The one big deterrent discouraging laptop users to
use OpenSolaris is the lack of the suspend-to-ram
feature.
CORRECTION! THIS STATEMENT IS NO LONGER TRUE!
SUSPEND-TO-RAM WORKS ON MY NOTEBOOK AS OF BUILD 98!
Ed.: I am doing this on an HP dv6928us notebook which
is an Intel core2duo
The one big deterrent discouraging laptop users to
use OpenSolaris is the lack of the suspend-to-ram
feature.
CORRECTION! THIS STATEMENT IS NO LONGER TRUE!
SUSPEND-TO-RAM WORKS ON MY NOTEBOOK AS OF BUILD 98!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
IIRC the mac address reversal bug was fixed long ago.
Not! The bug exists in osol b98 still.
A fixed version would not require the ifconfig ether hack.
Right.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Is there any movement on Nvidia 780a drivers
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Bill Shannon writes:
This was a problem 15 years ago when I left the OS group and I see
it's still a problem today. You OS guys need to understand that
most people experience desktop systems through the GUI. If the
GUI for *your* feature doesn't work, it's the same as your feature
not
Hi all,
I am new here,
I would like to learn the Unix commands , and for this i am planning to install
opensolaris through Virtualbox in my Laptop.
I am wondering whether all the Unix commands work in open solaris.
Thanks in advance
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Bill Shannon writes:
Ghee Teo wrote:
The new network admin GUI is all integrated to work to its full
functionality in snv 100
as far as I heard.
What exactly does that mean? The perfectly functional version in
older releases was replaced with a new partially functional version?
No.
Please post your dhcpd.conf file if you're using ISC DHCP. Any included config
files as well, e.g. if you use an include stanza in your dhcpd.conf.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I meant that to be for Alain... :P
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm just wondering if it's possible to replace a windows 2003 server that is
only used to provide network file access (AD file sharing based on user login)
with a Solaris 10 server running Java Enterprise System (JES). I will be
purchasing a Solaris 10 server for hosting Java Communications
Hi all,
I am new here,
I would like to learn the Unix commands , and for this i am planning to
install opensolaris through Virtualbox in my Laptop.
I am wondering whether all the Unix commands work in open solaris.
They all work.
At least they should all work in the latest OpenSolaris
Hi all,
I am new here,
I would like to learn the Unix commands , and for this i am planning to
install opensolaris through Virtualbox in my Laptop.
I am wondering whether all the Unix commands work in open solaris.
They all work.
CORRECTION ... I should have looked first.
There are no
Euan Thoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm just wondering if it's possible to replace a windows 2003 server
that is only used to provide network file access (AD file sharing
based on user login) with a Solaris 10 server running Java Enterprise
System (JES). I will be purchasing a Solaris 10
James Carlson wrote:
Is there still a problem here in the networking component itself
(other than the GUI)? If so, I'd like to help solve it.
No, after configuring it all by hand, networking is working fine.
The question is, why didn't the GUI find the interface? Is it
something about this
Dennis Clarke writes:
There are no commands to be found in /usr/xpg6/bin because those binaries
simply don't exist after installation in OpenSolaris snv_98 :
$ uname -a
SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_98 i86pc i386 i86pc
They seem to come from pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... do you have that
installed?
James Carlson wrote:
I am *so* sorry I upgrade to snv_98...
I don't see how that relates to the previous poster's note about
snv_100.
I had snv_86 working quite well on two machines and I was very happy
with it. Since upgrading those machines and installing snv_98 on
another machine (the
James Carlson wrote:
GPL other executables) must go in a different path to protect
delicate sensibilities, and the ARC members just as strongly disagree
that the file system hierarchy ought to be used to document one
company's licensing concerns.
delicate sensibilities? Having your
Brian Utterback writes:
GPL other executables) must go in a different path to protect
delicate sensibilities, and the ARC members just as strongly disagree
that the file system hierarchy ought to be used to document one
company's licensing concerns.
delicate sensibilities? Having your
Bill Shannon writes:
James Carlson wrote:
Is there still a problem here in the networking component itself
(other than the GUI)? If so, I'd like to help solve it.
No, after configuring it all by hand, networking is working fine.
The question is, why didn't the GUI find the interface? Is
Dennis Clarke writes:
There are no commands to be found in /usr/xpg6/bin because those
binaries
simply don't exist after installation in OpenSolaris snv_98 :
$ uname -a
SunOS aequitas 5.11 snv_98 i86pc i386 i86pc
They seem to come from pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... do you have that
Besides the pargs command you can also use the UCB PS command. P.e. /usr/ucb/ps
wwaxx [pid]
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue (again, as I understand it) is that since a GPLv2 library is
magically different, it has to go in a different path so that people
are horribly inconvenienced if they ever want to use it.
This is a discussion you should hold back for about a
There is absolutely no chance that SCIM will be considered for the upcoming
2008.11 LiveCD. There is just not enough time to go through the necessary QA
process. Also, if an exception were made (and for something of such
significant magnitude), who is going to close the flood gate that may
The reason ps won't give you the full command line for long command lines is
that it is limited by what procfs is configured to make available. This
configuration is done at compile time.
Cheers
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
In opensolaris snv_98 and snv_99, lucreate does not put an entry for the new BE
in menu.lst.
lucreate -c snv_99 -n snv_100 (I'm optimistic). This happened in 98 when I
wanted to Live Upgrade to 99. I had to do a fresh install. I tried it in 99 and
the same problem. I hope this gets fixed as I
Ron Halstead wrote:
In opensolaris snv_98 and snv_99, lucreate does not put an entry for the new
BE in menu.lst.
What about luactivate?
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi, Wayne,
Thanks for your appreciation!
IIIMF also supports using different input methods for different input
contexts. You could configure this behavior with iiim-properties, i.e.,
by disabling the The language is applied to all applications option in
General tab.
Regards,
W. Wayne Liauh
Hi, Wayne,
Thanks for your appreciation!
IIIMF also supports using different input methods for
different input
contexts. You could configure this behavior with
iiim-properties, i.e.,
by disabling the The language is applied to all
applications option in
General tab.
Regards,
Hi
BTW, while you are here :-) , could you look into
this little but very annoying bug, in that the
preferences in Chewing won't stick?For example,
every time I want to use the chewing method, I need
to activate the preference entry then go to the
keyboard option to select the Hanyupinyin
James Carlson wrote:
Looking through the truss output on /usr/bin/network-admin, it appears
that it invokes '/usr/sbin/dladm show-link -p'. I think that means it
may have been broken by the integration of CR 6722523 in snv_96. I
don't know why that hasn't been addressed in GNOME.
(The
30 matches
Mail list logo
