Hi,
Francois Laagel píše v čt 29. 10. 2009 v 12:04 -0700:
> Can we expect the adp driver (present in SXCE build 125) to be included into
> the OpenSolaris extra repository at some point in the future? That driver
> supports a bunch of old Adaptec HBAs--the AHA 2940 (aka AIC7861) being one of
>
On 10/29/09 06:55 PM, Mike DeMarco wrote:
I am running build 121 with firefox 3.5.1. Even thought the system
can see network printers and can print to them, firefox will not list
any printers and will only print to file??
I reported the same problem some times ago, I fixed with this method
Thanks all:
I was able to fix this by:
1) I removed the _all line from my home directory .printers
2) I added a new printer using Solaris LP printer manager.
After both steps were done both defined printers showed up under firefox.
Thanks all.
mike
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Thanks all:
I was able to fix this by:
1) I removed the _all line from my home directory .printers
2) I added a new printer using Solaris LP printer manager.
After both steps were done both defined printers showed up under firefox.
Thanks all.
mike
Glad to hear it, I'd
You might find that this is
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6850995 and
simply re-installing the package has only fixed it once.
If it happens again, try "svcadm clear hal" and see if things spring
into life again.
I did see something like this under builds 124 a
Hi Stewart,
What build are yyou running?
can you do /usr/sbin/print-service -q ?
How are the network printers you know exists setup?
Try this:
Just in $HOME/.gtkrc-2.0 or /etc/gtk-2.0/gtkrc. Just adding the line
gtk-print-backends="file,lpr,papi,cups"
-Ghee
Stewart Walters wrote:
Mike DeMarc
Some light on Adaptec ;-)
Note: In the past years Adaptec has lied to us repeatedly about forthcoming
documentation which would have allowed us to stabilize, improve and manage RAID
support for these (rather buggy) raid controllers.
As a result, we do not recommend the Adaptec cards for use.
Of
Hi Harry,
It's not actually that difficult once you get used to it. Think of it
like learning a new programming language - you're not going to write an
entire OS from scratch on your first day. Here's an example that took
about 30 mins to write (although the bulk of this was looking into the
Charles Monett wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Jensen Lee wrote:
At least they should be doing the right thing to "open" the source code of
every hardware component Sun no longer plan to support commercially, to
encourage their continued use and support in the "ope
>Hello,
Hi how are ya?
>I am very new to Solaris, I was using OpenSolaris 2008 LiveCD in Virtual Box
>and after spending >some time reading about it, I quite like ZFS and Zones. I
>have played around with ZFS in Virtual >Box creating multiple drives and
>simulated failures. I have decided to b
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors when applying patch 120222-31 and 119090-31 to
my alternate BE. Any clues?
bash-3.00# patchadd -R /a 120222-31
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
Checking patches that you sp
What OS release are you running? These patches were made for Solaris 10.
-- Alan
gorak wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors when applying patch 120222-31 and 119090-31 to
my alternate BE. Any clues?
bash-3.00# patchadd -R /a 120222-31
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed o
Shawn Walker wrote:
If those modules install under /usr/lib/*, yes. If you can have CPAN
install and deliver those modules under /usr/local/perl5 ... or perhaps
/opt/perl5/locl or some other directory that doesn't belong to an
existing package, then you should be ok.
Isn't the whole pur
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If those modules install under /usr/lib/*, yes. If you can have CPAN
install and deliver those modules under /usr/local/perl5 ... or
perhaps /opt/perl5/locl or some other directory that doesn't belong to
an existing package, then you should be ok.
Shawn Walker wrote:
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If those modules install under /usr/lib/*, yes. If you can have CPAN
install and deliver those modules under /usr/local/perl5 ... or
perhaps /opt/perl5/locl or some other directory that doesn't belong
to an existing package, t
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Brian Utterback wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
If those modules install under /usr/lib/*, yes. If you can have
CPAN install and deliver those modules under /usr/local/perl5 ... or
perhaps /opt/perl5/locl or some other directory that doesn't belong
t
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK
writes:
> Hi Harry,
>
> It's not actually that difficult once you get used to it. Think of it
> like learning a new programming language - you're not going to write
> an entire OS from scratch on your first day. Here's an example that
> took about 30 mins to write (although
I like what you're doing... will keep tuned.
Will Splunk do what you're looking for, or have you reviewed it? Sorry
if you already have.
Wow... learning a *lot* about Unix in here. =)
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 13:53, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Brian Ruthven - Sun UK
> writes:
>
>> Hi Harry,
>>
>> It'
It's running Solaris 10 Update 6.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[Added the rest of the conversation for those of us using email for the
forum frontend.]
This isn't an OpenSolaris topic, but I have a couple of suggestions:
Try running the failing command by hand to see if you get additional
output. If that doesn't help, you can check the Solaris 10 forums o
"Alex Smith (K4RNT)"
writes:
> I like what you're doing... will keep tuned.
>
> Will Splunk do what you're looking for, or have you reviewed it? Sorry
> if you already have.
Splunk is aimed at much broader level than my scripting. I'm not sure
if the same logging input would occur either. I've
21 matches
Mail list logo
