GNU Watch wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt protect users and
Hi there,
The title says much of it, is there any plan to bring IPS into SXCE? Or future
Solaris is still based on SVr4 packaging system?
If there is plan to integrate IPS into SX, any projected build for that?
Cheers,
Ivan.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other big whigs
at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the GPLv3. Many
developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until it is under the
GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt
Now let's stop this thread, it will not help us.
I can't even believe that anyone's arguing at all about this. Why? Take
a look:
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-mg
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The title says much of it, is there any plan to bring IPS into SXCE? Or
future Solaris is still based on SVr4 packaging system?
If there is plan to integrate IPS into SX, any projected build for that?
I'd figure that no plans have been made and the people involved in such
decisions are
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Shawn this promise was made over a year ago by Jonathan Schwartz and
Rich Green. The statement soon retracted by them which I understand bro but
they clearly said they are strongly considering it and there has been no
progress in that direction.
I believe the plan is to discontinue SXCE as soon as Indiana contains
everything available in SXCE (like Jumpstart, text based installer, etc.)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi,
yesterday I installed OpenSolaris 2008.05. It works perfectly, but I'm missing
the huge number of packages available for Linux distributions like Ubuntu or
Debian. E.g., I need Ruby with sqlite support. On a Debian or Ubuntu system
(with compilers installed), I could do this:
apt-get
Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now let's stop this thread, it will not help us.
I can't even believe that anyone's arguing at all about this. Why? Take
a look:
GNU Watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, I mentioned that OpenSolaris contributors are known persons
;-)
The GPL is crap, I hope to god it doesn't get used. Corporations violate it all
the time, developers don't bother to read it, and it's an awful license to use
if you want to feed yourself with your efforts.
It mixes politics with business for people with too little balls to act
politically.
That's pretty impressive, who's the manufacturer?
Thanks,
Tim
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It's out of date and appears unmaintained. Which is not surprising, but at this
point is annoying given there seems to be some effort to dumb down the OS for
the linux crowd. I can not figure out if SXDE is being discontinued for some
Tuxed up flavor that so far, does not look suitable for a
Well since I can't edit what I said I'll follow up what I wrote..
I saw that SXDE is being discontinued. This worries me and disappoints me too.
If i wanted to run Linux, I would. Solaris performs better, is actually
standards compliant, and gets tested well. I can't say that I am seeing the
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Helge G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Sun plan to extend the pkg.opensolaris.org repository over the lifetime
of 2008.05, so that it will become more and more comparable to the official
Debian or Ubuntu repositories, or will that not happen before the next
Tim,
Obviously you aren't too happy with the path being taken by Indiana and noone
wants to see your opinion excluded around here. The mainline Sun Solaris stuff
is well and truly out of the hands of this community, however Indiana belongs
to this community so of course your feedback to the
Helge G. wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I installed OpenSolaris 2008.05. It works perfectly, but I'm
missing the huge number of packages available for Linux distributions like
Ubuntu or Debian. E.g., I need Ruby with sqlite support. On a Debian or
Ubuntu system (with compilers installed), I could
Indiana will replace SXDE. Indiana is still Solaris, the only difference is
that it has a fancy new installer, ZFS boot and the GNU _userland tools_ set at
the beginning of the PATH env variable (all other variants are still there).
It's the tools, nothing more, there's no glibc6 or anything
UmmSXDE is really onlySXCE + Studio + netbeans
It is possible for any biweekely SXCE Build to run the developer tools
install script.
In fact its what I ususally do , as the SXDE installer is too dumb to be
usefull. ( apologies to Dave ) One assumes the the CAIMAN
Tim Scanlon wrote:
The GPL is crap, I hope to god it doesn't get used. Corporations violate it
all the time, developers don't bother to read it, and it's an awful license
to use if you want to feed yourself with your efforts.
The thing I find mot odd about GPL is that if you work in a
Folks,
I just installed OpenSolaris LiveCD(2008.05) that i got it from JavaONE.
The installation was smooth.
My problem is with the Ethernet card and it seems that the driver is NOT
installed.
My Laptop is a brand new Dell Inspiron 1525. I checked with Dell folks and the
Ethernet card
RETRO JORDANS NEW JORDANS + Bape/BBC:
http://theinternetbiz.com/catalog.html?Vl=38Tp=2
AIR FORCE ONE SHOES:
http://theinternetbiz.com/catalog.html?Vl=35Tp=2
cheap evisu jeans rmc jeans bbc jeans wholesale
http://theinternetbiz.com $6 global express ems
I saw that SXDE is being discontinued. This worries
me and disappoints me too. If i wanted to run Linux,
I would.
__snip__
Tim
I have been using SXDE/SXCE and predecessors thereof for almost three years
now. However, after one week of intensive testing playing with IPS among a
few
html
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1252
meta name=GENERATOR content=Microsoft FrontPage 6.0
meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document
titleNew Page 1/title
/head
body
table
tr
td style=BORDER-LEFT-COLOR: rgb(170,184,136);
Sorry about this spam ... I suspended the account.
Jim
--
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Tim Scanlon wrote:
It's out of date and appears unmaintained.
That road map was maintained by the tonic team at Sun (the team that
created OpenSolaris 4 years ago), but it really doesn't reflect the
entire project any more since most of that team's original plans are
done or have been
The roadmap thing is what I want.
I can handle digging out the flag-day/heads-up project page myself to see
what's being uh announced in terms of features and changes that're in
upcoming releases. That, even if it utterly fails on the P.R. front.. I get
embarrassed to have to refer people to
Use the Device Driver Utility tool to find out the chip of the Ethernet
controller, start this tool from menu: System-Administration-Device
Driver Utility.
If this tool reports no driver for this Ethernet chip, write down the
vendor id and device id of this device, look it up in this page to
27 matches
Mail list logo
