[osol-discuss] Resize Solaris fdisk partition?

2007-06-28 Thread Chris Ferebee
Is it possible to resize (enlarge) the Solaris fdisk partition on Solaris Express x64, in order to create additional slices? (I. e., allocate the additional space to previously unused slices.) As described in my previous post ZFS over AVS SNDR with single RAID disk mirror pair, I'm trying to

[osol-discuss] Re: About CDE source code

2007-06-28 Thread Peter Howkins
Girts, this may be of interest to you. I've recently been in discussion with the Open Group about releasing CDE and Motif under a fully open license. TOG have been quite positive about the idea, but there are still some sticking points. More information here. http://www.marutan.net/cde/

Re: [osol-discuss] What *is* OpenSolaris about?

2007-06-28 Thread Jim Grisanzio
Joerg Schilling wrote: Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Artem Kachitchkine wrote: Darren, I feel like you covered the floor with little metal balls - one would slip no matter where he steps. I think that extensive discussions here and on indiana-discuss have established beyond

[osol-discuss] Re: Why we should have an OpenSolaris Hosted binary set.

2007-06-28 Thread Ivan Wang
Thanks for putting up a focused (at least intend to be) thread on the subject. Now, I've been tracking indiana-discuss last week or so, but still feel there is a conflict on what indiana should be. Current consensus seems like indiana is to be a minimum/core distro for other distro to refer, to

[osol-discuss] Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaCP Beta1-test2 (ZFS/Boot - manual partitioning support)

2007-06-28 Thread Erast Benson
just use pkgadd -d wrapper. it will auto-magically convert SVR4 package to the .deb(s) and install them on the fly. You can also use pkgrm to remove them. pkginfo wrapper is also available. On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 16:38 +0200, Selim Daoud wrote: superbe job...synaptic package manager is really

[osol-discuss] Enigmail for Solaris =10 Sun Studio builds of TB 2.0.x

2007-06-28 Thread Dirk Wetter
Hi, since I was desperately missing an enigmail binary (a TB extension and backend to GnuPG) I did the work it myself. If you're using Thunderbird 2.X under Solaris =10 x86/SPARC and want to send encrypted/signed e-mails, feel free to help yourself @

[osol-discuss] Re: ON build error

2007-06-28 Thread Tom Chen
Hello, Yesterday, I tried to build on NV65 and got more errors. Looks like [u]ON Consolidation 20070625[/u] can not be built on recent OS version. It might require old compiler/linker/lint. /export/home/tao/testws/usr/src/uts/intel/sys/archsystm.h, line 113: warning: function argument

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: About CDE source code

2007-06-28 Thread Dirk Wetter
Am 28.06.2007 13:08, Peter Howkins schrieb: Girts, this may be of interest to you. I've recently been in discussion with the Open Group about releasing CDE and Motif under a fully open license. TOG have been quite positive about the idea, but there are still some sticking points. for what?

Re: [osol-discuss] audio driver for solaris 10

2007-06-28 Thread Shawn Walker
On 28/06/07, liugang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,I have a problem on sound card that can not produce sound on solaris 10 OS. When I typed the /usr/sbin/mixerctl in terminal,that printed an information mixerctl: device /dev/audioctl not exist. Also, I typed the comand prtconf in terminal,

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: ON build error

2007-06-28 Thread James Carlson
Tom Chen writes: Yesterday, I tried to build on NV65 and got more errors. Looks like [u]ON Consolidation 20070625[/u] can not be built on recent OS version. It might require old compiler/linker/lint. /export/home/tao/testws/usr/src/uts/intel/sys/archsystm.h, line 113: warning: function

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: ON build error

2007-06-28 Thread James Carlson
Tom writes: But this guy successfully build on nv63 using ss12. The issue remains that our current supported build environment for ON uses Sun Studio 11. Other things _may_ work, and there are certainly people working to make sure that future versions of Sun Studio are part of the supported

[osol-discuss] Prevent a service from trying to restart and change the online status

2007-06-28 Thread Dan Fayette
I've been doing a LOT of research on SMF and created several manifests and am very happy with how all the pieces work and the additional functionality that is now available. The one question that I have been unable to find an answer to is the reason for this post. Before I list my question

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: ON build error

2007-06-28 Thread Tom Chen
Hi James, Thanks for your explaination. I first tried on nv61 which uses ss11, so, the compilation was mostly ok, except this error: [b] lint warnings src lint: Fatal error in /opt/SUNWspro/prod/bin/lint2[/b] see more at

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: ON build error

2007-06-28 Thread James Carlson
Tom Chen writes: Do you think this bug is benign? It depends on what you mean. I'd guess that the bits built are usable. I certainly would not putback any change to ON, though, if my build resulted in lint dropping core. Do I need to download ON Build 61 Respins/Backouts Bundle (Mercurial

Re: [osol-discuss] ON build error

2007-06-28 Thread James Carlson
Tom writes: Solaris nv61 is a release back in this March, pretty old. I am wondering if it is good to use a recent relase but remove the default ss12, then download and install ss11? That sounds like what I'd do. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun

[osol-discuss] Re: ISO of a 16 channel sata2 controller..

2007-06-28 Thread mike
i have an areca 16 port card. the ARC-1216 i believe it is. supposedly it is supported nicely under solaris/OS too... (i have used areca products under linux, windows and freebsd myself) it might be up for sale actually soon (i might be going the path of eSATA+port multipler enclosures myself)

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Announcing the belenix-discuss mailing list

2007-06-28 Thread Venky TV
But I have a question: Why is the ML not listet in the OpenSolaris forums page? http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/index.jspa?categoryID=1 The Jive gateway is slated to be removed. It will probably be replaced by something similar eventually. Most of the new mailing don't have Jive forums