Hi I am very newbie to Solaris. I am trying to
install apache on Solaris10. Ihave an issue with
libraries
I have libs available but it is not able to
resolving.
Please find details below.
Can any one help me out ??...its urent
Apache on Solaris 10 (and OpenSolaris which is what this
Not sure I'd put it quite that way, but close to that.
I suspect Indiana _is_ aiming at the desktop, and ease of use
for those installing perhaps just one system, where
historically Solaris has been perceived by some as weak.
That's not to say that the underlying OS isn't pretty much
the same as
I've been running now for some time Solaris 10, SXDE and OpenSolaris on two
completely different desktop computers. They all perform extremely well.
If you really want to have something rock solid then I would go for Solaris 10:
extremely stable and fast.
Generally for all Solaris distros
When it comes to application development based on open source products
I'll give FreeBSD the edge. Installing and maintaining postgresql,
apache, (ruby on) rails, php, ImageMagick etc. from FreeBSD's
ports-collection is very easy, trying to get ImageMagick later than
6.3.0 on solaris on x86
Did you say FreeBSD 7.x versus OpenSolaris 2008.05 ???
Here is what I'm going to say about the subject:
1. FreeBSD 7.x has ZFS support {somewhat}.
2. Apples-versus-Oranges comparison
3. Install and scale FreeBSD 7.x/OpenSolaris 2008.05
on 8-16 CPU server Java-related solutions.
4. Conduct your
IBM xSeries 346 with added ServeRAID-7k ZCR controller.
No driver on the support CDs (v7, v9). SUN won't support that controller
legitimately saying it's hardware mfg concern. IBM won't support saying 346 was
never tested neither certified for Solaris. Go figure.
Now I know there is a driver
Hi,
I'd like to point out this stupidity in the localization of scp/ssh,
that can have *VERY* dangerous consequences (like being
locked out of your server).
At the first connection ssh asks you if you want to continue the
connection towards an unknown host, but the italian-localized
version
I'd like to point out this stupidity in the localization of scp/ssh,
that can have *VERY* dangerous consequences (like being
locked out of your server).
At the first connection ssh asks you if you want to continue the
connection towards an unknown host, but the italian-localized
version
2008/5/23 Nico Sabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to point out this stupidity in the localization of scp/ssh,
that can have *VERY* dangerous consequences (like being
locked out of your server).
It doesn't really lock you out though right?
Can't you always just delete your ~/.known_hosts
On Friday 23 May 2008 15:20:12 you wrote:
2008/5/23 Nico Sabbi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to point out this stupidity in the localization of
scp/ssh, that can have *VERY* dangerous consequences (like being
locked out of your server).
It doesn't really lock you out though right?
I grabbed OpenSolaris 2008.05 to see if disk performance had gotten any better
since my last try, which was Solaris 10 (8/07 IIRC). It had, but still not good
enough.
I have four disks, three IDE and one SATA. My highly scientific benchmark was:
dd if=/dev/... of=/dev/null bs=128k count=4000
Thomas Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I grabbed OpenSolaris 2008.05 to see if disk performance had gotten any
better since my last try, which was Solaris 10 (8/07 IIRC). It had, but still
not good enough.
I have four disks, three IDE and one SATA. My highly scientific benchmark was:
dd
I grabbed OpenSolaris 2008.05 to see if disk
performance had gotten any better since my last try,
which was Solaris 10 (8/07 IIRC). It had, but still
not good enough.
I have four disks, three IDE and one SATA. My highly
scientific benchmark was:
dd if=/dev/... of=/dev/null bs=128k
2008/5/23 Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I grabbed OpenSolaris 2008.05 to see if disk performance had gotten any
better since my last try, which was Solaris 10 (8/07 IIRC). It had, but
still not good enough.
I have four disks, three IDE and one
Bill Shannon wrote:
Are or will the CDE libraries be available for OpenSolaris?
They are not currently available, and their availability is
under investigation right now, so we don't know yet if or when
they'll become available or which ones could be provided.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-
Thanks for the quick answers! Here's a lot more data:
2GB RAM.
Now, most of this data is pointless - see the opensolaris dmesg to see what I
mean...
---
Linux
---
exscape ~ # time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296
Thanks for the quick answers! Here's a lot more data:
2GB RAM.
Ok; neither ata nor nv_sata are able to access
physical memory 4GB (AFAIR), but with 2GB
this isn't an issue
(For a system with = 4GB, a lot of extra copying
of dta might be happening ...)
May 23 10:51:10 opensolaris
I'm missing the ...DMA mode messages for the
P-ATA disks in the /var/adm/messages file.
It should include some messages about the
data transfer mode used with the P-ATA disk,
something like
MultiwordDMA mode X selected
ltraDMA mode Y selected
...
Yup, those are in there; UDMA 5 on
Bill Shannon wrote:
I spent several hours trying to get OpenSolaris 2008.05 (final version)
to work with a screen resolution larger than 1024x768 when running under
VirtualBox 1.6, but no luck.
I installed the VirtualBox guest additions, but they didn't help.
I followed the instructions in the
I've started a new opensolaris site on google sites. You can find it here:
http://sites.google.com/site/solarium
Feel free to check it out and correct any inaccuracies. It doesn't contain much
content right now, but I'll be adding more over the next few weeks.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message
Seems odd to me that ImageMagick was any trouble. OpenSolaris includes
ImageMagic 6.3.4-2. It should just build on OpenSolaris out of the box.
If you are having any problems getting it to build, please let me know.
I would be happy to work with you to build a newer version or get a
newer
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Claus Guttesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of ImageMagick was this? The one available on solaris
freeware for x86 is 6.3.0. This version had a bug where we couldn't
write text on an image. Tried to download and build a later release
from source but
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:10:15PM +0200, Nico Sabbi wrote:
I'd like to point out this stupidity in the localization of scp/ssh,
that can have *VERY* dangerous consequences (like being
locked out of your server).
At the first connection ssh asks you if you want to continue the
connection
On 23 May 2008, at 22:53, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:10:15PM +0200, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Proseguire nella connessione (sí/no)?
Sadly that accent is wrong (it should be grave, not acute, and read
sì) and there's no letter í on the keyboard.
...
By the way, a
Hi all,
i some problem
please help me,
jaekoo,
--
b87..
xvm[/] # virt-install --name solaris1 --ram 1024 --nographics -p --file
/dev/zvol/dsk/vm/solaris1-di
sk --location /media/sol-10-u5-ga-x86-dvd.iso
Starting
jaekoo wrote:
Hi all,
i some problem
please help me,
jaekoo,
--
b87..
xvm[/] # virt-install --name solaris1 --ram 1024 --nographics -p --file
/dev/zvol/dsk/vm/solaris1-di
sk --location
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Mike Kuhnkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does one release make more sense than the other as a host for VirtualBox .vs.
guest?
Can't give you a definitive answer, in terms of your original question
- but I can let you know my (personal) experiences:
Goal:
27 matches
Mail list logo
