[osol-discuss] Fwd: [osol-announce] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ package repository update (build 95)

-- Forwarded message -- From: Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:24 PM Subject: Re: [osol-announce] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ package repository update (build 95) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Alan Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [osol-discuss] bash line wrapping

Brent Jones wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Matt Harrison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Shawn Walker wrote: > > Matt Harrison wrote: > >> I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line > >> wrapping problem that is d

Re: [osol-discuss] bash line wrapping

Try resizing your window after connecting. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone

Mike Gerdts wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Trying to find that but meanwhile is this correct? >> >> copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums md5sums_95.txt > osol-0811-95a.iso >> >> or >> >> co

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

John wrote: > I came here to ask the same question. I installed the original SDXE and used > live upgrade to move to SDXE 2008.01. It was presented to us that this > version would be produced every 3 months. There should have been two more > SDXE by now. > > As far as I can tell, there is no

Re: [osol-discuss] bash line wrapping

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: > > Matt Harrison wrote: > >> I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line > >> wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2 > >> weeks and haven't found

Re: [osol-discuss] bash line wrapping

Shawn Walker wrote: > Matt Harrison wrote: >> I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line >> wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2 >> weeks and haven't found any solution. >> >> If I type a command that exceeds 65 characters (including the sh

Re: [osol-discuss] bash line wrapping

Matt Harrison wrote: > I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line > wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2 > weeks and haven't found any solution. > > If I type a command that exceeds 65 characters (including the shell > prompt), it causes

[osol-discuss] bash line wrapping

I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2 weeks and haven't found any solution. If I type a command that exceeds 65 characters (including the shell prompt), it causes the line to wrap to the beginning

[osol-discuss] coolstack php cli static build

Hi, I realize that this may not be the correct forum ... but will press on regardless. I am looking for help to provide a cli php for a small network of computers. Right now we have a static build of php separate from our coolstack cgi php. However, I would prefer to just use the coolstack cli

Re: [osol-discuss] missing lots of headers

Andras Barna wrote: > probably SUNWhea > excellent, that solved it, Thanks Matt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] missing lots of headers

probably SUNWhea On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Matt Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a re-install of an SCXE machine to get it onto a zfs root and I've > run into a problem. This time round I did an End-User install instead of > Entire Distribution and it has left out installing a lo

[osol-discuss] missing lots of headers

I did a re-install of an SCXE machine to get it onto a zfs root and I've run into a problem. This time round I did an End-User install instead of Entire Distribution and it has left out installing a lot of things. The box is used to run mongrel server for Ruby on Rails websites. I have so far

[osol-discuss] consider voting for solaris support on zimbra?

zimbra is an exchange replacement that we use at my company. it's pretty powerful, and runs on a wide variety of unix-like operating systems (even mac os x) - but not solaris. i thought i'd drop a line here to see if anyone might be willing to vote for zimbra to add solaris support (bugzilla r

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

Hi, I think it is obvious with all the sub-versions that ego's get in the way and more separations appear in the form of versions. Then it creates a situation where it gets spread thin in these different areas / versions / ego_my_name_on_something. What does it create? Confusion!At least with

Re: [osol-discuss] NIC failover problem - can't find problem

Anne Moore writes: > My two nics are setup for "Standby" in a group. They keep failover over to > each other, causing us massive down time. I'd suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a more likely place to look for help. "opensolaris-discuss" is a general-interest list, and as such has a *lot* of traffic.

Re: [osol-discuss] LU doesn't work with ZFS

Bob Palowoda writes: > Rather strange. When I do a man on lu the SEE ALSO section doesn't seem to > be high lighted. > A bug in man perhaps? I don't think he meant that the text is somehow visibly different in that section. Instead, he meant that the section "highlights" or "centers one's att

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

PG writes: > > SXCE is approx the same > > SXCE is not the same. SXDE is a much more thoroughly tested release than this > every-two-week SXCE which may contain serious instabilities and issues, or > may not work at all. That's not quite true. SXCE goes through a standard set of testing before

Re: [osol-discuss] How can I download a bug fix ?

Loeng Ong writes: > I don't think I use Open Solaris ... ... though that's what this mailing list is about. I suggest contacting Sun's support group for help with Solaris 10. > but the error log looks similar to the one defined in Bug ID:2137350. That's actually CR 6376800. > SunOS msy 5.10 Ge

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone simply upgrade snv94 t

Hi, We were looking at the beadm and last night ran some nightly thing. After reading the notes on that "Faster" piece it seemed like a bad idea. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opens

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from&for same LWP on Solaris 10

How does priocntl differ from pthread_setschedparam? Do they have same effect? When I use pthread_getschedparam, I get scheduling policy as OTHER & default priority of the thread as 0 (with max prioirty allowed on scheduling policy of OTHER as 20). How does these values correspond with Time Sha

[osol-discuss] September edition of Nexenta Hackathon

Greetings, The next Nexenta hackathon session is scheduled for Aug 31st Midnight (US/Pacific) The work will be coordinated on #nexenta IRC at freenode.net. You can also join us via the web interface at http://www.nexenta.org/chat. It's about time to merge with the Ubuntu LTS and migrate the bits

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone

Hi, Everything we do are on sun systems. (Sparc) Generally V240's and V440's The only thing I do with a windows box is burn cds/dvds and download files which then get transfered to a sun box After burning the image there are many files on the dvd. The -94 works fine and that has many files as w

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

I came here to ask the same question. I installed the original SDXE and used live upgrade to move to SDXE 2008.01. It was presented to us that this version would be produced every 3 months. There should have been two more SDXE by now. As far as I can tell, there is no upgrade path from SDXE 2

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to find that but meanwhile is this correct? > > copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums md5sums_95.txt > osol-0811-95a.iso > > or > > copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums_95.

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone

Hi, Trying to find that but meanwhile is this correct? copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums md5sums_95.txt > osol-0811-95a.iso or copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums_95.txt > osol-0811-95a.iso This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:20:26AM -0700, Ganesh wrote: > > > > > > Ganesh stated: > > < I want to increase priority of some of the threads . . > > The same man page describes whats required. > > ean. > > How do verify whether my user id has the privilege to assert > "PRIV_P

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

Ganesh stated: < > < > < > Ganesh stated: < > < I want to increase priority of some of the threads < > in my application on Solaris 10. For this, I'm < > calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want < > to increase the priority. < > < priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is < >

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

> > > Ganesh stated: > < I want to increase priority of some of the threads > in my application on Solaris 10. For this, I'm > calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want > to increase the priority. > < priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is > fails with EPERM "Not owner" err

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone simply upgrade snv94 t

Marc wrote: > Hi, > > uname -a > > SunOS ns1a 5.11 snv_94 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R > > sol-nv-B94-sparc-dvd.iso > > The upgrade I tried was called osol-0811-95.iso but that would not allow to > do anything. > > That looks suspiciously lice an OpenSolaris distro CD, not an SXCE one. If

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

Hi, What does truss show? max Borse, Ganesh wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't have "root" access on this server & not any other > servers, due to organization policy. > But, I guess, with root this problem may not occur. > > One thing noticed is that, if I don't give "TS_KY_UPRILIM,upriolmt," > arg

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

Ganesh stated: < I want to increase priority of some of the threads in my application on Solaris 10. For this, I'm calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want to increase the priority. < priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is fails with EPERM "Not owner" error. < According

Re: [osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

Hi Ganesh, Out of curiousity, what happens if you run the program as root? max Ganesh wrote: > I want to increase priority of some of the threads in my application on > Solaris 10. For this, I'm calling priocntl from the same thread of which I > want to increase the priority. > priocntl(priocnt

Re: [osol-discuss] installing OpenSolaris not easy-how does someone simply upgrade snv94 t

Hi, uname -a SunOS ns1a 5.11 snv_94 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R sol-nv-B94-sparc-dvd.iso The upgrade I tried was called osol-0811-95.iso but that would not allow to do anything. # df / (/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 ):50209260 blocks 3689703 files /devices (/devices

[osol-discuss] priocntl failure with EPERM when called from & for same LWP on Solaris 10

I want to increase priority of some of the threads in my application on Solaris 10. For this, I'm calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want to increase the priority. priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is fails with EPERM "Not owner" error. According to "http://docs.sun.c

Re: [osol-discuss] LU doesn't work with ZFS

> * andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I read on a previous post somewhere that the > menu-driven version of > > Live Update - i.e. the "lu" command - doesn't wokr > with ZFS due to a > > particular bug, but I can't locate the original > post. Doesanyone have > > a link to the bug in bugs.openso

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

> > there's no SXDE, a while, was "replaced" by > opensolaris 2008.05 > > (search the forums) > > opensolaris 2008.05 is only x86 and doesn't have the > same setup > > > SXCE is approx the same > > SXCE is not the same. SXDE is a much more thoroughly > tested release than this every-two-week SXC

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

> there's no SXDE, a while, was "replaced" by opensolaris 2008.05 > (search the forums) opensolaris 2008.05 is only x86 and doesn't have the same setup > SXCE is approx the same SXCE is not the same. SXDE is a much more thoroughly tested release than this every-two-week SXCE which may contain s