Re: [osol-discuss] Production use of OpenSolaris?

2009-06-17 Thread Ché Kristo
Perhaps Ben Rockwood can help you out here... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread philo neo
hello, j' have to install opensolaris, everything works well, share has which I am in multi boot and I do not find the /boot/grub/menu.lst file, where is it? PHILO -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

[osol-discuss] startx with root rights

2009-06-17 Thread philo neo
hello, j' have to install opensolaris, everything works well, how to make to have the rights root under gnome. I demare with a traditional user that j' have to create during l' installation, but I n' is not rights on the file, I would like to change the rights of nsswitch.conf, j' made a

[osol-discuss] Bad Memory

2009-06-17 Thread Steve
Hi all, I've got a Dell GX280SD that had 2 GB of RAM in it and all was well. Today, I installed 4 GB of RAM (2 x 2 GB). The 4 GB shows up in the BIOS and Windows Vista can see the 4 GB (multibooting) but FreeBSD and OpenSolaris can only recognize 3 GB. I put the snv_115 install CD in and

Re: [osol-discuss] startx with root rights

2009-06-17 Thread Steve
philo neo wrote: hello, j' have to install opensolaris, everything works well, how to make to have the rights root under gnome. I demare with a traditional user that j' have to create during l' installation, but I n' is not rights on the file, I would like to change the rights of

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread Bruno Silva
if you're using the default settings, it should be located at /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst 2009/6/17 philo neo philippe.poncebl...@orange.fr hello, j' have to install opensolaris, everything works well, share has which I am in multi boot and I do not find the /boot/grub/menu.lst file, where is

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread philo neo
yes i have /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst --- j' have to install the order sudo to change the rights of menu.lst but I am on a traditional user admin, the sudo t' has; it of the parrametres? i try sudo chmod 666 menu.lst i write my password and i

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread Steve
philo neo wrote: yes i have /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst --- j' have to install the order sudo to change the rights of menu.lst but I am on a traditional user admin, the sudo t' has; it of the parrametres? i try sudo chmod 666 menu.lst i write my

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread Anon Y Mous
If you read the other posts in the forum that were posted right before you posted your question, you would see that I had already given the answer (i.e. rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst) in a post that I made in a different thread just 3 hours before you made your post. Here's the link:

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
you might want to learn about pfexec and RBAC in solaris, it is both more powerful and better integrated than sudo in opensolaris On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:27 AM, philo neophilippe.poncebl...@orange.fr wrote: yes i have /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst ---

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread Anon Y Mous
You can just type in the command: su at the command prompt and hit the enter key and then type in the root password (the root password, not your regular user password) and become root. It's a pretty standard thing that is available on every unix like system. Once you are root you can also

Re: [osol-discuss] startx with root rights

2009-06-17 Thread Anon Y Mous
Philo, if you want to log in through GNOME as the root user, go to either of these two web sites in a web browser (I recommend looking at the first link from comp-sos.com and following its directions first before you try to go to the second link as Dennis Clarke has so much expert level UNIX

Re: [osol-discuss] startx with root rights

2009-06-17 Thread Anon Y Mous
Just click on the thumbnail pictures at this link: http://www.comp-sos.com/index.php/review/operating-systems/42-unix/80-install-azureus-open-solaris-200805 and the thumbnail will zoom in and become a larger picture where you can see what you need to do to enable root gnome sessions. -- This

Re: [osol-discuss] Osol based app that bcks up windows machines to zfs

2009-06-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Jan Kesten jan.kes...@gmail.com writes: Since bacula is written in good C you can compile it very easy under Solaris (I'm in fact doing it right now). You need some libs, a database and gcc - that's all. Time for that: 10 Minutes :-) Windows binaries are available at sf.net.

[osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere

2009-06-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Anyone know if the backup tool bacula is available to `pkg install' from one of the repositories? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere

2009-06-17 Thread Shawn Walker
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: Anyone know if the backup tool bacula is available to `pkg install' from one of the repositories? Not as far as I know. You can always find out by doing this: pkg search bacula ...if it doesn't find it, chances are there isn't a package for

Re: [osol-discuss] startx with root rights

2009-06-17 Thread philo neo
thank you very much j' have to find this qu' I needed. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] grub //menu.lst

2009-06-17 Thread Ron Halstead
You can just type in the command: su at the command prompt and hit the enter key and then type in the root password (the root password, not your regular user password) and become root. It's a pretty standard thing that is available on every unix like system. Once you are root you can

Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere

2009-06-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org writes: On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: Anyone know if the backup tool bacula is available to `pkg install' from one of the repositories? Not as far as I know. You can always find out by doing this: pkg search bacula ...if it

Re: [osol-discuss] Bad Memory

2009-06-17 Thread Ron Halstead
Try http://www.memtest.org/ --ron -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] How do I obtain an X11 development environment

2009-06-17 Thread Harry Putnam
I'm trying to install emacs-23 but running into trouble finding include files emacs expects to find. `Xlib.h' is one example. Is there a pkg that provided X11 development environment? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] How do I obtain an X11 development environment

2009-06-17 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Harry Putnam wrote: I'm trying to install emacs-23 but running into trouble finding include files emacs expects to find. `Xlib.h' is one example. Is there a pkg that provided X11 development environment? SUNWxwinc SUNWxorg-headers -- -Alan Coopersmith-

Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere

2009-06-17 Thread Shawn Walker
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org writes: On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: Anyone know if the backup tool bacula is available to `pkg install' from one of the repositories? Not as far as I know. You can always find out

Re: [osol-discuss] How do I obtain an X11 development environment

2009-06-17 Thread Shawn Walker
On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: I'm trying to install emacs-23 but running into trouble finding include files emacs expects to find. `Xlib.h' is one example. Is there a pkg that provided X11 development environment? Again, pkg search is your friend: $ pkg search Xlib.h

Re: [osol-discuss] Bad Memory

2009-06-17 Thread Jürgen Keil
I've got a Dell GX280SD that had 2 GB of RAM in it and all was well. Today, I installed 4 GB of RAM (2 x 2 GB). The 4 GB shows up in the BIOS and Windows Vista can see the 4 GB (multibooting) but FreeBSD and OpenSolaris can only recognize 3 GB. I put the snv_115 install CD in and booted

Re: [osol-discuss] How do I obtain an X11 development environment

2009-06-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com writes: Harry Putnam wrote: I'm trying to install emacs-23 but running into trouble finding include files emacs expects to find. `Xlib.h' is one example. Is there a pkg that provided X11 development environment? SUNWxwinc SUNWxorg-headers

Re: [osol-discuss] How do I obtain an X11 development environment

2009-06-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: So what does -r do different? Nevermind Oops.. sorry I missed you comments about the new pkg in 2009.6 in another thread a while ago ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Is `bacula' available in a pkg repository somewhere

2009-06-17 Thread Sean
We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] be_name literal

2009-06-17 Thread Tony Curtis
Doing an Update All from the package manager asks me for the new BE name, which I enter such as be-2009-06-01 for example. After the update reboot, the active BE is called, literally, be_name. Am I messing something up? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] be_name literal

2009-06-17 Thread Shawn Walker
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Tony Curtis wrote: Doing an Update All from the package manager asks me for the new BE name, which I enter such as be-2009-06-01 for example. After the update reboot, the active BE is called, literally, be_name. Am I messing something up? This is a known

Re: [osol-discuss] be_name literal

2009-06-17 Thread Tony Curtis
pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg SUNWipkg-gui SUNWipkg-um Thanks for the reply. I checked them, they're all up-to-date. Unless the fixed updates haven't made it through to the outside world yet? r...@opensolaris(~)# pkg install SUNWipkg No updates available for this image.

Re: [osol-discuss] be_name literal

2009-06-17 Thread Shawn Walker
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Tony Curtis wrote: pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg SUNWipkg-gui SUNWipkg-um Thanks for the reply. I checked them, they're all up-to-date. Unless the fixed updates haven't made it through to the outside world yet? r...@opensolaris(~)# pkg install SUNWipkg No

Re: [osol-discuss] be_name literal

2009-06-17 Thread Tony Curtis
Then I'll wait to see what happens next time. Thanks for the speedy responses. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] in.ftpd does not show ls output if connected with browser

2009-06-17 Thread Philip Torchinsky
I successfully configured ftp service on OpenSolaris (snv_111b x86). It runs, I can connect to an ftp server, and if I connect with command-line ftp client, everything works fine. However, if I connect with browser using URL ftp://u...@my.ftp.server ftp server does not show me directory

[osol-discuss] problem with tk/tcl

2009-06-17 Thread Mike DeMarco
I had a very small tk app that was working in build 81. I installed build 115 and get the following error when I try to start the app. Application initialization failed: Can't find a usable tk.tcl in the following d irectories: /usr/lib/tcl8.4/tk8.4