware of any external lists or webpages for the Solaris DRI
project yet. (It's being worked on by one of the kernel teams, not
my group, so I do
Al Hopper wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
We have four community proposals on this list now:
* Solaris x86 drivers
* Chinese users
* Approachability
* Laptops
I'm clear on the Approachability proposal, the feedback was good, so
we're opening it. I'm not as clear on t
Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
do we have DRI/3D-related mailing list somewhere, so we could
ask/discuss/contribute to it?
I'm not aware of any external lists or webpages for the Solaris DRI
project yet. (It's being worked on by one of the kernel teams, not
my group, so I don't know all the details.)
Hello,
A silly question, does anyone have any photographs of an old SPARC or m68k
workstation booting with it's cool, black-on-white firmware prompt?
The higher the detail, the better I think. Some of you guys must most
definitely have one of these :D
Thanks in advance.
--
Matt Sealey <[EMAIL
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:16 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Serge wrote:
> > - sorry for the duplicate mail...
> > - sorry also for relating about what is not sticktly Openwin considerations.
> >
> > But however a little : my FlightGear, as well pkg-get installed (with Mesa)
> > for x86 on a sta
Sergio wrote:
- In the fact, and since my mysterious problem with the simulator, it is
also true that the native Xsun server, a little more as Xorg, provides
yet a fine and fast display. Its also not impossible that the
screenshoot with FlightGear, wich i saw on a Opensolaris homepage, comes
f
Serge wrote:
- sorry for the duplicate mail...
- sorry also for relating about what is not sticktly Openwin considerations.
But however a little : my FlightGear, as well pkg-get installed (with Mesa) for
x86 on a standard Solaris 10, works to slow ; good. In this case, a solution
can be to u
- sorry for the duplicate mail...
- sorry also for relating about what is not sticktly Openwin considerations.
But however a little : my FlightGear, as well pkg-get installed (with Mesa) for
x86 on a standard Solaris 10, works to slow ; good. In this case, a solution
can be to use a Opensolari
Alan Coopersmith a écrit :
> > Also i recently saw a Opensolaris screenshot with FlightGear, witch needs
> > the DRI : right ?
From what I can see at flightgear.org it does not require DRI, simply OpenGL.
OK : good think ! I was not sure, and on Fedora DRI makes all : without DRI the
simulat
Alan Coopersmith a écrit :
> Also i recently saw a Opensolaris screenshot with FlightGear, witch
needs the DRI : right ?
From what I can see at flightgear.org it does not require DRI, simply
OpenGL.
OK : good think ! I was not sure, and on Fedora DRI makes all : without
DRI the simulator d
Serge Coche wrote:
Anyone know that the standard Solaris 10 kernel does not support the direct rendering (DRI).
Right.
> Also i recently saw a Opensolaris screenshot with FlightGear, witch needs
the DRI : right ?
From what I can see at flightgear.org it does not require DRI, simply OpenGL.
On 8/15/05, Pradeep Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any OpenSolaris build machines available to which i can login using
> ssh (putty) from my PC and play with a source gate?. If not would appreciate
> someone creating one!.
>
This is something that I am working on ..
--
Dennis Clarke
Dire
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Pradeep Kumar wrote:
> Any OpenSolaris build machines available to which i can login using
> ssh (putty) from my PC and play with a source gate?. If not would appreciate
> someone creating one!.
AT the risk of asking a dumb question, what's preventing you from
installing Ope
Reposted from Help forums, as I got no replies there.
--
Hi
After trying various upgrade paths and installs as suggested in the previous
thread, I finally tried a text based install instead of the standard interactive
I selected upgrade and chose alot of packages which appeared not to be
Any OpenSolaris build machines available to which i can login using
ssh (putty) from my PC and play with a source gate?. If not would appreciate
someone creating one!.
Pdeep
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
o
OK : thank you very well.
But in this case, how was possible to run FlightGear on Opensolaris, as i saw
recently on a screenshoot ?
Cheers
Sergio
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensol
Of course the body shoudl agree with the subject. The meeting is on
*Tuesday night*
Alan.
Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
The Sydney Open Solaris User Group will be holding it's third meeting
on Thursday night at the iForce Centre, 33 Berry St, North Sydney.
Map -
h
The Sydney Open Solaris User Group will be holding it's third meeting
on Thursday night at the iForce Centre, 33 Berry St, North Sydney.
Map -
http://www.whereis.com/whereis/mapping/zoomMap.do?mapIndex=7&brandId=1&lev
el=1
Kavit Munshi will speak about Asterisk on Solaris and I will be
attempt
23 matches
Mail list logo