Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
Using the OpenSound driver:
bash-3.00$ /usr/bin/ossinfo
Version info: OSS 4.0 (build 1004/200707062145)
(0x00040002)
Platform: SunOS/i86pc 5.11 opensol-20070709
Number of audio devices:3
Number of audio engines:7
Number of MIDI devices:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 23:33 -0700, Dev Mazumdar wrote:
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
Using the OpenSound driver:
bash-3.00$ /usr/bin/ossinfo
Version info: OSS 4.0 (build 1004/200707062145)
(0x00040002)
Platform: SunOS/i86pc 5.11 opensol-20070709
Number of audio devices:3
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 23:33 -0700, Dev Mazumdar wrote:
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
Using the OpenSound driver:
bash-3.00$ /usr/bin/ossinfo
Version info: OSS 4.0 (build 1004/200707062145)
(0x00040002)
Platform: SunOS/i86pc 5.11 opensol-20070709
Number of audio devices:3
Eko Budhi Suprasetiawan writes:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short list ?
It's not clear what the question might be here, but the list
previously cited:
http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
points to all of the OpenSolaris-base distributions of which we're
aware. There are
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short list ?
Yes - those are the known distributions. Not so bad for a 2-year
old project, IMO.
I guess you are comparing the number of distributions to what's
available on Linux. But the explosion of distros is a reasonably
new phenomenon even
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:59 +0530, Venky wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short list ?
Yes - those are the known distributions. Not so bad for a 2-year
old project, IMO.
I guess you are comparing the number of distributions to what's
available on Linux. But the
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very many happy people in the Solaris
community if we started seeing a number forks, pardon, distros of Solaris
increase.
One of the things we as a community have often communicated is that we
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very many happy people in the Solaris
community if we started seeing a number forks, pardon, distros of Solaris
increase.
One of the things we as a community have often
UNIX admin wrote:
To build the knowledge following development projects
are started in the Menhir project:
* A document based on BSD Associate Exam Objectives
will be written which guides every user in the use
and administration of FreeBSD, NetBSD, Slackware and
OpenSolaris.
* A document
Dear Gaopeng Chen,
The first step of your project is stated to focus on the support of
desktop systems. It stores and manages the fingerprint records in
local system.
I am experimenting with a few desktop motherboards for Solaris
installation and I happen to have a notebook barebone with a built
On Jul 13, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Jim Adams wrote:
I know that Debian GNU/Linux has Synaptic for package management.
Is there a similar package manager for Solaris?
We use pkgsrc http://www.netbsd.org/docs/software/packages.html A
big reason for choosing pkgsrc is that it works on multiple
Dear all:
There're two lexical analyzer generator in Solaris/OpenSolaris
/usr/ccs/bin/lex
/usr/sfw/bin/flex
What's the difference between these 2 tools? Are they replaceable?
Thanks in advance.
p.s. And what about yacc and bison?
Regards
TJ
lex and yacc are the original crusty
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
There is no schedule yet - at the moment individual pieces are starting
to be removed (sdtimage is out already, sdtaudiocontrol will probably
come out around the time OSS goes in), but there's still some dependencies
on other pieces that need to be
陶捷 Tao Jie wrote:
Dear all:
I'm building ON source b66 these days. But I fail all the time, no
matter what I've tried, the nightly opensolaris.sh or cd usr/src/uts;
dmake all.
My build environment is:
Intel P4 with 512M memory, Solaris Express B66 + Sun Studio 11
I can't
This mail is sent to Bangalore open Solaris user group with a request to
forward / communicate to campus ambassadors / heads of departments of colleges
and student members.
My company, Isolated Networks, is based in Erode, Tamilnadu and is working on
installing solaris on X86 platforms.
We
Dear Gaopeng Chen,
The first step of your project is stated to focus on the support of
desktop systems. It stores and manages the fingerprint records in
local system.
I am experimenting with a few desktop motherboards for Solaris
installation and I happen to have a notebook barebone with a built
James Carlson schrieb:
Thomas Maier-Komor writes:
I am wondering if it is normal that pkginfo bails out with a dynamic linker
error stating that libssl.so.0.9.7 is missing on a nevada build 67 (SPARC).
No. That sounds like a broken system.
I've done an upgrade with live upgrade from
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very many happy people in the Solaris
community if we started seeing a number forks, pardon, distros of Solaris
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very many happy people in the Solaris
community if we started seeing a number forks, pardon,
* Kaiwai Gardiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very many happy people in the
Solaris community if we started
I would like propose a new project SCSI SAM Pseudo File system in OpenSolaris.
This file system will be somewhat similar to Linux’s /proc/scsi file system,
with several extensions.
In a typical setup, we have multiple systems connected to the storage devices
and each could have multiple
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:27 -0700, Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Kaiwai Gardiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very
On 7/18/07, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's of course your spare time and effort, but as far as (Open)Solaris
documentation goes, I believe that your time would be better spent developing
great new software for Solaris, on Solaris, than writing documents which
already exist, and
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:27 -0700, Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Kaiwai Gardiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would
For the desktop (forgot to add) - given the fabulous reputation that
Oracle has for security (chuckles) I wouldn't be using that as a poster
boy anytime soon.
What sorts of commercial desktop applications would you want? And that
doesn't seem to be something that is a fallacy of Linux,
[...]
I find the professional documentation for Solaris
fairly typical of
professional documentation these days, and not
terribly useful. It is,
as you say, detailed and step-by-step. What it
*doesn't* do is give me
any traction in really understanding how the system
works; which
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
How so? ATI drivers which are buggy and unreliable due to their
unsubstantiated paranoia over 'IP'.
But still better than what we have under Solaris.
True, but given the unreliability of it, one could argue that it is best
that Solaris doesn't have it.
I'm in the
On 7/19/07, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compatible?! talk to ATI customes who are at the mercy of whether
AMD/ATI can be stuffed creatingn compatible kernel drivers for their
distribution due to inter-distribution incompatibilities.
and yet they still have drivers while
28 matches
Mail list logo
