I don't understand something:
1.why are you taking me with legal issues?
2.why opensolaris contributors or employees usually fight sun employees?
I've started this thread so i could say its about my problems not yours(ken
and brian).
in the mean time i've solved the problem with the network card
Hey,
Ché Kristo wrote:
> Call me pedantic but isn't the term "project" to describe the activities
> carried out by this community a bit of a stretch. Sure there are projects
> within the community but to call this entire organization a project is a bit
> of a stretch.
Though if you look at other
Call me pedantic but isn't the term "project" to describe the activities
carried out by this community a bit of a stretch. Sure there are projects
within the community but to call this entire organization a project is a bit of
a stretch.
The Chartered Management Institute define a project as …
Googling a little I found some mdb commands to try. mdb seem to have
plenty neat commands, but I'm not entirely sure where I should look for
a deadlocked system:
***
> $msgbuf
BASELIMIT SIZE NAME
mdb: failed
> We ran into this bug today using the Live upgrade
> from Sol 10u3 - Sol 10u4.
>
> We are working in a sandbox environment and after
> doing the whole process of getting the BE prepared,
> we did not boot the zones again (to simulate the real
> production environment).
>
> Live upgrade is runnin
www.IcedOutPlanet.tk
www.IcedOutPlanet.tk
Check out www.IcedOutPlanet.tk for the best quality Jacob Watches. We
have over 100 different styles and can get ANY Jacob Watch! Cheapest
price online and we dont use dropshipping! We ship ourselves.
www.IcedOutPlanet.tk
www.IcedOutPlanet.tk
www.Ice
Greetings!
Logcheck is installed on a Solaris sparc machine running Solaris 10. It
(Logcheck) is being driven by a scheduled cron job and it works as it is
supposed to.
However, I am having a problem getting it to work whenever I try to add a rule
to the /usr/local/etc/logcheck.violations f
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:44:22 -0600
Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ken:
For the record I would like to point out that Brian's comments have
apparently been erroneously attributed to me. I suspect the comments
were intended to be directed at the OP started this thead thusly:
On Sat
I receive this message when my Solaris 11, 5.11 Ver SNV78 32 bit OS is
booting. "NOTICE: No HardWare Sample Rate Converter available". I believe it
is searching for a bit of hardware that I don't have. It does not effect the
loading, other than the message. I have searched here for about
ok ...
Can someoane help install my network card: marvell youkon(its a gigabit
lan).
i don't understand why solaris doesn't install network card driver.
When i made an Vmware install solaris installed a driver for thar "virtual"
NIC.
nobody unswered my question regarding installing Oracle databa
Yes! Indeed, I would argue that Solaris is the OS with the most mature
and scalable MT implementation - period.
Here are just a few of the Solaris multithreads milestones ...
multithreaded kernel - Solaris 2.0, Jul 1992
user threads library - Solaris 2.2, May 1993
Pthreads library - Solaris 2.5
Ken:
>>> Since i could'n unsubscribe form this forum, i'm asking you if solaris
>>> can be used as a desktop.Is there a repository containing 3rd party
>>> packets(like mp3 decoder).this is the minimum i require to pass to solaris.
Solaris ships with an mp3 decoder, since Sun has license to
On Jan 21, 2008 10:45 AM, Kuldip Oberoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We currently do not have all the rights to allow redistribution of Sun Studio.
>
> With many millions of lines of code developed over the past 2 decades, we
> have developed, partnered, and licensed, etc. to provide the best too
Hi everybody,
I am new in Solaris so the question may seem naive. Does
opensolaris -at least the latest release- exploits the benefits from the T1
opensparc processor?
Cheers,
Theo.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
here's the resulting dsl file.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
cpu0ist.dsl
Description: Binary data
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>> -Aubrey
>> Intel OpenSolaris Team
>> ___
>> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
>> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
> What does "Intel OpenSolaris Team" mean? (Reason I'm asking is that Solaris
> seems to
Thanks Aubrey,
The resulting .dsl does indeed contain _PSS. I'm attaching the resulting file
to the first message.
So it seems I'm hitting the bug Mark and you mentioned. Thanks to everyone for
helping :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> -Aubrey
> Intel OpenSolaris Team
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
What does "Intel OpenSolaris Team" mean? (Reason I'm asking is that Solaris
seems to be better supported on the X3100 chipset--re Lenovo T
Thanks Mark,
There are indeed aliases, but they only have _PDC and _OSC methods defined
(i.e. _PSS is missing) (I've attached the .dsl to my first post)
Is there any more info I could provide ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensola
On Jan 22, 2008 12:03 AM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) download the attachment.
> 2) run as root:
> # ./acpidump --addr 0xCFFBE0B0 --length > cpu0ist
Sorry for the typo. 2) should be
#./acpidump --addr 0xCFFBE0B0 --length 0x0277 > cpu0ist.
-Aubrey
_
It's a possibility that you are hitting:
CR 6605212 SpeedStep can't find _PSS for Processor declared by Alias
Can you check to see if you have an Alias defined for P001 in one of
your *.dsl files? If so, then that is the problem and it is fixed in b77.
Mark
Lurie wrote:
> My configuration is:
> What is "EIST" ?
Enhanced Intel Speed Step Technology
> Is there a BIOS option to enable speedstep?
Yes, and it is enabled.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I haven't installed any "frkit" package. This is a clean b75.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>My configuration is: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 + MSI P965 Platinum (Spee=
>dStep support enabled),
>the latter is on the latest bios firmware, running OpenSolaris b75
>
>I'm getting "cpu_acpi: _PSS package not found", so SpeedStep is not b=
>eing enabled by OpenSolaris.
>
>According to MSI, this mo
On Jan 21, 2008 12:28 PM, Lurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My configuration is: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 + MSI P965 Platinum (SpeedStep
> support enabled),
> the latter is on the latest bios firmware, running OpenSolaris b75
>
if you installed the relevant part of frkit, then you screwed it :P
nv
My configuration is: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 + MSI P965 Platinum (SpeedStep
support enabled),
the latter is on the latest bios firmware, running OpenSolaris b75
I'm getting "cpu_acpi: _PSS package not found", so SpeedStep is not being
enabled by OpenSolaris.
According to MSI, this motherboard su
On Jan 21, 2008 9:53 PM, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Year I want to ask this question also.
> But I think I will be out soon, "within this week" :)
> Btw I already searched arount, but still can not find where is the what's new
> information for each build, ex: what's new of build 78, b
Hi
Much depends on the code. If the code is cleanly written, and is already ported
to several platforms, then a port from Solaris SPARC to Solaris x86 should be
straightforward.
If the code does a lot of low level binary manipulations, and hasn't already
been ported (in particular to a little
Year I want to ask this question also.
But I think I will be out soon, "within this week" :)
Btw I already searched arount, but still can not find where is the what's new
information for each build, ex: what's new of build 78, build 79 etc.
Could anyone point me there?
Thanks and regards,
This
> Seems I have been waiting forever to get build 79 to
> correct many of the problems I have
> been seeing, Any update on when build 79 will be
> posted?
Last I saw was mentioned in opensolaris-announce; maybe Tuesday.
See http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=49637&tstart=0
Keep i
Seems I have been waiting forever to get build 79 to correct many of the
problems I have
been seeing, Any update on when build 79 will be posted?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@openso
Ok, boot -k did work, I could send break on console and do some lines to
save core;
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1756338 Jan 21 15:55 unix.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 306274304 Jan 21 15:55 vmcore.0
How do I convince some kind soul to take a look at why it hangs, or
teach me some coo
> > Your hostname is literally set to 'unknown', and
> your
> > system can't find
> > it in the DNS. You could/should set a proper
> > hostname and add that
> > entry to /etc/hosts and make sure files is in your
> > /etc/nsswitch.conf
> >
> > cheers,
> > steve
> >
> The hostname ¨unknown¨ was
33 matches
Mail list logo
