Hi Dennis,
Best would be not only to boot kmdb, but also to use the -ad boot
options to have kmdb prompt you.
When unix/genunix is loaded, set kmem_flags to 0xf via
kmem_flags/W f
That'll allow better diagnosis, see the memory debugging section of the
modular debugger guide.
Bye,
Admitedly, that is not your average PC, and while its fast its
price-performance
isn't leading, there are no Solaris systems on the list that beat it in
absolute
performance. Nor, indeed, any SPARC ones. Hopefully Rock will help
out, eventually.
Sun has not submitted a TPC-C benchmark
Can I just be clear on this - you don't want simplified, unified and
tested software installation; you don't want easier access to the core
OS software; and you don't want help from an extended community of
peers?
I think he may want that, bu the claims he is NOT getting that from
Linux;
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 13:51 -0800, Dr. Robert Pasken wrote:
From the Project Indiana description on sun's web site
Planned as an open source binary distribution of OpenSolaris, Project Indiana
is expected to create a user base and grow mindshare for OpenSolaris by
combining [b]what people
:original error text
kernel memory allocator: buffer freed to wrong cache
buffer was allocated from kmem_alloc_320,
caller attempting free to kmem_alloc_8.
buffer=d36f2400 bufctl=0 cache: kmem_alloc_8
panic[cpu1]/thread=d3738de0: kernel heap corruption detected
d3738cc0
Basically, the memory resource control for zone works. But it does not
constrain the physical memory well.
# prstat -Z
ZONEIDNPROC SWAP RSS MEMORY TIME CPU ZONE
0 57 240M 310M 1.9% 0:04:03 0.1% global
11 32 162M 235M 1.4% 0:01:08 0.0% bighead
The
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
When unix/genunix is loaded, set kmem_flags to 0xf via
kmem_flags/W f
OKay .. so CONTENTS|REDZONE|TEST|AUDIT == 0x8|0x4|0x2|0x1 == 0xf
gotcha ..
With moddebug I'll use 0xe000 for even more verbosity fun :-)
well .. if I look here :
Hi Victor,
when you set the capped-memory resources you have another option to
limit the use of locked memory. Locked memory is allocated with a non-
swappable flag and that is exacly the way Oracle uses to allocate its
SGA. Probably on your configuration Oracle SGA is in the 1.5-1.6 GB
UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So much of this reminds me of all the BSD-SVR4
religion of 20 years ago.
SunOS changed then to build something better, and
my view is that's to
fair extent similar to what we're doing with
Indiana.
Back then, Sun didn't change. What was done
W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from
the iso image w/o first burning to a CD/DVD? Thanks.
Well, you could mount the DVD or it's image and
follow the instructions...
Where can I find the instructions?
W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jörg,
Is there any way to install SchilliX directly from
the iso image w/o first burning to a CD/DVD? Thanks.
Well, you could mount the DVD or it's image and
follow the instructions...
Where can I find the instructions?
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone at Sun is interested to take the current code, he is welcome!
I am currently working on fixing bugs in sh and making it portable enough
to allow it to be included in the schily consolidation
Joerg, pardon, but Roland and many others did all
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi Dennis,
Best would be not only to boot kmdb, but also to use the -ad boot
options to have kmdb prompt you.
I must recall how to do that. I think one must simple edit the GRUB menu.lst
entry and specify -kad -B console=ttya or something
Totally agree - this is exactly what happened recently on a Linux server
I know of. But to say that the implementation is poor is to ignore the
prime motivation for such a system - many admins are too busy to compile
all their software from source, follow dependencies and finesse
implementation
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:33 +, Chris Linton-Ford wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 08:21 -0800, Mike DeMarco wrote:
Have you tried to do a
zpool scrub ?
Yes - no joy, completed without errors but didn't fix the problem.
The zdb command slowed the entire server down too much, so
I think he may want that, bu the claims he is NOT getting that from
Linux; specifically the fact that installing one package causes half the
system to be upgraded and parts to be crippled.
Totally agree - this is exactly what happened recently on a Linux server
I know of. But to say that the
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/
This is a link from http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ labelled:
ON Download Archives
results in the following message:
Not Found
The requested object does not exist on this server. The link you followed is
either outdated, inaccurate, or the
On Feb 4, 2008 10:58 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So much of this reminds me of all the BSD-SVR4
religion of 20 years ago.
SunOS changed then to build something better, and
my view is that's to
fair extent similar to what we're
Given the importance of zones and some other info, is there any formula to
calculate the number of CPUs that system will allocate to each zone?
e.g.
Following system has only two zones with dynamic pool service enabled.
Total number of CPU in the system is 32.
# zonecfg -z zoneA info
Joerg,
There is a problem with some of the networked storage that is used by
these download servers. We are currently working on repairing the
problems. Sorry for the inconvenience.
--joe
Joerg Schilling wrote:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/
This is a link from
CPU's in the hardware sense are not allocated to zones, but the
available compute resources are..
so in you scenario if all zones including the global are running at full
utilization, i.e. CPU bound, then zone a gets 80/86*100% of the CPU
resources,
if you stop the CPU bound tasks in zone b
Hi All,
Here is the December 2007/January 2008 issue of the OpenSolaris
Community Newsletter:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/newsletter/dec_jan/
If you have any content you would like to submit for February's
newsletter, please send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Linda
Victor Feng wrote:
Given the importance of zones and some other info, is there any formula to
calculate the number of CPUs that system will allocate to each zone?
e.g.
Following system has only two zones with dynamic pool service enabled.
Total number of CPU in the system is 32.
#
Dear Kebabber,
the file have been sitting there,
http://compass.com.hk/eclipse-SDK-3.3.1.1-solaris-gtk-x86.zip
for three monthes for downloads, when was CBE started the
v3.3.0 build?
the binary had been tested, though w/o any public feedback :)
will try to persuade [EMAIL PROTECTED] to retain
Due to some networking issues. No ETA on when service will be restored.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Clarence CHU wrote:
Dear Kebabber,
the file have been sitting there,
http://compass.com.hk/eclipse-SDK-3.3.1.1-solaris-gtk-x86.zip
for three monthes for downloads, when was CBE started the
v3.3.0 build?
The CBE build script for eclipse was submitted to sourceforge in
September last
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:27:41 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 12:14 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:01:18 PST
Dr. Robert Pasken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was a mistake to bring any sort of linux flavoring into
jerry -
I'm always assuming there is contention for resources, its not REAL
interesting if there is no contention and in this case there is none..
thanx, for the insight...
rich
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Victor Feng wrote:
Given the importance of zones and some other info, is there any
On Feb 4, 2008 7:30 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:27:41 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 12:14 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 07:01:18 PST
Dr. Robert Pasken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
This link:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
seems to have disappeared since the dlc came back up. We're looking into it.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
How to decrease the Brightness in SXDE? Or my eyesights will be hurted.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
kkk wrote:
How to decrease the Brightness in SXDE? Or my eyesights will be hurted.
Brightness of what? There is little the OS can do to your monitor.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
kkk wrote:
I 've installed the sxde on my notebook, the TFT screen don't have the
Brightness control button. So I need cotrol the brightness through the
software.
Most notebooks do this through soft keys, check your keyboard. Ether
that, or it's running in a low power mode.
Ian
I 've installed the sxde on my notebook, the TFT screen don't have the
Brightness control button. So I need cotrol the brightness through the
software.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:49:04 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 7:30 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:27:41 -0600
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 12:14 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 03
36 matches
Mail list logo
