Unfortunately, we can't update that when we deliver new versions in
patches, so relying on the DESC field is not useful. There is no
generic way to find the upstream version of software in a Solaris
package - you have to rely on the software to have a -v or --version
or equivalent.
And that
If someone wants to use irssi irc client on solaris 10 - 11 x86 but gets errors
connected with perl, do the following:
cd src/perl/common
edit Makefile
remove -KPIC flag
remove optimization flags -xO3 -xspace -xlidoff
Do this in src/perl/common,src/perl/ui,src/perl/textui,src/perl/irc
Only by
On Saturday 08 October 2005 02:37 am, Martin 'MC' Brown wrote:
VERSION: 11.10.0,REV=2005.08.26.07.05
The above info pertains to Solaris.
I know that, you know that. New users? Especially those who might be
trying Solaris out from Linux?
No argument, but wouldn't the user do:
$ bash
I don't mean to start a flamewar - I already said Solaris has gotten a lot
better with S10 but come on - it still has slower fork, slower thread creation
the last I checked even on S10. The SPEC benchmarks also are a piece of Crap,
are they?
All I was saying to the OP was that if he uses 1-2
On 10/8/05, Sh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone wants to use irssi irc client on solaris 10 - 11 x86 but gets
errors connected with perl, do the following:
cd src/perl/common
edit Makefile
remove -KPIC flag
remove optimization flags -xO3 -xspace -xlidoff
Do this in
On 10/8/05, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 07 October 2005 07:48 pm, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Alan DuBoff wrote:
snip
I will try to find time to re-install Solaris Express 23. Now, come to
think about it, I believe what happened was that, when se23 did not
recognize
On Friday 07 October 2005 07:48 pm, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
The fact that Solaris is different from Linux, and that it requires a
steeper learning curve, may actually be advertised as an advantage. (Read:
an elite OS) Easy may not play well with business users. OTOH a
default Linux
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Martin 'MC' Brown wrote:
Unfortunately, we can't update that when we deliver new versions in
patches, so relying on the DESC field is not useful. There is no
generic way to find the upstream version of software in a Solaris
package - you have to rely on the
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I don't really know what the problem is with build 23 but somehow I
_highly_ doubt we went from networking working fine to does not
configure by default in one rev.
I installed build 23 twice, and neither time it installed
--- Cyril Plisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 07:35 -0700, S Destika wrote:
I don't mean to start a flamewar - I already said
Solaris has gotten a lot better with S10 but come on
- it still has slower fork, slower thread creation
the last I checked even on S10. The SPEC
Thank you Theo for making the point about OS's is exactly I wanted to convey
about CPU architecture. I have seen several articles with OS comparisons
but little when it comes to hardware architecture.
It looks like I have researching to do and I think I'll write my own article
on the
On Saturday 08 October 2005 09:33 am, David Schanen wrote:
No one is truly qualified to speak on how easy or difficult Solaris or
GNU/Linux is outside their specific domain of experience.
Everyone is entitled to speak for themself on how difficult they feel either
are. This is all opinion
You'd better backup your statements with figures.
I already referred to SPEC benchmarks. If you will only believe in what Sun
says, check this
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4240498 - it is open
since ages and talks about Fork being 2-6 times faster on Linux. (Yeah
On Oct 8, 2005, at 11:55 AM, Eric Enright wrote:On 10/8/05, Sh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If someone wants to use irssi irc client on solaris 10 - 11 x86 but gets errors connected with perl, do the following:cd src/perl/commonedit Makefileremove -KPIC flagremove optimization flags -xO3 -xspace
Hi,
Please do me a favor,when you doing the investigation of Solaris
SVR4 PMS(package mangement system), please look at TWW's Hyper PMS
that released with GPL licence. (see ref1 and ref2).
I will do - thanks for the tip :)
MC
--
Martin 'MC' Brown, http://MCslp.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
