@rpasken
I'll second that
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
GNU Watch wrote:
> I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
> at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
> developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
> GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt protect users and de
Dr. Robert Pasken wrote:
> Why is releasing Solaris under GPL a good thing? I see only bad happening.
>
>
Search the archive of this list, there's enough been said on this already!
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensol
Please don't feed the trolls
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Why is releasing Solaris under GPL a good thing? I see only bad happening.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
GNU Watch wrote:
> thats great advice shawn I send sun an email, sun need to promote you for
> your great feedback.
>
What is? Please keep the context you are replying to.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
ian you know how
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ian you know
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
thats great advice shawn I send sun an email, sun need to promote you for your
great feedback.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:43 PM, GNU Watch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey Shawn this "promise" was made over a year ago by Jonathan Schwartz and
> Rich Green. The statement soon retracted by them which I understand bro but
> they clearly said they are strongly considering it and there has been
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:41 PM, GNU Watch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey ian take it easy no one wants to start a licence war with you. I am just
> trying to get feedback from the opensolaris community.
>
The general consensus among the community has been that we don't want
that license. We
hey ian this post is not the first time its been up if you understand what i am
saying.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hey ian take it easy no one wants to start a licence war with you. I am just
trying to get feedback from the opensolaris community.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
GNU Watch wrote:
> I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
> at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3.
Please don't try and start another license war. If there ever was a
promise, kindly quote it and not some second hand reference to
This is a mail list, how can it (what ever it may be) delete a thread?
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
gnuwatch
Posts: 2
From:
Registered: 5/10/08
Readwill opensolaris ever be released under the GPL?
Posted: May 11, 2008 2:10 AM
To: OpenSolaris » discuss
Click to reply to this thread Reply
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other b
hey Shawn this "promise" was made over a year ago by Jonathan Schwartz and Rich
Green. The statement soon retracted by them which I understand bro but they
clearly said they are strongly considering it and there has been no progress in
that direction. Hey I appreciate your reply and dont mean
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:10 PM, GNU Watch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
> at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
> developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the GPLv3
because the CDDL doesnt protect users and developers freedoms as well
Submit a request to fix the bug back to the Motherboard manufacture, in my case
I had asked for AMD virtualization support in the BIOS and they came out with a
fix for the gigabyte MB I was using at the time, I was very pleased.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Guido Berhoerster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>>
>> I'm just going to have to disagree in general.
>>
>> Maintaining software is expensive, especially lots of software.
>>
>> Your belief seems to be that Sun should support the cost of the
>> dis
Shawn Walker wrote:
> I'm just going to have to disagree in general.
>
> Maintaining software is expensive, especially lots of software.
>
> Your belief seems to be that Sun should support the cost of the
> distribution by themselves, that if the community doesn't provide it,
> Sun has to, and th
22 matches
Mail list logo
