It's a step forward that Linux as well as Windows will run on newer SunPCi
cards. But what about getting [Open]Solaris x86 to run on them? Too bad the
card doesn't have a 64-bit Athlon, but even 32-bit x86 together with SPARC on
the same box might be handy for those that wish to support
On 31/08/05, Gary Gendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is zfs endian independent? I just went through a bad experience when I tried
to move a ufs volume from a sparc to x86 Solaris box. I also tried Linux
because the documentation claims that Linux ufs is able to read either ufs
endian, but I
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 11:12, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Making UFS dual endian would not be really hard.
and it's been done to a cousin of the Solaris UFS code (take a look at
NetBSD; look through their ufs/ffs and fsck code for FFS_EI ifdefs).
To port that over to solaris, additional work would
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, James Lick wrote:
Why not? I still get free CDs of various Linux distros at conferences
even though they could be downloaded for free too. I'd guess that most
people would be more likely to try it out if they have the media right
in front of them than go through the
Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, James Lick wrote:
Why not? I still get free CDs of various Linux distros at conferences
even though they could be downloaded for free too. I'd guess that most
people would be more likely to try it out if they have the media right
in front of them than
I still get free CDs of various Linux distros
What does this do to the CAB/Governance charter's assertion that
OpenSolaris Is Not a Single Product
There is no OpenSolaris distribution in the same way
that there is no single Linux distribution.
I believe that there
Joerg Schilling schrieb:
At mount time the correctness of Bill Joy's birthday needs to be verified
Actually, it is Kirk's birthday.
Daniel
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm not affiliated with either Sun or Apple, so I don't know how practical this
is. However, if I'm not mistaken, Sun's and Apple's open source licenses were
inspired by the MPL, so would Apple and Sun be able to share a common codebase
for implementing some open standards?
This message posted
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, John Plocher wrote:
What does this do to the CAB/Governance charter's assertion that
OpenSolaris Is Not a Single Product
There is no OpenSolaris distribution in the same way
that there is no single Linux distribution.
I believe that there needs to be
That's great news, Sara. Thanks for all your persistent work with the
fulfillment company to make those shirts *finally* fly the coop!
I hope that everyone wears them in good health. :-)
Claire
Original Message
Subject: [osol-mktg] ALL of the 1st 5000 t-shirts have
Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At mount time the correctness of Bill Joy's birthday needs to be verified
Actually, it is Kirk's birthday.
Maybe it's Bill Joy's birthday in Sun's UFS and Kirk's in the
BSD one? But wasn't Bill involved with BSD before Kirk?
But Kirk was
John Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have checked the docs but want some guidance on whether applications
that work on Solaris 8.5 have a good chance of working on OpenSolaris. Mainly
this one :
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/freepoplog.html#pcsolaris
Mmmm
Hi Joerg,
Must have been a close call between you, I think Poplog was
around about the same time, I don't know about Poplog Ved.
Of course my first idea was to try to install SchilliX but I
somehow got the impression that it wasn't that simple. If indeed it is
Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you believe this, do you have any prove for this?
There are many other sites which cite Kirk as primary author of FFS. But
Kirk himself is more humble about it:
- Bill Joy did the first design of FFS. I implemented his initial design
- filling
Is it just me, or do others think that the e-mail notifications of
watched threads is lame? Here's what I get:
---
You are watching the forum discuss, which was updated Aug 31, 2005 3:40:27 PM
by Sherry Q. Moore.
To view the forum, visit:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=26.
John Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joerg,
Must have been a close call between you, I think Poplog was
around about the same time, I don't know about Poplog Ved.
The source I did fetch mentions the first Copyright for Poplog Ved to 1993.
Of course my
Richard == Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Is it just me, or do others think that the e-mail notifications of
Richard watched threads is lame? Here's what I get:
Richard ---
Richard You are watching the forum discuss, which was updated Aug 31, 2005
3:40:27 PM by Sherry Q.
Isn't discuss above the forum name?
Sure, but OpenSolaris-discuss is more better.
Thread name is the bigger peeve.
-- richard
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Joerg Schilling schrieb:
Daniel Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a UFS version from SunOS-4.0 (1987) or later, newfs of course and
even by default uses bigger values (depending on the geometry and size
of the disk). BTW: The number of inodes/cylinder group is unrelated
to the number of
Hi Matt,
Thanks for this info. Poplog carries its own build system which
piggybacks off the system it is on. I see in an old message on comp.lang.pop
that at one English University they have this running on Solaris 10 using the
sun compiler, though it is not publically available
Richard Elling wrote:
Is it just me, or do others think that the e-mail notifications of
watched threads is lame? Here's what I get:
---
You are watching the forum discuss, which was updated Aug 31, 2005
3:40:27 PM by Sherry Q. Moore.
To view the forum, visit:
21 matches
Mail list logo
