Bryan Allen wrote:
How full is your pool? Service starts crawling as ZFS has to spin
the platters to search for free blocks in disparate parts of the
disks.
(Perhaps someone else can explain that better, but that's my
understanding as to why full pool = slow pool.)
I try to keep my pools
Matt Harrison wrote:
Bryan Allen wrote:
How full is your pool? Service starts crawling as ZFS has to spin
the platters to search for free blocks in disparate parts of the
disks.
(Perhaps someone else can explain that better, but that's my
understanding as to why full pool = slow pool.)
Hello Matt,
Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 10:52:57 PM, you wrote:
MH Everything was working fine on our snv_97 fileserver then one day our
MH transfers had slowed to a crawl. I originally thought it was CIFS only
MH but after some tests I can see that its all network transfers including
MH scp
- As from some feedback my understanding is SCIM is
better platform for
Chinese input. What I don't understand is why iiim is
unusable for
Chinese users or is a blocker to adopt any new
Chinese user. It's here
for a years and I haven't notice Solaris Chinese
input is not usable or
is such
Robert Thurlow schrieb:
[...]
Screen is wonderful - I use it every day. But it's really a different
solution to a different problem than virtual consoles, which would
let me switch from a full graphical environment to a text console
and then back again.
Indeed, that's the point. I'm also
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matt,
Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 10:52:57 PM, you wrote:
MH Everything was working fine on our snv_97 fileserver then one day our
MH transfers had slowed to a crawl. I originally thought it was CIFS only
MH but after some tests I can see that its all
W.r.t. updating, can someone perhaps answer the following questions for me?
OpenSolaris 2008.05 2008.11 are released versions, i.e. they can be
considered stable? All the builds before, between and after, are these
considered 'unstable', i.e. in the sense of how Linux distributions and FreeBSD
Hi,
I've set up a PXE Server with all the required components (DHCP, tftp, etc.).
Currently my GRUB menu is located in /tftpboot/menu.lst.01001B243DE753. For the
client with the MAC address 01:00:1B:24:3D:E7:53 everything works fine. All
other clients are hanging at the grub shell because they
Wish to move per 2001? Now it is funny...
http://www.google.com/search2001/search?q=opensolarishl=enbtnG=Search
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Just plain vanilla 'menu.lst' should work.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi astade2
Thank you for your reply.
Unfortunately in my case a file called menu.lst does not work.
Alain
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alain Kaeslin wrote:
Hi,
I've set up a PXE Server with all the required components (DHCP, tftp, etc.).
Currently my GRUB menu is located in /tftpboot/menu.lst.01001B243DE753. For
the client with the MAC address 01:00:1B:24:3D:E7:53 everything works fine.
All other clients are hanging at
Paul van Berlo wrote:
OpenSolaris 2008.05 2008.11 are released versions, i.e. they can be
considered stable?
2008.11 is still under development and not yet had a stable release.
It's planned for release in November 2008 (the version is a release
date too).
All the builds before, between
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:24:45 PDT
Michael Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's OpenSolaris because you want ZFS and want package updates or software
management, you could opt for either OpenSolaris 2008.05 or 2008.11. You can
find the links here: http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
SXCE
Matt Harrison wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matt,
Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 10:52:57 PM, you wrote:
MH Everything was working fine on our snv_97 fileserver then one day our
MH transfers had slowed to a crawl. I originally thought it was CIFS only
MH but after some tests I can see
Matt Harrison writes:
Actually this could be related. About a week ago, the onboard NICs
started playing up and would drop connection about 70% of the time. The
only solution after talking with the list was to put in a PCI NIC, and
it's possible that it might have some issues (it's really
pxegrub default config file is:
/tftprootpath/boot/grub/menu.lst
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alexander R. Eremin writes:
Wish to move per 2001? Now it is funny...
http://www.google.com/search2001/search?q=opensolarishl=enbtnG=Search
Looks like we did better than promised, at least on the release.
Silly to reply myself. pargs(1) is what I've been looking for.
Karel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 1 Oct 2008, at 18:03, James Carlson wrote:
Looks like we did better than promised, at least on the release.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010417164807/www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2345514,00.html
Nonetheless, our share price seems to have dropped just a little since
that day...
Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonetheless, our share price seems to have dropped just a little since
that day...
Multiply the old values by four to get comparable numbers.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tinyurl.com/iiimf2
Honestly I didn't get the glitch you would like to point out with
these four screenshots. I was interested in helping explain the
glitches, but couldn't with the screenshots.
And original URL is just fine, I am not sure about others, but I
prefer to see the URL in
Paul van Berlo wrote:
[..snip..]
If this is the case, based on the information I
found on the Internet and in response to my forum
post, can I assume there's no such thing as 'updates'
for the 'stable' release of OpenSolaris 2008.05 and
2008.11 in the future? In other words, you always
Well, as long as the future holds bug fix updates to
the stable branch, I'm happy to go ahead and use
OpenSolaris 'the way it is now', and live with the
fact I need to update to a new unstable build to get
fixes if needed for the time being. OpenSolaris does
offer some features which I like
We depend following GNU packages to build/run Amanda (http://amanda.zmanda.com).
glib2-2.14.2-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
gtar-1.15.91,REV=2006.07.26-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
readline-5.0,REV=2005.06.07-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
curlrt-7.18.0,REV=2008.01.28-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
thanks for the answers.
We will follow filesystem(5) man page. For more information see
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Amanda_packages_from_Zmanda_downloads_page#Installation_directories
Paddy
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I just want to clarify that there is nothing wrong with blastwave packages. They
work well.
Amanda users will have to install these packages from another
site. These
6 packages have another 12 dependencies. If some of the packages were
available as part of default distribution install, users will
Hi All,
So I went back to B98, FDISK works fine on the extra space. Boot screen even
shows diagnostic disk and windows.
I've got B99 rge and audiohd installed fine, working with the Xorg group on
the video, it's only running 800x600 in vesa right now.
Athros is giving a problem, B99
Paddy Sreenivasan wrote:
We depend following GNU packages to build/run Amanda
(http://amanda.zmanda.com).
What are the OpenSolaris express edition equivalent packages? We would like
to avoid using packages from blastwave. This will make it easier for our
users.
There is no OpenSolaris
ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232
index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
nge0: flags=201000843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS mtu 1500 index 2
inet 192.168.1.17 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether
I installed 2008.05 on a new machine, upgraded to snv_98.
Now I'm trying to convert to static IP.
I disabled svc:/network/physical:nwam and enabled
svc:/network/physical:default. I went to System Administration
Network. It doesn't show *any* interfaces.
Sigh.
I rebooted. No help.
I
31 matches
Mail list logo
